Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intravenous lidocaine simultaneously infused with sufentanil to accelerate gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after thoracolumbar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction is one of the common complications of surgery, especially after surgery for a thoracolumbar spinal fracture. Intravenous lidocaine is a potential method to improve postoperative gastrointestinal function in surgical patients, reduce opioid use and shorten hospital stays. The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of intravenous lidocaine on the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients after thoracolumbar surgery.

Methods

In this study, 48 eligible patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spine fractures resection and internal fixation surgery were enrolled to receive intravenous injections of lidocaine in different concentrations during the perioperative period. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: control group (group A), low concentration of lidocaine group (group B) and high concentration of lidocaine group (group C), 16 patients in each group. First postoperative exhaust time, numbers of bowel sound at preoperative and postoperative 3, 6, 12, 24 h, pain scores at postoperative 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 h, total sufentanil use in PACU and perioperative periods, postoperative hospital stay and analgesic remedy within postoperative 48 h were recorded and compared. The primary endpoints include: the time of first flatus passage after the operation, the number of bowel sounds per minute counted with stethoscope at 30 min before anesthesia induction and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperative. The secondary endpoints included: the pain scores at PACU (after entering into PACU), 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperative, the amount of sufentanil administrated by intravenous push during operation and the numbers of patients needed rescuing sufentanil in PACU, and the numbers of patients needed administration of gastric motility drugs or non-steroidal analgesics at ward within 48 h postoperation, length of hospital stay (from the first day after surgery to discharge from hospital) and the incidence of adverse reactions.

Results

Compared with group A, the first postoperative exhaust time in group B and C occurred much earlier (23.3 ± 11.0 h vs. 16.0 ± 6.6 h, 16.6 ± 5.1 h, P < 0.05). Compared with preoperation, the numbers of bowel sound significantly increased at 24 h postoperatively in group B, while group B at 6 h and group C at 6 and 24 h postoperatively had significantly more active bowel sounds compared to group A (P < 0.05). There were no remarkable differences in VAS scores within 12 h postoperatively among three groups, and however, significantly lower VAS scores were found at 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively in group C when comparing to Group A (p < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the incidence of postoperative flatulence and nausea and vomiting, the number of patients needed rescuing sufentanil in PACU, the length of postoperative hospital stay and the number of patients requiring non-steroidal analgesics at ward within 48 h postoperation.

Conclusions

Intravenous lidocaine infusion together with patient-controlled analgesia of sufentanil expedited the early recovery of gastrointestinal function and improved analgesic quality of sefentanyl in patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgeries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cosman F, Krege JH, Looker AC, Schousboe JT, Fan B, Sarafrazi Isfahani N et al (2017) Spine fracture prevalence in a nationally representative sample of US women and men aged ≥40 years: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2014. Osteoporos Int 28(6):1857–1866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Saclarides TJ (2006) Current choices–good or bad–for the proactive management of postoperative ileus: a surgeon’s view. J Perianesth Nurs 21(2A Suppl):S7-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Viscusi ER, Gan TJ, Leslie JB, Foss JF, Talon MD, Du W et al (2009) Peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists and postoperative ileus: mechanisms of action and clinical applicability. Anesth Analg 108(6):1811–1822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doorly MG, Senagore AJ (2012) Pathogenesis and clinical and economic consequences of postoperative ileus. Surg Clin N Am 92(2):259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaussier M, Delbos A, Maurice-Szamburski A, Ecoffey C, Mercadal L (2018) Perioperative use of intravenous Lidocaine. Drugs 78(12):1229–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dewinter G, Moens P, Fieuws S, Vanaudenaerde B, Van de Velde M, Rex S (2017) Systemic lidocaine fails to improve postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative recovery and quality of life in patients undergoing posterior spinal arthrodesis A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 118(4):576–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooke C, Kennedy ED, Foo I, Nimmo S, Speake D, Paterson HM et al (2019) Meta-analysis of the effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on return of gastrointestinal function after colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 23(1):15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn LK, Durieux ME (2017) Perioperative use of intravenous lidocaine. Anesthesiology 126:729–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan JS, Yousuf M, Victor JC, Sharma A, Siddiqui N (2016) An estimation for an appropriate end time for an intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion in bowel surgery: a comparative meta analysis. J Clin Anesth 28:95–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wood KB, Li W, Lebl DR, Lebl DS, Ploumis A (2014) Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine J 14(1):145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Verheijden S, Boeckxstaens GE (2018) Neuroimmune interaction and the regulation of intestinal immune homeostasis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 314(1):G75–G80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harnsberger CR, Maykel JA, Alavi K (2019) Postoperative Ileus. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 32(3):166–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwenk ES, Grant AE, Torjman MC, McNulty SE, Baratta JL, Viscusi ER (2017) The efficacy of peripheral opioid antagonists in opioid-induced constipation and postoperative ileus: a systematic review of the literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med 42(6):767–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Müller-Lissner S, Bassotti G, Coffin B, Drewes AM, Breivik H, Eisenberg E et al (2017) Opioid-induced constipation and bowel dysfunction: a clinical guideline. Pain Med 18(10):1837–1863

    Google Scholar 

  15. Candy B, Jones L, Vickerstaff V, Larkin PJ, Stone P (2018) Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD006332

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mozaffari S, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M (2018) Investigational opioid antagonists for treating opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 27(3):235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Farag E, Ghobrial M, Sessler DI, Dalton JE, Liu J, Lee JH et al (2013) Effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine administration on pain, opioid consumption, and quality of life after complex spine surgery. Anesthesiology 119(4):932–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carli F, Trudel JL, Belliveau P (2001) The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 44(8):1083–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN (2015) Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr 34(3):367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rimbäck G, Cassuto J, Tollesson PO (1990) Treatment of postoperative paralytic ileus by intravenous lidocaine infusion. Anesth Analg 70(4):414–419

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM (1995) Epidural anesthesia and analgesia their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 82(6):1474–1506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuo CP, Jao SW, Chen KM, Wong CS, Yeh CC, Sheen MJ et al (2006) Comparison of the effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and iv infusion with lidocaine on cytokine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Br J Anaesth 97(5):640–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schönherr ME, Kaulitz G, Hahnenkamp K, Friess H et al (2007) Systemic lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 246(2):192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harvey KP, Adair JD, Isho M, Robinson R (2009) Can intravenous lidocaine decrease postsurgical ileus and shorten hospital stay in elective bowel surgery? A pilot study and literature review. Am J Surg 198(2):231–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi GJ, Kang H, Ahn EJ, Oh JI, Baek CW, Jung YH et al (2016) Clinical efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for thyroidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial. World J Surg 40(12):2941–2947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grady P, Clark N, Lenahan J, Oudekerk C, Hawkins R, Nezat G et al (2012) Effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative pain and return of bowel function after laparoscopic abdominal gynecologic procedures. AANA J 80(4):282–288

    Google Scholar 

  27. Song X, Sun Y, Zhang X, Li T, Yang B (2017) Effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative recovery following laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-A randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 45:8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tauzin-Fin P, Bernard O, Sesay M, Biais M, Richebe P, Quinart A et al (2014) Benefits of intravenous lidocaine on post-operative pain and acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 30(3):366–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ho MLJ, Kerr SJ, Stevens J (2018) Intravenous lidocaine infusions for 48 hours in open colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol 71(1):57–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maquoi I, Joris JL, Dresse C, Vandenbosch S, Venneman I, Brichant JF et al (2016) Transversus abdominis plane block or intravenous lignocaine in open prostate surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 60(10):1453–1460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Supported by Science & Technology Projects from Science & Technology Bureau of Wenzhou city (No. Y20210125, Wangning Shangguan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wangning Shangguan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Wu, D., Chen, F. et al. Intravenous lidocaine simultaneously infused with sufentanil to accelerate gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after thoracolumbar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study. Eur Spine J 32, 313–320 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07456-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07456-9

Keywords

Navigation