Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The medial window technique as a salvage method to insert C2 pedicle screw in the case of a high-riding vertebral artery or narrow pedicle: a technical note and case series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the safety and feasibility of C2 medial window screw (C2MWS) as an alternative salvage method for C2 pedicle screws in cases of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) or narrow pedicle.

Methods

The C2MWS technique involves screw insertion by intentionally breaching the medial cortex of the pedicle to avoid vertebral artery injury. Twelve patients who underwent C2 screw insertion via the C2MWS were retrospectively reviewed. C2MWS was indicated in cases of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) or narrow pedicle (pedicle width ≤ 4 mm). The width of the canal breach by screw, vertebral artery groove (VAG) breach, solid fusion, neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were assessed as outcome measurements.

Results

C2MWS was indicated due to both HRVA and narrow pedicle for 11 screws, narrow pedicle for one screw, and HRVA for two screws. No screw VAG breach or vertebral artery injury was noted postoperatively. The mean width of canal breach was 2.9 ± 1.3 mm. There were no cases demonstrating neurologic deterioration, and 11 patients (91.7%) demonstrated solid fusion at 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, neck pain VAS and JOA scores significantly improved after the surgery.

Conclusions

The C2MWS technique can provide 3-column fixation while reliably avoiding VA injury. C2MWS could be considered as a salvage alternative method when the insertion of C2 pedicle screw is complicated by HRVA or a narrow pedicle, while there is a need to provide firmer fixation strength than that provided by pars or translaminar screws.

Level of evidence

4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP (2002) Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 51:1351–1356 (Discussion 1356–1357)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2467–2471. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200111150-00014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Punyarat P, Buchowski JM, Klawson BT, Peters C, Lertudomphonwanit T, Riew KD (2018) Freehand technique for C2 pedicle and pars screw placement: is it safe? Spine J 18:1197–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang DG, Hao DJ, He BR, Wu QN, Liu TJ, Wang XD, Guo H, Fang XY (2015) Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: a review of all techniques. Spine J 15:2271–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Du JY, Aichmair A, Kueper J, Wright T, Lebl DR (2015) Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 22:151–161. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.SPINE13805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeom JS, Buchowski JM, Kim HJ, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD (2013) Risk of vertebral artery injury: comparison between C1–C2 transarticular and C2 pedicle screws. Spine J 13:775–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maki S, Koda M, Iijima Y, Furuya T, Inada T, Kamiya K, Ota M, Saito J, Okawa A, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M (2016) Medially-shifted rather than high-riding vertebral arteries preclude safe pedicle screw insertion. J Clin Neurosci 29:169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.11.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida M, Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T (2006) Comparison of the anatomical risk for vertebral artery injury associated with the C2-pedicle screw and atlantoaxial transarticular screw. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E513–E517. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000224516.29747.52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehman RA Jr, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson MD, Sasso RC, Kuklo TR, Riew KD (2008) Salvage of C2 pedicle and pars screws using the intralaminar technique: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:960–965. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c915b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorward IG, Wright NM (2011) Seven years of experience with C2 translaminar screw fixation: clinical series and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 68:1491–1499. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212a4d7 (Discussion 1499)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu Y, Lee YP, Bhatia NN, Lee TQ (2019) Biomechanical comparison of C1 lateral mass-C2 short pedicle screw-C3 lateral mass screw-rod construct versus goel-harms fixation for atlantoaxial instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:E393–E399. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neo M, Matsushita M, Yasuda T, Sakamoto T, Nakamura T (2002) Use of an aiming device in posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. Techn Note J Neurosurg 97:123–127. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2002.97.1.0123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bloch O, Holly LT, Park J, Obasi C, Kim K, Johnson JP (2001) Effect of frameless stereotaxy on the accuracy of C1–2 transarticular screw placement. J Neurosurg 95:74–79. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2001.95.1.0074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim GU, Chang MC, Kim TU, Lee GW (2020) Diagnostic modality in spine disease: a review. Asian Spine J 14:910–920. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0593

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan AKH, Yusof MI, Abdullah MS (2021) Computed tomographic morphometric analysis of C1 and C2 for lamina cross screw placement in Malay ethnicity. Asian Spine J 15:1–8. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim GU, Lee GW (2020) The C2 cortical screw, an alternative fixation technique for the C2 segment during high cervical spine surgery: technical note. World Neurosurg 142:24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Su BW, Shimer AL, Chinthakunta S, Salloum K, Ames CP, Vaccaro AR, Bucklen B (2014) Comparison of fatigue strength of C2 pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, and a hybrid construct in C1–C2 fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E12–E19. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeom JS, Buchowski JM, Park KW, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD (2008) Undetected vertebral artery groove and foramen violations during C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E942–E949. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181870441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Neo M, Matsushita M, Iwashita Y, Yasuda T, Sakamoto T, Nakamura T (2003) Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation for a high-riding vertebral artery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:666–670. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000051919.14927.57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hlubek RJ, Bohl MA, Cole TS, Morgan CD, Xu DS, Chang SW, Turner JD, Kakarla UK (2018) Safety and accuracy of freehand versus navigated C2 pars or pedicle screw placement. Spine J 18:1374–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Du YQ, Yin YH, Qiao GY, Yu XG (2020) C2 medial pedicle screw: a novel “in-out-in” technique as an alternative option for posterior C2 fixation in cases with a narrow C2 isthmus. J Neurosurg Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.2.SPINE191517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan F, Yang HL, Guo KJ, Li JS, Xu K, Zhang ZM, Tang TS (2013) A clinical morphologic study of the C2 pedicle and isthmus. Eur Spine J 22:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2417-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lehman RA Jr, Dmitriev AE, Wilson KW (2012) Biomechanical analysis of the C2 intralaminar fixation technique using a cross-link and offset connector for an unstable atlantoaxial joint. Spine J 12:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.01.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kepler CC, Fang T, Bronson WH, Russo GS, Schroeder GD (2020) The C2 “parsicle” screw: introduction of a novel posterior surgical technique for upper cervical fixation. Clin Spine Surg 33:146–149. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Agrawal M, Devarajan LJ, Singh PK, Garg A, Kale SS (2018) Proposal of a new safety margin for placement of C2 pedicle screws on computed tomography angiography. World Neurosurg 120:e282–e289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jha SC, Miyazaki M, Tsumura H (2018) Kinetic change of spinal cord compression on flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 174:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bydon M, Mathios D, Macki M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Aygun N, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A, Wolinksy JP (2014) Accuracy of C2 pedicle screw placement using the anatomic freehand technique. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 125:24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sehan Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, DH., Park, S., Cho, J.H. et al. The medial window technique as a salvage method to insert C2 pedicle screw in the case of a high-riding vertebral artery or narrow pedicle: a technical note and case series. Eur Spine J 31, 1251–1259 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07146-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07146-6

Keywords

Navigation