Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive model of global tilt (GT) determined by individual thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence in the human degenerative spine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Previous studies only investigated the simple linear relationships of global tilt (GT) with thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic incidence (PI). This study aimed to establish multiple linear regressions of GT based on individual TK, LL and PI in patients with degenerative spines.

Methods

Four hundred sixty-nine adult patients aged older than 35 years with various degenerative spinal diseases were enrolled in this two-centre study between January 2017 and December 2020. Full-spine X-rays were performed for all the subjects in a standing position. The following regional and global parameters were measured in the sagittal plane: TK, LL, PI, pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and GT. The correlations of the GT, PT and SVA with the TK, LL and PI were analysed, and then multiple linear regressions were constructed.

Results

GT was statistically correlated with TK, LL and PI. Additionally, TK, LL and PI were significant predictors for the GT, PT and SVA models. The relevant predictive formulae were as follows: GT = -9.60 + 1.09*PI + 0.89*LL + 0.42*TK (R2 = 0.935), PT = -4.49 + 0.81*PI + 0.56*LL + 0.24*TK (R2 = 0.792) and SVA = -25.68 + 2.98*LL + 2.37*PI + 1.67*TK (R2 = 0.416).

Conclusion

The specific sagittal spinopelvic morphology, evaluated by GT parameters, should be determined by individual TK, LL and PI values in the degenerative spine. Surgeons can utilize such predictive models to better understand the degenerative evolution of sagittal alignment and recognize the relationships between regional parameters and global sagittal alignment to customize a precise correction strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sebaaly A, Grobost P, Mallam L et al (2018) Description of the sagittal alignment of the degenerative human spine. Eur Spine J 27(2):489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou S, Xu F, Wang W et al (2020) Age-based normal sagittal alignment in Chinese asymptomatic adults: establishment of the relationships between pelvic incidence and other parameters. Eur Spine J 29(3):396–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S et al (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine 38(13):E803-812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banno T, Togawa D, Arima H et al (2016) The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers. Eur Spine J 25(11):3687–3693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L et al (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Obeid I, Boissière L, Yilgor C et al (2016) Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning. Eur Spine J 25(11):3644–3649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan C, Wang G, Sun J (2020) Correlation between the apex of lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence in asymptomatic adult. Eur Spine J 29(3):420–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan C, Wang G, Sun J et al (2020) Correlations between the inflection point and spinal sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adults. Eur Spine J 29(9):2272–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pan C, Wang G, Wang X et al (2021) Predictive formulae of ideal lumbar lordosis determined by individual pelvic incidence and thoracic kyphosis in asymptomatic adults. J Orthop Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E et al (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30(3):346–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laouissat F, Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M et al (2018) Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification. Eur Spine J 27(8):2002–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L et al (2017) Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(19):1661–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayashi K, Boissière L, Guevara-Villazón F (2019) Factors influencing patient satisfaction after adult scoliosis and spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 31(3):408–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pizones J, Moreno-Manzanaro L, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ et al (2020) Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile in adult scoliosis surgery decreases the risk of mechanical complications. Eur Spine J 29(1):54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohba T, Ebata S, Oba H et al (2019) Predictors of poor global alignment and proportion score after surgery for adult spinal deformity. Spine 44(19):E1136–E1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Polly DW Jr, Rosner MK, Monacci W, Moquin RR (2003) Thoracic hemivertebra excision in adults via a posterior-only approach. Report of two cases. Neurosurg Focus 14(2):e9. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2003.14.2.10

  18. Takemitsu Y, Harada Y, Iwahara T et al (1988) Lumbar degenerative kyphosis. Clin. Radiol. Epidemiol. Stud Spine 13(11):1317–1326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, et al (2013) Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 22 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S834–841.

  20. Le Huec JC, Hasegawa K (2016) Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects. Eur Spine J 25(11):3630–3637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mancino F, Cacciola G, Di Matteo V et al (2020) Surgical implications of the hip-spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 12(Suppl 1):8656

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin TC, Wegner AM, Lu ML et al (2021) Do orthopedic surgeons or neurosurgeons detect more hip disorders in patients with hip-spine syndrome? Nationwide Database Study Brain Sci 11(4):485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elbuluk AM, Wright-Chisem JI, Vigdorchik JM et al (2021) Applying the hip-spine relationship: what x-rays and measurements are important? J Arthroplasty S0883–5403(21):00218–00227

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hey HWD, Tan KA, Chin BZ et al (2019) Comparison of whole body sagittal alignment during directed versus natural, relaxed standing postures in young, healthy adults. Spine J 19(11):1832–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A et al (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine 34(17):1828–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakashima H, Kawakami N, Ohara T et al (2021) A new global spinal balance classification based on individual pelvic anatomical measurements in patients with adult spinal deformity. Spine 46(4):223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lafage R, Line BG, Gupta S et al (2017) Orientation of the upper-most instrumented segment influences proximal junctional disease following adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine 42(20):1570–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimizu T, Lehman RA Jr, Sielatycki JA et al (2020) Reciprocal change of sagittal profile in unfused spinal segments and lower extremities after complex adult spinal deformity surgery including spinopelvic fixation: a full-body X-ray analysis. Spine J 20(3):380–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Imaging in Shandong provincial hospital and The second Xiangya hospital, for providing the image data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CP and GW: conceived the study design. YL and LK: supervised the data collection and analysis. CP: drafted the manuscript. JS and GL: contributed to the revision. CP and GL: are responsible for this article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guohua Lv.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, C., Wang, G., Li, Y. et al. Predictive model of global tilt (GT) determined by individual thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence in the human degenerative spine. Eur Spine J 30, 3191–3199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06947-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06947-5

Keywords

Navigation