Abstract
Purpose
To determine and compare the performance of zero echo imaging (ZTE) with conventional MRI sequences on lumbar osseous morphology in patients suspected with lumbar degeneration with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) as standard reference.
Methods
22 subjects with concerned lumbar degeneration were recruited. All subjects were scanned with ZTE sequence after routine conventional MR sequences on a 3.0 T system and also received MSCT examination. Image quality was assessed. The quantitative and qualitative parameters of lumbar osseous morphology on MSCT, ZTE and MRI images were evaluated by three musculoskeletal radiologists independently. Inter-reader and inter-modality reliability and the difference between the modalities were calculated.
Results
There was no difference for the osseous parameters between modalities, including axial orientation (p = 0.444), IAD (p = 0.381), lateral recess (p = 0.370), pedicle width (p = 0.067), pedicle height (p = 0.056), and osteophyte grade (p = 0.052). The measurement of the foramina diameter was statistically different between conventional MRI and MSCT (p < 0.05) but not between the MSCT and ZTE (p = 0.660). Conventional MRI was more likely to miss cortical bone abnormalities. ZTE appeared blurrier in cortical bone than MSCT, especially in cases with severe lumbar degeneration. The inter-reader agreement between MSCT and ZTE-MRI was higher than between MSCT and conventional MRI.
Conclusions
ZTE-MRI could offer more cortical bone details than conventional MRI images and might be a valid alternative to CT for lumbar osseous morphology assessment to some extent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shamji MF, Mroz T, Hsu W, Chutkan N (2015) Management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. Neurosurgery 77(Suppl 4):S68-74
Kalichman L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Li L, Hunter DJ (2009) Facet orientation and tropism: associations with facet joint osteoarthritis and degeneratives. Spine 34:E579-585
Santiago FR, Milena GL, Herrera RO, Romero PA, Plazas PG (2001) Morphometry of the lower lumbar vertebrae in patients with and without low back pain. Eur Spine J 10:228–233
Carr MW, Grey ML (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Nurs 102:26–33
Du J, Carl M, Bydder M, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM (2010) Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone. J Magn Reson 207:304–311
Shanechi AM, Kiczek M, Khan M, Jindal G (2019) Spine anatomy imaging: an update. Neuroimag Clin N Am 29:461–480
Weiger M, Pruessmann KP (2019) Short-T2 MRI: principles and recent advances. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 114–115:237–270
Larson PE, Han M, Krug R, Jakary A, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB, Henry RG, McKinnon G, Kelley DA (2016) Ultrashort echo time and zero echo time MRI at 7T. MAGMA 29:359–370
Weiger M, Brunner DO, Dietrich BE, Muller CF, Pruessmann KP (2013) ZTE imaging in humans. Magn Reson Med 70:328–332
Lee C, Jeon KJ, Han SS, Kim YH, Choi YJ, Lee A, Choi JH (2020) CT-like MRI using the zero-TE technique for osseous changes of the TMJ. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 49:20190272
de Mello RAF, Ma YJ, Ashir A, Jerban S, Hoenecke H, Carl M, Du J, Chang EY (2020) Three-dimensional zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging versus 3-dimensional computed tomography for glenoid bone assessment. Arthroscopy 36:2391–2400
Breighner RE, Bogner EA, Lee SC, Koff MF, Potter HG (2019) Evaluation of osseous morphology of the hip using zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 47:3460–3468
Breighner RE, Endo Y, Konin GP, Gulotta LV, Koff MF, Potter HG (2018) Technical developments: zero echo time imaging of the shoulder: enhanced osseous detail by using MR imaging. Radiology 286:960–966
Argentieri EC, Koff MF, Breighner RE, Endo Y, Shah PH, Sneag DB (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of zero-echo time MRI for the evaluation of cervical neural foraminal stenosis. Spine 43:928–933
Delso G, Wiesinger F, Sacolick LI, Kaushik SS, Shanbhag DD, Hullner M, Veit-Haibach P (2015) Clinical evaluation of zero-echo-time MR imaging for the segmentation of the skull. J Nucl Med 56:417–422
Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, Gee JC (2010) N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imag 29:1310–1320
Vanharanta H, Floyd T, Ohnmeiss DD, Hochschuler SH, Guyer RD (1993) The relationship of facet tropism to degenerative disc disease. Spine 18:1000–1005
Noren R, Trafimow J, Andersson GB, Huckman MS (1991) The role of facet joint tropism and facet angle in disc degeneration. Spine 16:530–532
Abbas J, Peled N, Hershkovitz I, Hamoud K (2020) Pedicle morphometry variations in individuals with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Biomed Res Int 2020:7125914
Makino T, Kaito T, Fujiwara H, Yonenobu K (2012) Analysis of lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative spines using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography: what can be the reliable index for optimal pedicle screw diameter? Eur Spine J 21:1516–1521
Marchesi D, Schneider E, Glauser P, Aebi M (1988) Morphometric analysis of the thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicles, anatomo-radiologic study. Surg Radiol Anat 10:317–322
Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Boos N, Hodler J (1999) MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints. Skeletal Radiol 28:215–219
Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1987) Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology 164:227–230
Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Werner K, Claes L, Kettler A (2006) Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 15:720–730
Wei Z, Jang H, Bydder GM, Yang W, Ma YJ (2021) Fast T1 measurement of cortical bone using 3D UTE actual flip angle imaging and single-TR acquisition (3D UTE-AFI-STR). Magn Reson Med 85:3290–3298
Fritz B, Bensler S, Thawait GK, Raithel E, Stern SE, Fritz J (2019) CAIPIRINHA-accelerated 10-min 3D TSE MRI of the ankle for the diagnosis of painful ankle conditions: performance evaluation in 70 patients. Eur Radiol 29:609–619
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163
Bartko JJ (1966) The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep 19:3–11
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Berg L, Thoresen H, Neckelmann G, Furunes H, Hellum C, Espeland A (2019) Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI? Eur Radiol 29:4990–4998
Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ (1991) The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am 22:181–187
Acknowledgements
We thank to Weiyin Vivian Liu from GE health for her excellent technical support and advice on the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 31630025 and 81930045) National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 31630025, Xiaoming Li, No.81930045, Xiaoming Li
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hou, B., Liu, C., Li, Y. et al. Evaluation of the degenerative lumbar osseous morphology using zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging (ZTE-MRI). Eur Spine J 31, 792–800 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07099-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07099-2