Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metallosis is commonly associated with magnetically controlled growing rods; results from an independent multicentre explant database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Determine the incidence of metallosis around MAGEC rods.

Methods

A multicentre explant database was searched to identify cases with complete intraoperative findings at rod removal. Surgeons removing rods detailed the presence or absence of tissue metallosis associated with rods. More recently surgeons measured the ‘length’ of tissue metallosis. Prior to rod disassembly, the majority underwent testing with an external remote controller (ERC). The impact of clinical and explant variables on metallosis was assessed.

Results

Sixty-six cases were identified. Mean age at insertion was 8.1 ± 2.3 years with mean duration of implantation 37.6 ± 15.1 months.

Tissue metallosis was noted at revision surgery in 52/66 cases (79%). Metallosis was noted more commonly when rods were removed during fusion surgery than rod removal/exchange (97% vs. 58% (p =  < 0.01)). The mass at insertion was greater in cases with metallosis (25.9 ± 7.8 kg vs. 21.1 ± 6.2 kg, p = 0.04).

Length of tissue metallosis was reported for 45 rods, median 9 cm (range 1–25). Metallosis was noted in 43/59 (73%) rods that produced no force and 22/30 (73%) rods that produced some force on ERC activation (p = 0.96). Wear debris was found within the actuator in all rods, and all but 3 rods had damaged O-rings.

Conclusion

MAGEC rods are associated with tissue metallosis in the majority of cases. It is seen with functional rods as well as failed rods and appears related to wear debris within the actuator and high rates of O-ring failure. Until the implications of metal debris in children are known, we urge caution with the use of this implant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheung KM-C, Cheung JP-Y, Samartzis D et al (2012) Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series. Lancet 379:1967–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nnadi C, Thakar C, Wilson-MacDonald J et al (2018) An NIHR-approved two-year observational study on magnetically controlled growth rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Bone Jt J 100-B:507–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. NuVasive Urgent Field Safety Notice / MAGEC System. 2019.

  4. MHRA MDA/2020/010 Spinal implant: MAGEC System Model X rods—risk of failure in use. 2020.

  5. MHRA MDA/2020/011 Spinal implant: All MAGEC Systems—supply suspended to the UK. 2020.

  6. Jones CS, Stokes OM, Patel SB et al (2016) Actuator pin fracture in magnetically controlled growing rods: two cases. Spine J 16:e287–e291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Teoh KH, von Ruhland C, Evans SL et al (2016) Metallosis following implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of scoliosis: a case series. Bone Jt J 98-B:1662–1667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Willis-Owen CA, Keene GC, Oakeshott RD (2011) Early metallosis-related failure after total knee replacement: a report of 15 cases. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93-B:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Studer D, Heidt C, Büchler P et al (2019) Treatment of early onset spinal deformities with magnetically controlled growing rods: a single centre experience of 30 cases. J Child Orthop 13:196–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheung JPY, Cheung KM (2019) Current status of the magnetically controlled growing rod in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: what we know after a decade of experience. J Orthop Surg 27:2309499019886945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hosseini P, Pawelek J, Mundis GM et al (2016) Magnetically controlled growing rods for early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study of 23 cases with minimum 2 years follow-up. Spine 41:1456–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lampe LP, Schulze Bövingloh A, Gosheger G et al (2019) Magnetically controlled growing rods in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a single center study with a minimum of 2-year-follow up and preliminary results after converting surgery. Spine 44:1201–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Subramanian T, Ahmad A, Mardare DM et al (2018) A six-year observational study of 31 children with early-onset scoliosis treated using magnetically controlled growing rods with a minimum follow-up of two years. Bone Jt J 100-B:1187–1200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Joyce TJ, Smith SL, Rushton PRP et al (2018) Analysis of explanted magnetically controlled growing rods from seven UK Spinal Centers. Spine 43:E16–E22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rushton PRP, Smith SL, Forbes L et al (2019) Force testing of explanted magnetically controlled growing rods. Spine 44:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang TZ, Sze KY, Peng Z et al (2020) Systematic investigation of metallosis associated with magnetically controlled growing rod implantation for early-onset scoliosis. Bone Jt J 102-B:1375–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheung JPY, Yiu K, Kwan K et al (2018) Mean 6-year follow-up of magnetically controlled growing rod patients with early onset scoliosis: a glimpse of what happens to graduates. Neurosurgery 84:1112–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Beets MW et al (2011) How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8:78–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hallab NJ, Cunningham BW, Jacobs JJ (2003) Spinal implant debris-induced osteolysis. Spine 28:S125–S138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Daley B, Doherty AT, Fairman B et al (2004) Wear debris from hip or knee replacements causes chromosomal damage in human cells in tissue culture. J Bone Jt Surg, Br Vol 86-B:598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Igbokwe IO, Igwenagu E, Igbokwe NA (2019) Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects. Interdiscip Toxicol 12:45–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fatola OI, Olaolorun FA, Olopade FE et al (2019) Trends in vanadium neurotoxicity. Brain Res Bull 145:75–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yilgor C, Efendiyev A, Akbiyik F et al (2018) Metal Ion release during growth-friendly instrumentation for early-onset scoliosis: a preliminary study. Spine Deform 6:48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang C-C, Tang C-L, Tzeng C-Y et al (2018) Metallosis after traumatic loosening of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review. Eur Spine J 27:415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldenberg Y, Tee JW, Salinas-La Rosa CM et al (2016) Spinal metallosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 25:1467–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS et al (1999) Metal debris from titanium spinal implants. Spine 24:899–903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh V, Simpson J, Rawlinson J et al (2013) Growth guidance system for early-onset scoliosis: comparison of experimental and retrieval wear. Spine 38:1546–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lukina E, Kollerov M, Meswania J et al (2015) Analysis of retrieved growth guidance sliding LSZ-4D Devices for early onset scoliosis and investigation of the use of nitinol rods for this system. Spine 40:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy RE, McCullough FL (2015) Shilla growth guidance for early-onset scoliosis: results after a minimum of five years of follow-up. JBJS 97:1578–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hill G, Nagaraja S, Akbarnia BA et al (2017) Retrieval and clinical analysis of distraction-based dual growing rod constructs for early-onset scoliosis. Spine J 17:1506–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Akazawa T, Minami S, Takahashi K et al (2005) Corrosion of spinal implants retrieved from patients with scoliosis. J Orthop Sci 10:200–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bellinger DC, Calderon J (2019) Neurotoxicity of general anesthetics in children: evidence and uncertainties. Curr Opin Pediatr 31:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the surgeons contributing cases to this study from Bristol, Belfast, Edinburgh, Exeter, Leeds, Oxford and Sheffield in the UK, Aarhus in Denmark, Basel in Switzerland and Vancouver in Canada. We thank the manufacturers of the implant, NuVasive Specialised Orthopaedics, San Diego, CA, who kindly provided a testing jig but did not influence the conduct of this independent study.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Great North Children’s Hospital, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Paul R. P. Rushton, David Fender & Andrew J. Bowey

  2. School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Simon L. Smith & Thomas J. Joyce

  3. Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Michael J. Gibson

Authors
  1. Paul R. P. Rushton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon L. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Fender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew J. Bowey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael J. Gibson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas J. Joyce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Gibson MJ and Joyce TJ helped in conceptualization; Rushton PR, Joyce TJ, Smith S contributed to methodology; Rushton PR, Joyce TJ, Smith SL formally analyzed and investigated the study; Rushton PR, Joyce TJ helped in writing—original draft preparation; Gibson MJ, Fender D, Bowey AJ helped in writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. P. Rushton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This is an observational study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Michael J. Gibson: Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon (Retired).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rushton, P.R.P., Smith, S.L., Fender, D. et al. Metallosis is commonly associated with magnetically controlled growing rods; results from an independent multicentre explant database. Eur Spine J 30, 1905–1911 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06750-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06750-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation