Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the degenerative lumbar osseous morphology using zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging (ZTE-MRI)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine and compare the performance of zero echo imaging (ZTE) with conventional MRI sequences on lumbar osseous morphology in patients suspected with lumbar degeneration with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) as standard reference.

Methods

22 subjects with concerned lumbar degeneration were recruited. All subjects were scanned with ZTE sequence after routine conventional MR sequences on a 3.0 T system and also received MSCT examination. Image quality was assessed. The quantitative and qualitative parameters of lumbar osseous morphology on MSCT, ZTE and MRI images were evaluated by three musculoskeletal radiologists independently. Inter-reader and inter-modality reliability and the difference between the modalities were calculated.

Results

There was no difference for the osseous parameters between modalities, including axial orientation (p = 0.444), IAD (p = 0.381), lateral recess (p = 0.370), pedicle width (p = 0.067), pedicle height (p = 0.056), and osteophyte grade (p = 0.052). The measurement of the foramina diameter was statistically different between conventional MRI and MSCT (p < 0.05) but not between the MSCT and ZTE (p = 0.660). Conventional MRI was more likely to miss cortical bone abnormalities. ZTE appeared blurrier in cortical bone than MSCT, especially in cases with severe lumbar degeneration. The inter-reader agreement between MSCT and ZTE-MRI was higher than between MSCT and conventional MRI.

Conclusions

ZTE-MRI could offer more cortical bone details than conventional MRI images and might be a valid alternative to CT for lumbar osseous morphology assessment to some extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shamji MF, Mroz T, Hsu W, Chutkan N (2015) Management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. Neurosurgery 77(Suppl 4):S68-74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalichman L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Li L, Hunter DJ (2009) Facet orientation and tropism: associations with facet joint osteoarthritis and degeneratives. Spine 34:E579-585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Santiago FR, Milena GL, Herrera RO, Romero PA, Plazas PG (2001) Morphometry of the lower lumbar vertebrae in patients with and without low back pain. Eur Spine J 10:228–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carr MW, Grey ML (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Nurs 102:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Du J, Carl M, Bydder M, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM (2010) Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone. J Magn Reson 207:304–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shanechi AM, Kiczek M, Khan M, Jindal G (2019) Spine anatomy imaging: an update. Neuroimag Clin N Am 29:461–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP (2019) Short-T2 MRI: principles and recent advances. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 114–115:237–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Larson PE, Han M, Krug R, Jakary A, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB, Henry RG, McKinnon G, Kelley DA (2016) Ultrashort echo time and zero echo time MRI at 7T. MAGMA 29:359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiger M, Brunner DO, Dietrich BE, Muller CF, Pruessmann KP (2013) ZTE imaging in humans. Magn Reson Med 70:328–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee C, Jeon KJ, Han SS, Kim YH, Choi YJ, Lee A, Choi JH (2020) CT-like MRI using the zero-TE technique for osseous changes of the TMJ. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 49:20190272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Mello RAF, Ma YJ, Ashir A, Jerban S, Hoenecke H, Carl M, Du J, Chang EY (2020) Three-dimensional zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging versus 3-dimensional computed tomography for glenoid bone assessment. Arthroscopy 36:2391–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Breighner RE, Bogner EA, Lee SC, Koff MF, Potter HG (2019) Evaluation of osseous morphology of the hip using zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 47:3460–3468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Breighner RE, Endo Y, Konin GP, Gulotta LV, Koff MF, Potter HG (2018) Technical developments: zero echo time imaging of the shoulder: enhanced osseous detail by using MR imaging. Radiology 286:960–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Argentieri EC, Koff MF, Breighner RE, Endo Y, Shah PH, Sneag DB (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of zero-echo time MRI for the evaluation of cervical neural foraminal stenosis. Spine 43:928–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delso G, Wiesinger F, Sacolick LI, Kaushik SS, Shanbhag DD, Hullner M, Veit-Haibach P (2015) Clinical evaluation of zero-echo-time MR imaging for the segmentation of the skull. J Nucl Med 56:417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, Gee JC (2010) N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imag 29:1310–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vanharanta H, Floyd T, Ohnmeiss DD, Hochschuler SH, Guyer RD (1993) The relationship of facet tropism to degenerative disc disease. Spine 18:1000–1005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Noren R, Trafimow J, Andersson GB, Huckman MS (1991) The role of facet joint tropism and facet angle in disc degeneration. Spine 16:530–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abbas J, Peled N, Hershkovitz I, Hamoud K (2020) Pedicle morphometry variations in individuals with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Biomed Res Int 2020:7125914

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Makino T, Kaito T, Fujiwara H, Yonenobu K (2012) Analysis of lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative spines using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography: what can be the reliable index for optimal pedicle screw diameter? Eur Spine J 21:1516–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marchesi D, Schneider E, Glauser P, Aebi M (1988) Morphometric analysis of the thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicles, anatomo-radiologic study. Surg Radiol Anat 10:317–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Boos N, Hodler J (1999) MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints. Skeletal Radiol 28:215–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1987) Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology 164:227–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Werner K, Claes L, Kettler A (2006) Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 15:720–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei Z, Jang H, Bydder GM, Yang W, Ma YJ (2021) Fast T1 measurement of cortical bone using 3D UTE actual flip angle imaging and single-TR acquisition (3D UTE-AFI-STR). Magn Reson Med 85:3290–3298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fritz B, Bensler S, Thawait GK, Raithel E, Stern SE, Fritz J (2019) CAIPIRINHA-accelerated 10-min 3D TSE MRI of the ankle for the diagnosis of painful ankle conditions: performance evaluation in 70 patients. Eur Radiol 29:609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bartko JJ (1966) The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep 19:3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Berg L, Thoresen H, Neckelmann G, Furunes H, Hellum C, Espeland A (2019) Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI? Eur Radiol 29:4990–4998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ (1991) The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am 22:181–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank to Weiyin Vivian Liu from GE health for her excellent technical support and advice on the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 31630025 and 81930045) National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 31630025, Xiaoming Li, No.81930045, Xiaoming Li

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weiyin Vivian Liu or Xiaoming Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, B., Liu, C., Li, Y. et al. Evaluation of the degenerative lumbar osseous morphology using zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging (ZTE-MRI). Eur Spine J 31, 792–800 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07099-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07099-2

Keywords

Navigation