Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical management of high-grade paediatric spondylolisthesis: meta-analysis and systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is currently no consensus on the management of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in paediatric populations. The objective of this analysis is to compare the outcomes of reduction followed by fusion (RFF) or in situ fusion (ISF) in paediatric patients.

Methods

Using major databases, a systematic literature search was performed. Primary studies comparing ISF with RFF in paediatric and adolescent patients were identified. Study data including patient-reported outcomes, complications, and spinopelvic parameters were collected and analysed.

Results

Seven studies were included, comprising 97 ISF and 131 RFF. Average patient age was 14.4 ± 2.1 years and follow up was 8.2 ± 5.1 years. Patients undergoing RFF compared to patients undergoing ISF alone were less likely to develop pseudarthrosis (RR 0.51, 95% CI, [0.26, 0.99], p = 0.05). On average, RFF led to 11.97º more reduction in slip angle and 34.8% more reduction in sagittal translation (p < 0.00001) compared to ISF. There was no significant difference between patient satisfaction and pain at follow up. Neurologic complications and reoperation rates were not significantly different.

Conclusions

Both RFF and ISF are effective techniques for managing HGS. Performing a reduction followed by fusion reduces the likelihood of pseudarthrosis in paediatric patients. The difference between risk of neurologic complications, need for reoperation, patient satisfaction, and pain outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Correlation with patient-reported outcomes still needs to be further explored.

Level 3 evidence

Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang RP, Bohlman HH, Thompson GH, Poe-Kochert C (2003) Predictive value of pelvic incidence in progression of spondylolisthesis. Spine 28:2381–2385. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000085325.42542.38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lundine KM, Lewis SJ, Al-Aubaidi Z, Alman B, Howard AW (2014) Patient outcomes in the operative and nonoperative management of high-grade spondylolisthesis in children. J Pediatr Orthop 34:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xue X, Wei X, Li L (2016) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for high-grade spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 95:e3070. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003070

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lonstein JE (1999) Spondylolisthesis in children: cause, natural history, and management. Spine 24:2640–2648. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199912150-00011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mataliotakis GI, Tsirikos AI (2017) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: current concepts and treatment. Orthop Trauma 31:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2017.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beck AW, Simpson AK (2019) High-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 30:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2019.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rocos B, Strantzas S, Zeller R, Lewis S, Tan T, Lebel D (2020) What is the optimal surgical method for achieving correction and avoiding neurological complications in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis? J Pediatr Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Transfeldt EE, Mehbod AA (2007) Evidence-based medicine analysis of isthmic spondylolisthesis treatment including reduction versus fusion in situ for high-grade slips. Spine 32:S126-129. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145b353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman BL 3rd, Donati NL (1989) Spinal arthrodesis for severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:594–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiltse LL, Jackson DW (1976) Treatment of spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1(117):92–100

    Google Scholar 

  11. Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T, Tervahartiala P, Schlenzka D, Yrjönen T, Osterman K, Seitsalo S, Helenius I (2006) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome. Spine 31:582–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000201401.17944.f7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bai X, Chen J, Liu L, Li X, Wu Y, Wang D, Ruan D (2017) Is reduction better than arthrodesis in situ in surgical management of low-grade spondylolisthesis? a system review and meta analysis. Eur Spine J 26:606–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4810-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seitsalo S, Osterman K, Poussa M, Laurent LE (1988) Spondylolisthesis in children under 12 years of age: long-term results of 56 patients treated conservatively or operatively. J Pediatr Orthop 8:516–521. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198809000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mac-Thiong J-M, Labelle H (2006) A proposal for a surgical classification of pediatric lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on current literature. Eur spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 15:1425–1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0101-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mac-Thiong J-M, Labelle H (2006) Classification of pediatric lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Stud Health Technol Inform 123:141–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang W, Aubin C-E, Cahill P, Baran G, Arnoux P-J, Parent S, Labelle H (2016) Biomechanics of high-grade spondylolisthesis with and without reduction. Med Biol Eng Comput 54:619–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1353-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Chopin D, Berthonnaud E, Hresko T, O’Brien M (2008) Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis. Eur spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 17:1170–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0713-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Longo UG, Loppini M, Romeo G, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2014) Evidence-based surgical management of spondylolisthesis: reduction or arthrodesis in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:53–58. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang G, Ye C, Luo J, Chen W (2017) Which is the optimum surgical strategy for spondylolisthesis: reduction or fusion in situ? A meta-analysis from 12 comparative studies. Int J Surg 42:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lak AM, Abunimer AM, Devi S, Chawla S, Aydin L, Tafel I, Smith TR, Mekary RA, Zaidi HA (2020) Reduction versus in situ fusion for adult high-grade spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 138:512-520.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fu K-MG, Smith JS, Polly DWJ, Perra JH, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DRJ, Hart RA, Donaldson WF 3rd, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI (2011) Morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of six hundred five pediatric patients with isthmic or dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Spine 36:308–312. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cf3a1d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koucheki R, Rocos B, Gandhi R, Lewis S, Lebel D Surgical Management of High-Grade Paediatric Spondylolisthesis: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021230749

  23. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savović J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration{\textquoteright}s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch V (2020) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1. Cochrane

  25. Burkus JK, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, Denis F (1992) Long-term evaluation of adolescents treated operatively for spondylolisthesis. A comparison of in situ arthrodesis only with in situ arthrodesis and reduction followed by immobilization in a cast. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:693–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Ungacta FF, Riew KD (1999) Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 24:1701–1711. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908150-00012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Muschik M, Zippel H, Perka C (1997) Surgical management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: anterior fusion in situ versus anterior spondylodesis with posterior transpedicular instrumentation and reduction. Spine 22:2036–2042. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199709010-00020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Ylikoski M, Hurri H, Osterman K (1993) Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents: reduction or fusion in situ. Spine 18:894–901. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199306000-00014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Martiniani M, Lamartina C, Specchia N (2012) “In situ” fusion or reduction in high-grade high dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (HDSS). Eur spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 21(Suppl 1):S134–S140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2230-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Parvizi J, Kim GK (2010) Chapter 210 - Spondylolisthesis. In: Parvizi J, Kim GKBT-HYO (eds). W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 438–440

  31. O’Brien JP, Mehdian H, Jaffray D (1994) Reduction of severe lumbosacral spondylolisthesis: a report of 22 cases with a ten-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sailhan F, Gollogly S, Roussouly P (2006) The radiographic results and neurologic complications of instrumented reduction and fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis without decompression of the neural elements: a retrospective review of 44 patients. Spine 31:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000194780.17528.6b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, Kummer FJ, Neuwirth MG (1996) An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine 21:1133–1138. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199605150-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schär RT, Sutter M, Mannion AF, Eggspühler A, Jeszenszky D, Fekete TF, Kleinstück F, Haschtmann D (2017) Outcome of L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of high-grade L5–S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Eur Spine J 26:679–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4964-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller M, Thompson S (2019) Miller’s Review of Orthopaedics, 8th edn. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nielsen E, Andras LM, Siddiqui AA, Michael N, Garg S, Paloski M, Brighton BK, Ferrero E, Mazda K, Ilharreborde B, Skaggs DL (2020) 40% reoperation rate in adolescents with spondylolisthesis. Spine Deform 8:1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00121-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Labelle H, Mac-Thiong J-M, Roussouly P (2011) Spino-pelvic sagittal balance of spondylolisthesis: a review and classification. Eur spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20(Suppl 5):641–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1932-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Lebel.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

Conflict of interest statement None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koucheki, R., Rocos, B., Gandhi, R. et al. Surgical management of high-grade paediatric spondylolisthesis: meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur Spine J 32, 436–446 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07408-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07408-3

Keywords

Navigation