Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying risks factors in thoracolumbar anterior fusion surgery through predictive analytics in a nationally representative inpatient sample

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Anterior thoracolumbar (TL) surgical approaches provide more direct trajectories compared to posterior approaches. Proper patient selection is key in identifying populations that may benefit from anterior TL fusion. Here, we utilize predictive analytics to identify risk factors in anterior TL fusion in patients with trauma and deformity.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study of patients receiving anterior TL fusion (between and including T12/L1), population-based regression models were developed to identify risk factors using the National Readmission Database 2016–2017. Readmissions were analyzed at 30- and 90-day intervals. Risk factors included hypertension, obesity, malnutrition, smoking, alcohol use, long-term opioid use, and frailty. Multivariate regression models were developed to determine the influence of each risk factor on complication rates.

Results

A total of 265 and 375 patients were identified for the scoliosis and burst fracture cohorts, respectively. In patients with scoliosis, alcohol use was found to increase the length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.00061) and all-payer inpatient cost following surgery (p = 0.014), and frailty was found to increase the inpatient LOS (p = 0.0045). In patients with burst fractures, malnutrition was found to increase the LOS (p < 0.0001) and all-payer cost (p < 0.0001), obesity was found to increase the all-payer cost (p = 0.012), and frailty was found to increase the all-payer cost (p = 0.031) and LOS (p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Patient-specific risk factors in anterior TL fusion surgery significantly influence complication rates. An understanding of relevant risk factors before surgery may facilitate preoperative patient selection and postoperative patient triage and risk categorization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No patient identifiers were collected, as we used a publicly available nationally representative database purchased through the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project website. No unique code was developed, and standard statistical software (RStudio) and tests were used.

References

  1. Gertzbein SD (1992) Scoliosis research society. Multicent Spine Fracture Study Spine 17:528–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Resnick DK, Weller SJ, Benzel EC (1997) Biomechanics of the thoracolumbar spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am 8:455–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Butt MF, Farooq M, Mir B et al (2008) Management of unstable thoracolumbar spinal injuries by posterior short segment spinal fixation: reply to comments by Singh. Int Orthop 32:281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS (2001) Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine 26:1038–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hitchon PW, Torner JC, Haddad SF, Follett KA (1998) Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol 49:619–26 (Discussion 626–7)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yi L, Jingping B, Gele J, et al (2006) Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (4):CD005079. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD005079.

  7. Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A et al (2003) Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:773–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khattak MJ, Syed S, Lakdawala RH (2010) Operative management of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 20:347–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bailey CS, Urquhart JC, Dvorak MF et al (2014) Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trial. Spine J 14:2557–2564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Puno RM, An K-C, Puno RL et al (2003) Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis: an assessment of the Lenke classification. Spine 28:2102–14 (Discussion 2114–5)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Toyama Y (2014) Updates on surgical treatments for pediatric scoliosis. J Orthop Sci 19:6–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lenke LG, Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH (2003) The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine. Spine 28:S199-207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs RR, Nordwall A, Nachemson A (1982) Reduction, stability, and strength provided by internal fixation systems for thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 171:300–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer PR, Cotler HB (1990) Fusion techniques for traumatic injuries. In: Cotler JM, Cotler HB (eds) Spinal fusion: science and technique. Springer, New York, NY, pp 189–246

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller U, Berlemann U, Sledge J, Schwarzenbach O (1999) Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit by indirect reduction and posterior instrumentation: bisegmental stabilization with monosegmental fusion. Eur Spine J 8:284–289

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Willén J, Lindahl S, Irstam L, Nordwall A (1984) Unstable thoracolumbar fractures. A study by CT and conventional roentgenology of the reduction effect of Harrington instrumentation. Spine 9:214–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaneda K, Fujiya N, Satoh S (1986) Results with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu LC, Zucherman J, Tang SC, Leong JC (1982) Dwyer instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:536–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanders AE, Baumann R, Brown H et al (2003) Selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in adolescents: when can the associated thoracic curve be left unfused? Spine 28:706–13 (Discussion 714)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiner JP, Abrams C (2009) The Johns hopkins adjusted clinical groups technical reference guide, version 9.0. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sternberg SA, Bentur N, Abrams C et al (2012) Identifying frail older people using predictive modeling. Am J Manag Care 18:e392–e397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abrams C, Lieberman R, Weiner J (2003) Development and evaluation of the Johns Hopkins University risk adjustment models for Medicare+ choice plan payment. https://www.hopkinsacg.org/document/development-and-evaluation-of-the-johns-hopkins-university-risk-adjustmentmodels-for-medicarechoice-plan-payment/

  23. Ciorniciuc V Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Calculator. https://www.thecalculator.co. https://www.thecalculator.co/health/Charlson-Comorbidity-Index-(CCI)-Calculator-765.html. Accessed 17 Apr 2020

  24. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM et al (2011) Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 173:676–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Radovanovic D, Seifert B, Urban P et al (2014) Validity of Charlson comorbidity index in patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus registry 2002–2012. Heart 100:288–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jang H-D, Bang C, Lee JC et al (2018) Risk factor analysis for predicting vertebral body re-collapse after posterior instrumented fusion in thoracolumbar burst fracture. Spine J 18:285–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Deng H, Chan A, Ammanuel S et al (2019) Risk factors for deep surgical site infection following thoracolumbar spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 32:292–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fujiwara Y, Manabe H, Izumi B et al (2017) The impact of hypertension on the occurrence of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma following single level microscopic posterior lumbar decompression surgery in a single institute. Eur Spine J 26:2606–2615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang T, Yang S-D, Huang W-Z et al (2016) Factors predicting venous thromboembolism after spine surgery. Medicine 95:e5776

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nwachuku EL, Mehta A, Alan N et al (2018) Risk factors and clinical impact of perioperative neurological deficits following thoracolumbar arthrodesis. Interdiscip Neurosurg 14:18–23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yao R, Zhou H, Choma TJ et al (2018) Surgical site infection in spine surgery: Who is at risk? Glob Spine J 8:5S-30S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oe S, Yamato Y, Hasegawa T et al (2020) Association between a prognostic nutritional index less than 50 and the risk of medical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 27:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.1.SPINE191410

  35. Khanna K, Yi PH, Sing DC et al (2018) Hypoalbuminemia is associated with septic revisions after primary surgery and postoperative infection after revision surgery. Spine 43:454–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mattle H, Sieb JP, Rohner M, Mumenthaler M (1987) Nontraumatic spinal epidural and subdural hematomas. Neurology 37:1351–1356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dobran M, Marini A, Nasi D et al (2017) Risk factors of surgical site infections in instrumented spine surgery. Surg Neurol Int 8:212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Passias PG, Bortz C, Alas H et al (2019) Alcoholism as a predictor for pseudarthrosis in primary spine fusion: an analysis of risk factors and 30-day outcomes for 52,402 patients from 2005 to 2013. J Orthop 16:36–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dimmitt SB, Rakic V, Puddey IB et al (1998) The effects of alcohol on coagulation and fibrinolytic factors: a controlled trial. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 9:39–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Longo UG, Denaro L, Spiezia F et al (2011) Symptomatic disc herniation and serum lipid levels. Eur Spine J 20:1658–1662

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tintut Y, Morony S, Demer LL (2004) Hyperlipidemia promotes osteoclastic potential of bone marrow cells ex vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24:e6–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Epstein NE (2017) More risks and complications for elective spine surgery in morbidly obese patients. Surg Neurol Int 8:66

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Patel N, Bagan B, Vadera S et al (2007) Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg Spine 6:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jackson KL 2nd, Devine JG (2016) The effects of obesity on spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Glob Spine J 6:394–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Flexman AM, Street J, Charest-Morin R (2019) The impact of frailty and sarcopenia on patient outcomes after complex spine surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 32:609–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Flexman AM, Charest-Morin R, Stobart L et al (2016) Frailty and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative spine disease. Spine J 16:1315–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moskven E, Bourassa-Moreau É, Charest-Morin R et al (2018) The impact of frailty and sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes in adult spine surgery. A systematic review of the literature. Spine J 18:2354–2369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Banaszek D, Inglis T, Marion TE et al (2020) Effect of frailty on outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 37:839–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yagi M, Fujita N, Okada E et al (2018) Impact of frailty and comorbidities on surgical outcomes and complications in adult spinal disorders. Spine 43:1259–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Leven DM, Lee NJ, Kothari P et al (2016) Frailty index is a significant predictor of complications and mortality after surgery for adult spinal deformity. Spine 41:E1394–E1401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No sources of funding were used for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shane Shahrestani or Zorica Buser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Disclosures outside of submitted work: ZB-consultancy: Cerapedics, The Scripps Research Institute, Xenco Medical (past), AO Spine (past); Research Support: SeaSpine (past, paid to the institution), Next Science (paid directly to institution), Motion Metrics (paid directly to institution); North American Spine Society: committee member; Lumbar Spine Society: Co-chair Research committee, AOSpine Knowledge Forum Degenerative: Associate member; AOSNA Research committee—committee member; JCW Royalties—Biomet, Seaspine, Amedica, DePuy Synthes; Investments/Options—Bone Biologics, Pearldiver, Electrocore, Surgitech; Board of Directors—North American Spine Society, AO Foundation (20,000 honorariums for board position, plus travel for board meetings), Cervical Spine Research Society; Editorial Boards—Spine, The Spine Journal, Clinical Spine Surgery, Global Spine Journal; Fellowship Funding (paid directly to institution): AO Foundation.

Disclsoures

JCW- Royalties – Biomet, Seaspine, Amedica, Synthes; Investments/Options – Bone Biologics, Pearldiver, Electrocore, Surgitech; Board of Directors - AO Foundation, Society for Brain Mapping and Therapeutics, Fellowship Funding (paid to institution): AO Foundation ZB- consultancy: Cerapedics (past), The Scripps Research Institute (past), Xenco Medical (past), AO Spine (past); Research Support: SeaSpine (past, paid to the institution), Next Science (paid directly to institution), Motion Metrics (paid directly to institution); North American Spine Society: committee member; Lumbar Spine Society: Co-chair Educational Committee, AOSpine Knowledge Forum Degenerative: Associate member; AOSNA Research committee member.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahrestani, S., Ballatori, A.M., Chen, X.T. et al. Identifying risks factors in thoracolumbar anterior fusion surgery through predictive analytics in a nationally representative inpatient sample. Eur Spine J 31, 669–677 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06857-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06857-6

Keywords

Navigation