Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in painful foot drop: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Foot drop is a relatively uncommon presentation of lumbar degenerative disease and there is currently a paucity of evidence on management and outcomes which is reflective of the lack of standardised treatment provided to patients. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the effectiveness of surgical management and the factors that predict surgical outcome.

Methods

A systematic database search of Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Pubmed, Embase and Google Scholar was undertaken from inception through August 2018. Only studies reporting on surgical outcome in adult patients who had a painful foot drop and underwent decompression were included. Case reports and studies with surgical fixation were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

797 studies were screened and 9 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. This resulted in a total of 431 patients who underwent decompression for foot drop. Pooled rates of outcome for improvement in foot drop MRC grade were 84.5% (range 67.9–96%). Sub-group meta-analyses of studies revealed a statistically significant association between duration of foot drop (pooled 4.95 [95% CI 1.13–21.74]), severity of preoperative weakness (pooled 0.38 [95% CI 0.15–0.93]) on post-operative outcome and age (pooled 6.28 [1.33–29.72]).

Conclusion

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the outcome and prognostic indicators of lumbar decompression for foot drop. Findings indicate that age, duration of foot drop weakness and MRC grade of foot drop prior to intervention were strong predictors of surgical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. Aono H, Iwasaki M, Ohwada T et al (2007) Surgical outcome of drop foot caused by degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine 32:262–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson H, Carlsson CA (1966) Prognosis of operatively treated lumbar disc herniations causing extensor paralysis. Acta Chir Scand 132:501–506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baysefer A, Erdogan E, Sail A et al (1998) Foot drop following brain tumors: case reports. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 41:97–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katirji MB, Wilbourn AJ (1988) Common peroneal mononeuropathy: a clinical and electrophysiologic study of 116 lesions. Neurology 38:1723–1728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Masakado Y, Kawakami M, Suzuki K et al (2008) Clinical neurophysiology in the diagnosis of peroneal nerve palsy. Keio J Med 57:84–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart JD (2008) Foot drop: where, why and what to do? Prac Neurol 8:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garrido E, Rosenwasser R (1981) Painless foot drop secondary to lumbar disc herniation: report of two cases. Neurosurgery 8:484–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Huang RC et al (2002) Improvement of preoperative foot drop after lumbar surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Voermans NC, Koetsveld AC, Zwarts MJ (2006) Segmental overlap: foot drop in S1 radiculopathy. Acta Neurochir 148:809–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iizuka Y, Iizuka H, Tsutsumi S et al (2009) Foot drop due to lumbar degenerative conditions: mechanism and prognostic factors in herniated nucleus pulposus and lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 10:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu K, Zhu W, Shi J et al (2013) Foot drop caused by lumbar degenerative disease: clinical features, prognostic factors of surgical outcome and clinical stage. PLoS ONE 8(11):e80375. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. McCulloch JA, Waddell G (1980) Variation of the lumbosacral myotomes with bony segmental anomalies. J Bone Jt Surg Br 62-B:475–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Macki M, Syeda S, Kerezoudis P et al (2016) Preoperative motor strength and time to surgery are the most important predictors of improvement in foot drop due to degenerative lumbar disease. J Neurol Sci 361:133–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakhsh A (2010) Long-term outcome of lumbar disc surgery: an experience from Pakistan. J Neurosurg Spine 12:666–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarulli AW, Raynor EM (2007) Lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol Clin 23:387–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearson A, Lurie J, Tosteson T et al (2012) Who should have surgery for an intervertebral disc herniation? Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 37:140–149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hakelius A (1970) Prognosis in sciatica. Acfa Orfhop Scand 129:1–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Saal JA (1996) Natural history and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Spine 21:2S-9S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber H (1970) An evaluation of conservative and surgical treatment of lumbar disc protrusion. J Oslo Citu Hosp 20:81–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dubourg G, Rozenberg S, Fautrel B et al (2002) A pilot study on the recovery from paresis after lumbar disc herniation. Spine 27:1426–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Postacchini F, Giannicola G, Cinotti G (2002) Recovery of motor deficits after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:1040–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Galal A (2013) Determinants of recovery of pre-operative acute and chronic foot drop after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Egypt J Neurol Psychiat Neurosurg 50(3):257–264

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ghahreman A, Ferch RD, Rao P et al (2009) Recovery of ankle dorsiflexion weakness following lumbar decompressive surgery. J Clin Neurosci 16:1024–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhargava D, Sinha P, Odak S et al (2012) Surgical outcome for foot drop in lumbar degenerative disease. Glob Spine J 2:125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma J, He Y, Wang A et al (2017) Risk factors analysis for foot drop associated with lumbar disc herniation: an analysis of 236 patients. World Neurosurg 110:e1017–e1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guigui P, Benost M, Delecourt C et al (1998) Motor deficit in lumbar stenosis: a retrospective study of a series of 50 patients. J Spinal Disord 11:283–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lonne G, Solberg TK, Sjaavik K et al (2012) Recovery of muscle strength after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 21(4):655–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eysel P, Rompe JD, Hopf C (1994) Prognostic criteria of discogenic paresis. Eur Spine J 3(4):214–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Suzuki A, Matsumura A, Konishi S et al (2011) Risk factor analysis for motor deficit and delayed recovery associated with L4/5 lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Krishnan V, Rajasekaran S, Aiyer SN et al (2017) Clinical and radiological factors related to the presence of motor deficit in lumbar disc prolapse: a prospective analysis of 70 consecutive cases with neurological deficit. Eur Spine J 26:2642–2649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weber H (1975) The effect of delayed disc surgery on muscular paresis. Acta Orthop Scand 46:631–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Albayrak S, Ucler N, Ayden O et al (2016) Prognoses of 42 patients with foot drop caused by lumbar intervertebral disc pathologies. J Spine Neurosurg 5:2

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Nataraj A (2014) Foot drop resulting from degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: clinical characteristics and prognosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 117:33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Takenaka S, Aono H (2017) Prediction of postoperative clinical recovery of drop foot attributable to lumbar degenerative diseases, via a bayesian network. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:872–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aono H, Nagamoto Y, Tobimatsu H, Takenaka S, Iwasaki M (2014) Surgical outcomes for painless drop foot due to degenerative lumbar disorders. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:E258–E261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Naylor A (1974) The late results of laminectomy for lumbar disc prolapse: a review after ten to twenty-five years. J Bone Jt Surg Br 56:17–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Medical Research Council of the UK (1976) Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. Memorandum No. 45. Pendragon House, London, pp 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  40. Huedo-Medina T, Sanchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F et al. (2018) Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? CHIP documents. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/chip_docs/19. Accessed 10 September 2018

  41. Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR et al (2012) Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke 43:1711–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jackson R, Ameratunga S, Broad J et al (2006) The GATE frame: critical appraisal with pictures. Evid Based Med 11:35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D et al (2012) The newcastle-ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed Sept 2018

  44. Luchini C, Stubbs B, Solmi M et al (2017) Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: advantages and limitations of the newcastle ottawa scale. World J Meta Anal 5(4):80–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Davis RA (1994) A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 80:415–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA et al (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jonsson B, Stromqvist B (1995) Motor affliction of the L5 nerve root in lumbar nerve root compression syndromes. Spine 20:2012–2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. O’Connell JEA (1951) Protrusion of the lumbar intervertebral disc. J Bone Jt Surg Br 33:3–30

    Google Scholar 

  49. Petr O, Glodny B, Brawanski K et al (2017) Immediate versus delayed surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation for acute motor deficits: the impact of surgical timing on functional outcome. Spine 44(7):454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Matsui H, Kitagawa H, Kawaguchi Y et al (1995) Physiologic changes of nerve root during posterior lumbar discectomy. Spine 20:654–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Fidelman Z et al (2004) Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients. Eur Spine J 13(1):32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants or other support were received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fozia Saeed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 38 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saeed, F., Mukherjee, S., Chaudhuri, K. et al. Prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in painful foot drop: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 30, 3278–3288 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06936-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06936-8

Keywords

Navigation