Skip to main content

Anatomical analysis of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate and describe the morphologic features of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination (BI) for informing the placement of pedicle screws. C2 pedicle screw placement is an important surgical technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability in patients with BI. However, no systematic and comprehensive anatomical study of the C2 pedicle in patients with BI has been reported.

Methods

The data from 100 patients diagnosed with BI (BI group) and 100 patients without head or cervical disease (control group) were included in the study. Radiographic parameters, including the pedicle width, length, height, transverse angle, lamina angle, and superior angle, were measured and analyzed on CT images. After summary analysis, the effect of C2–3 congenital fusion on C2 pedicle deformity in patients with BI was also investigated.

Results

The width, length, and height of the C2 pedicle of the BI patients were smaller than those of the control group. The pedicle cancellous bone was smaller in the BI group, while no significant difference in cortical bone was observed. In total, 44% of the pedicles were smaller than 4.5 mm in the BI group. Patients with C2–3 congenital fusion presented with smaller pedicle transverse angles and larger pedicle superior angles than those without fusion. Wide variations in the left and right angles of the pedicle were observed in the BI group with atlantoaxial dislocation or atlantooccipital fusion.

Conclusion

The C2 pedicle in the BI group was thinner than that in the control group due to a smaller cortical bone. Cases of C2–3 congenital fusion, atlantoaxial dislocation, and atlantooccipital fusion displayed variation in the angle of the C2 pedicle.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Goel A (2017) Short neck, short head, short spine, and short body height—hallmarks of basilar invagination. J Craniovertebral Junction Spine 8:165–167. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_101_17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ji W, Lin S, Bao M, Zou X, Ge S, Ma X, Chen J, Yang J (2020) Anatomical analysis of the occipital bone in patients with basilar invagination: a computed tomography-based study. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 20:866–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Abel MF, Menezes AH (2010) Basilar invagination. Neurosurgery 66:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000365770.10690.6F

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diniz JM, Botelho RV (2020) The role of clivus length and cranial base flexion angle in basilar invagination and Chiari malformation pathophysiology. Neurol Sci Off J Ital Neurol Soc Ital Soc Clin Neurophysiol 41:1751–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04248-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vasconcelos BB, Nascimento JJC, Valenca MM, Silva-Neto EJ, Diniz PRB, Araujo-Neto SA (2020) Is Basilar invagination related with stenosis of the hypoglossal nerve canal? World Neurosurg 137:e354–e357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang SL, Wang C, Leng HJ, Zhao WD, Yan M, Zhou HT (2016) Pedicle screw combined with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of basilar invagination and congenital C2–C3 fusion. Clin Spine Surg 29:448–453

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goel A (2020) Basilar invagination: instability is the cause and stabilization is the treatment. Neurospine 17:585–587. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040522.261

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Meng XZ, Xu JX (2011) The options of C2 fixation for os odontoideum: a radiographic study for the C2 pedicle and lamina anatomy. Eur Spine J 20:1921–1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1893-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Goel A, Jankharia B, Shah A, Sathe P (2016) Three-dimensional models: an emerging investigational revolution for craniovertebral junction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 25:740–744. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.4.SPINE151268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Pape S, Gauthe R, Latrobe C, Cantogrel P, Proust F, Leroux J, Ould-Slimane M (2016) Are C2 pedicles always screwable? Calibration and planning with a pedicle–lamina angle. Neurochirurgie 62:209–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2015.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Su CH, Chen Z, Wu H, Jian FZ (2021) Computed tomographic angiography to analyze dangerous vertebral artery anomalies at the craniovertebral junction in patients with basilar invagination. Clin Neurol Neurosur. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Howington JU, Kruse JJ, Awasthi D (2001) Surgical anatomy of the C-2 pedicle. J Neurosurg 95:88–92. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2001.95.1.0088

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karaikovic EE, Daubs MD, Madsen RW, Gaines RW Jr (1997) Morphologic characteristics of human cervical pedicles. Spine 22:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199703010-00005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Du YQ, Yin YH, Qiao GY, Yu XG (2020) C2 medial pedicle screw: a novel “in-out-in” technique as an alternative option for posterior C2 fixation in cases with a narrow C2 isthmus. J Neurosurg Spine 33:281–287. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.2.SPINE191517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chamberlain WE (1939) Basilar impression (platybasia): a bizarre developmental anomaly of the occipital bone and upper cervical spine with striking and misleading neurologic manifestations. Yale J Biol Med 11:487–496

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo X, Han Z, Xiao JJ, Chen QX, Chen F, Guo QF, Yang J, Ni B (2019) Cervicomedullary angle as an independent radiological predictor of postoperative neurological outcome in type A basilar invagination. Sci Rep Uk. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-019-55780-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ji W, Xu X, Wu Z, Liu X, Kong G, Huang Z, Chen J (2018) Radiological evaluation of craniocervical region in patients with basilar invagination. Spine 43:E1305–E1312. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin S, Bao M, Wang Z, Zou X, Ge S, Ma X, Chen J, Ji W, Yang J (2021) Morphological evaluation of the subaxial cervical spine in patients with basilar invagination: a CT-based study. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neo M, Sakamoto T, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T (2005) The clinical risk of vertebral artery injury from cervical pedicle screws inserted in degenerative vertebrae. Spine 30:2800–2805. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000192297.07709.5d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith ZA, Bistazzoni S, Onibokun A, Chen NF, Sassi M, Khoo LT (2010) Anatomical considerations for subaxial (C2) pedicle screw placement: a radiographic study with computed tomography in 93 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:176–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b40234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu R, Nadaud MC, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (1995) Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle axis. Spine 20:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199502000-00001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S, Wang C, Passias PG, Yan M, Zhou H (2010) Pedicle versus laminar screws: what provides more suitable C2 fixation in congenital C2–3 fusion patients? Eur Spine J 19:1306–1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1418-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Finn MA, Fassett DR, McCall TD, Clark R, Dailey AT, Brodke DS (2008) The cervical end of an occipitocervical fusion: a biomechanical evaluation of 3 constructs. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 9:296–300. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/9/9/296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yeom JS, Buchowski JM, Kim HJ, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD (2013) Risk of vertebral artery injury: comparison between C1–C2 transarticular and C2 pedicle screws. Spine J 13:775–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yeom JS, Buchowski JM, Park KW, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD (2008) Undetected vertebral artery groove and foramen violations during C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E942–E949. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181870441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Neo M, Matsushita M, Iwashita Y, Yasuda T, Sakamoto T, Nakamura T (2003) Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation for a high-riding vertebral artery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) 28:666–670. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000051919.14927.57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li T, Yin YH, Qiao GY, Wang HW, Yu XG (2019) Three-Dimensional evaluation and classification of the anatomy variations of vertebral artery at the craniovertebral junction in 120 patients of basilar invagination and atlas occipitalization. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 17:594–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Salunke P, Singh A, Karthigeyan M (2020) Technique of C2 subfacetal screw in patients with high-riding vertebral artery. World Neurosurg 144:59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dorward IG, Wright NM (2011) Seven years of experience with C2 translaminar screw fixation: clinical series and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 68:1491–1499. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212a4d7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lehman RA Jr, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson MD, Sasso RC, Kuklo TR, Riew KD (2008) Salvage of C2 pedicle and pars screws using the intralaminar technique: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:960–965. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c915b

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiangyang Ma, Jianting Chen or Jincheng Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no sources of support or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, R., Hou, J., Zhou, Y. et al. Anatomical analysis of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination. Eur Spine J (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07258-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07258-z

Keywords

  • Basilar invagination
  • Pedicle screws
  • Anatomy
  • Computed tomography
  • Malformation
  • C2 pedicle