Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of junctional kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis: can it be corrected at final fusion?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the risk and predictive factors of junctional issues after conversion from Traditional growing rod (TGR) to definitive spinal fusion in Early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

Methods

Retrospective review of a multicenter EOS database. TGR patients who received final fusion with at least two-year follow-up were included. Proximal (PJA) and Distal junctional angles (DJA) on pre-final fusion, post-final fusion (within one year of surgery), and at latest follow-up were measured on lateral upright spinal radiographs. Differences in values among designated time points and predictive factors of junctional issues were evaluated statistically.

Results

Forty-six of 251 patients (28 females, 18 males and mean age at final fusion: 12 ± 2 [9–17] years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up between first postoperative measurement and latest follow-up was 49 ± 22 (24–112) months. No statistical differences in PJA and DJA values were available at pre-fusion, first post-fusion, or latest follow-up (p = 0.827, p = 0.076). Fifty percent of patients had extension of TGR instrumentation at fusion, either proximal or distal. No factor including sex and etiology, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, major curve magnitude, PJA, and DJA at pre-fusion was found to be a predictive issue for extension of index TGR instrumentation, except the history of at least one implant-related complication during the period from index surgery to the definitive fusion.

Conclusion

PJA and DJA remained stable when transitioning from TGR to final posterior spinal fusion. But 50% of patients had extension of construction at fusion, either proximal or distal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available upon request.

References

  1. Akbarnia BA (2007) Management themes in early onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pizones J, Martín-Buitrago MP, Sánchez Márquez JM, Fernández-Baillo N, Baldan-Martin M, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ (2018) Decision making of graduation in patients with early-onset scoliosis at the end of distraction-based programs: risks and benefits of definitive fusion. Spine Deform 6:308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Watanabe K, Uno K, Suzuki T, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Yanagida H, Ito M, Hirano T, Yamazaki K, Minami S, Taneichi H, Imagama S, Takeshita K, Yamamoto T, Matsumoto M (2016) Risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis associated with dual-rod growing-rod surgery for early-onset scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg 29:E428–E433. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Hawary R, Sturm P, Cahill P, Samdani A, Vitale M, Gabos P, Bodin N, d’Amato C, Harris C, Al Khudairy A, Smith JT (2017) What is the risk of developing proximal junctional kyphosis during growth friendly treatments for early-onset scoliosis? J Pediatr Orthop 37:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pan A, Hai Y, Yang J, Zhang Y, Zhang Y (2018) Upper instrumented vertebrae distal to T2 leads to a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis during growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg 31:E337–E341. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO, Clements DH 3rd, Betz RR, Marks MC, Bastrom T, Harms Study Group (2010) Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine 35:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c77f8c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carender CN, Morris WZ, Poe-Kochert C, Thompson GH, Son-Hing JP, Liu RW (2016) Low pelvic incidence is associated with proximal junctional kyphosis in patients treated with growing rods. Spine 41:792–797. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Rinella A, Edwards C 2nd (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine 30:1643–1649. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000169451.76359.49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy RF, Emans JB, Troy M, Miller PE, Hresko MT, Karlin LI, Hedequist DJ, Glotzbecker MP (2018) Sagittal plane parameters in growing rod patients following final fusion. J Pediatr Orthop B 27:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erdoğan S, Polat B, Atıcı Y, Özyalvaç ON, Öztürk C (2019) Comparison of the effects of magnetically controlled growing rod and tradiotinal growing rod techniques on the sagittal plane in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 62:577–585. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0094

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Inaparthy P, Queruz JC, Bhagawati D, Thakar C, Subramanian T, Nnadi C (2016) Incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis with magnetic expansion control rods in early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25:3308–3315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4693-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lowe TG (2004) Kyphosis of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine in the pediatric patient: surgical treatment. Instr Course Lect 53:493–500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah SA, Karatas AF, Dhawale AA, Dede O, Mundis GM Jr, Holmes L Jr, Yorgova P, Neiss G, Johnston CE, Emans JB, Thompson GH, Pawelek JB, Akbarnia BA, Growing Spine Study Group (2014) The effect of serial growing rod lengthening on the sagittal profile and pelvic parameters in early-onset scoliosis. Spine 39:E1311–E1317. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flynn JM, Tomlinson LA, Pawelek J, Thompson GH, McCarthy R, Akbarnia BA, Growing Spine Study Group (2013) Growing-rod graduates: lessons learned from ninety-nine patients who completed lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1745–1750. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang YB, Zhang JG (2020) Treatment of early-onset scoliosis: techniques, indications, and complications. Chin Med J (Engl) 133:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds were received in support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MC made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, acquisition of data, analysis of data, interpretation of data; drafting the work, revising critically for important intellectual content; final approval of version to be published.

PY made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data; drafting the work; final approval of version to be published.

GN made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data; final approval of version to be published.

JBP made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data; drafting the work; final approval of version to be published.

GHT made substantial contributions to the drafting the work; final approval of version to be published.

DLS made substantial contributions to the drafting the work; final approval of version to be published.

VVJ made substantial contributions to the drafting the work; final approval of version to be published.

BAA made substantial contributions to the final approval of version to be published.

SAS made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, interpretation of data; drafting the work, revising critically for important intellectual content; final approval of version to be published.

The Growing Spine Study Group made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data; drafting the work; final approval of version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suken A. Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they no conflict of interest.

Dr. Akbarnia reports grants and personal fees from Nuvasive, personal fees from K2M, personal fees from DePuy Synthes, personal fees from NociMed, personal fees from Viseon, grants from SeaSpine, outside the submitted work.

Suken Shah has received consulting fees from NuVasive, Inc. and DePuy Synthes Spine, outside the scope of this work.

Dr. Thompson reports personal fees and other from OrthoPediatrics, personal fees from Wolter Kluwer, other from Shriner's Hospital for Children, other from Nuvasive, other from Scoliosis Research Society, outside the submitted work.

The Growing Spine Study Group reports grants from the Growing Spine Foundation, Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America, Food and Drug Administration, and Nuvasive, outside of the submitted work.

The remaining authors (Mutlu Cobanoglu, Petya Yorgova, Geraldine Neiss, Jeff B. Pawelek, David L. Skaggs, and Viral V. Jain) declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Ethical approval

This study was performed using the Growing Spine Database Registry. Our institution is an active participant in the registry with an approved prospective study, approved by our institutional review board, and all sites in the registry have similar approval.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cobanoglu, M., Yorgova, P., Neiss, G. et al. Prevalence of junctional kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis: can it be corrected at final fusion?. Eur Spine J 30, 3563–3569 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06968-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06968-0

Keywords

Navigation