Abstract
Objective
To determine the superiority of decubitus and supine radiographs for the reduction of olisthesis instead of the extension radiograph, and the inconsistency of the CT scout view, 3D-reconstruction and MR image in evaluating segmental instability.
Methods
A cohort of 154 low-grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis patients with the average age of (60.9 ± 8.6) years were enrolled. Slip percentage was measured on the flexion, upright and extension radiographs, the decubitus lateral radiograph, CT scout view, the supine median sagittal 3D-reconstruction and MR image. The translational range of motion was calculated, and segmental instability was defined as translational motion ≥ 8%.
Results
The flexion radiograph showed higher slip percentage than upright radiograph (p < 0.001). The slip percentage of the MR image was lower than CT scout view (p = 0.003) and CT sagittal radiograph (p = 0.001) on the basis of statistical differences among three groups (p = 0.002). The slip percentage of the CT scout view, decubitus radiograph, and extension radiograph was statistically different (p = 0.01). The CT scout view and sagittal reconstruction had lower slip percentage than the extension radiograph (p = 0.042; p = 0.003, respectively). Both the flexion-supine and flexion-decubitus modality had larger translational motion than the flexion–extension modality (p = 0.007; p < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
Many modalities and techniques are used to show the vertebral displacement and its possible change and any cane used in the daily practice. In this study, supine and decubitus lateral radiography have larger reduction of olisthesis than the extension radiograph. The flexion radiograph coupled with a supine or decubitus radiograph reveals greater mobility than the flexion–extension modality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhou QS, Sun X, Chen X, Xu L, Qian BP, Zhu Z, Qiu Y (2021) Utility of natural sitting lateral radiograph in the diagnosis of segmental instability for patients with degenerative lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 479(4):817–825. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001542
Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, Coumans JV, Harrington JF, Amin-Hanjani S, Schwartz JS, Sonntag VK, Barker FG 2nd, Benzel EC (2016) Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar Spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 374(15):1424–1434. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1508788
Chen X, Zhou QS, Xu L, Chen ZH, Zhu ZZ, Li S, Qiu Y, Sun X (2018) Does kyphotic configuration on upright lateral radiograph correlate with instability in patients with degenerative lumbar Spondylolisthesis? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 173:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.07.020
Simmonds AM, Rampersaud YR, Dvorak MF, Dea N, Melnyk AD, Fisher CG (2015) Defining the inherent stability of degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 23(2):178–189. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.SPINE1426
Câmara JR, Keen JR, Asgarzadie F (2015) Functional radiography in examination of spondylolisthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(4):W461–W469. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13139
Tarpada SP, Cho W, Chen F, Amorosa LF (2018) Utility of supine lateral radiographs for assessment of Lumbar segmental instability in degenerative lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Spine 43(18):1275–1280. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002604
Liu N, Wood KB, Schwab JH, Cha TD, Pedlow FX Jr, Puhkan RD, Hyzog TL (2015) Utility of flexion-extension radiographs in lumbar Spondylolisthesis: a prospective study. Spine 40(16):E929–E935. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000941
Hey HW, Lau ET, Lim JL, Choong DA, Tan CS, Liu GK, Wong HK (2017) Slump sitting X-ray of the lumbar spine is superior to the conventional flexion view in assessing lumbar spine instability. Spin J : Off J North Am Spin Soc 17(3):360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.003
Even JL, Chen AF, Lee JY (2014) Imaging characteristics of “dynamic” versus “static” spondylolisthesis: analysis using magnetic resonance imaging and flexion/extension films. Spin J : Off J North Am Spin Soc 14(9):1965–1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.057
Wood KB, Popp CA, Transfeldt EE, Geissele AE (1994) Radiographic evaluation of instability in spondylolisthesis. Spine 19(15):1697–1703. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199408000-00008
Kuhns BD, Kouk S, Buchanan C, Lubelski D, Alvin MD, Benzel EC, Mroz TE, Tozzi J (2015) Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of mobile and nonmobile L4–L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spin J : Off J North Am Spin Soc 15(9):1956–1962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.006
Cabraja M, Mohamed E, Koeppen D, Kroppenstedt S (2012) The analysis of segmental mobility with different lumbar radiographs in symptomatic patients with a spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J : Off Pub Eur Spin Soc Eur Spin Deform Soc, Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 21(2):256–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1870-y
Landi A, Gregori F, Marotta N, Donnarumma P, Delfini R (2015) Hidden spondylolisthesis: unrecognized cause of low back pain? Prospective study about the use of dynamic projections in standing and recumbent position for the individuation of lumbar instability. Neuroradiology 57(6):583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1513-9
Hey H, Lau ET, Tan KA, Lim JL, Choong D, Lau LL, Liu KG, Wong HK (2017) Lumbar spine alignment in six common postures: an ROM analysis with implications for deformity correction. Spine 42(19):1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002131
Luk KD, Chow DH, Holmes A (2003) Vertical instability in spondylolisthesis: a traction radiographic assessment technique and the principle of management. Spine 28(8):819–827. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200304150-00016
Dupuis PR, Yong-Hing K, Cassidy JD, Kirkaldy-Willis WH (1985) Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability. Spine 10(3):262–276. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198504000-00015
Kanno H, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Aizawa T, Ishii Y, Itoi E (2015) Changes in lumbar spondylolisthesis on axial-loaded MRI: Do they reproduce the positional changes in the degree of olisthesis observed on X-ray images in the standing position? Spin J : Off J North Am Spin Soc 15(6):1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.016
Funding
One of the authors (Xu Sun) has received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81772422) and another author (Yong Qiu) has received funding from Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Center (YXZXA2016009). The Manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
This study had no violation of ethics, and was approved by the IRB (registry number 2021-398-01).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Q., Sun, X., Qiu, Y. et al. Utility of the decubitus or the supine rather than the extension lateral radiograph in evaluating lumbar segmental instability. Eur Spine J 31, 851–857 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07098-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07098-3