Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Answer to the Letter to the Editor of A. Takata, et al. concerning “Radiofrequency ablation is as safe and effective as surgical excision for spinal osteoid osteoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Sangiorgio A, et al. [Eur Spine J (2023): doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07411-8]

  • Author's Reply
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sangiorgio A, Oldrini LM, Candrian C, Errani C, Filardo G (2023) Radiofrequency ablation is as safe and effective as surgical excision for spinal osteoid osteoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 32(1):210–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klass D, Marshall T, Toms A (2009) CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of spinal osteoid osteomas with concomitant perineural and epidural irrigation for neuroprotection. Eur Radiol 19(9):2238–2243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laus M, Albisinni U, Alfonso C, Zappoli FA (2007) Osteoid osteoma of the cervical spine: surgical treatment or percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation? Eur Spine J 16(12):2078–2082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Morassi LG, Kokkinis K, Evangelopoulos DS, Karargyris O, Vlachou I, Kalokairinou K et al (2014) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of spinal osteoid osteoma under CT guidance. Br J Radiol 87(1038):20140003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang B, Han SB, Jiang L, Yuan HS, Liu C, Zhu B et al (2017) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for spinal osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Eur Spine J 26(7):1884–1892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu X, Wang B, Yang S, Han S, Jiang L, Liu X et al (2019) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus open surgical resection for spinal osteoid osteoma. Spine J Official J North Am Spine Soc 19(3):509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland

    Alessandro Sangiorgio, Lorenzo Massimo Oldrini, Christian Candrian & Giuseppe Filardo

  2. Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

    Christian Candrian & Giuseppe Filardo

  3. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

    Costantino Errani

  4. Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

    Giuseppe Filardo

Authors
  1. Alessandro Sangiorgio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenzo Massimo Oldrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Candrian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Costantino Errani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giuseppe Filardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Sangiorgio.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sangiorgio, A., Oldrini, L.M., Candrian, C. et al. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of A. Takata, et al. concerning “Radiofrequency ablation is as safe and effective as surgical excision for spinal osteoid osteoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Sangiorgio A, et al. [Eur Spine J (2023): doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07411-8]. Eur Spine J 32, 1481–1482 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07612-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07612-9

Search

Navigation