Skip to main content


Log in

10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for chronic upper limb and neck pain: Australian experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript



Intractable upper limb and neck pain has traditionally been a challenging pain condition to treat, with conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) often inducing positional variation in paraesthesia and/or inadequate coverage of axial neck pain. The purpose of this Australian multi-centre prospective, clinical trial was to assess the safety and effectiveness of paraesthesia-independent 10 kHz SCS for the treatment of upper limb and neck pain.


Subjects with chronic, intractable neck and/or upper limb pain of ≥ 5 cm (on a 0–10-cm visual analogue scale) were enrolled (ACTRN12614000153617) following human research ethics committee approval. Subjects were implanted with two epidural leads spanning C2–C6 vertebral bodies. Subjects with successful trial stimulation were implanted with a Senza® system (Nevro Corp., Redwood City, CA, USA) and included in the safety and effectiveness evaluation at 3 months post-implant (primary endpoint assessment, PEA) and followed to 12 months.


Overall, 31/38 (82.6%) subjects reported a successful 10 kHz SCS trial and proceeded to a permanent implant. Twenty-three of 30 subjects (76.7%) met the PEA. Subjects reported a reduction in neck pain and upper limb pain from baseline at the PEA (8.1 ± 0.2 cm vs. 2.9 ± 0.5 cm, 7.3 ± 0.3 cm vs. 2.5 ± 0.5 cm, respectively, p ≤ 0.0001). Disability, as measured by pain disability index score, decreased from 42.6 ± 2.6 at baseline to 22.7 ± 3.2 at PEA. Results were maintained 12 months post-implant. No neurological deficits, nor reports of paraesthesia, were observed.


Stable, long-term results demonstrated that 10 kHz SCS is a promising therapy option for intractable chronic upper limb and neck pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Cohen SP (2015) Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc 90(2):284–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vallejo R, Kramer J, Benyamin R (2007) Neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord in the treatment of chronic intractable neck and upper extremity pain: a case series and review of the literature. Pain Phys 10(2):305–311

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke MJ, Schiefer TK, Pichelmann MA, Krauss WE (2011) Axial neck pain: a surgeon’s perspective. Therapy 8(6):763–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Provenzano DA, Amirdelfan K, Kapural L, Sitzman BT (2017) Evidence gaps in the use of spinal cord stimulation for treating chronic spine conditions. Spine 42(Suppl 14):S80–S92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, Levy RM, Abejon D, Buchser E, Burton A, Buvanendran A, Candido K, Caraway D, Cousins M, DeJongste M, Diwan S, Eldabe S, Gatzinsky K, Foreman RD, Hayek S, Kim P, Kinfe T, Kloth D, Kumar K, Rizvi S, Lad SP, Liem L, Linderoth B, Mackey S, McDowell G, McRoberts P, Poree L, Prager J, Raso L, Rauck R, Russo M, Simpson B, Slavin K, Staats P, Stanton-Hicks M, Verrills P, Wellington J, Williams K, North R, Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus C (2014) The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation 17(6):515–550. 550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haider N, Ligham D, Quave B, Harum KE, Garcia EA, Gilmore CA, Miller N, Moore GA, Bains A, Lechleiter K, Jain R (2018) Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial outcomes after conversion to a multiple waveform SCS system. Neuromodulation 21(5):504–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter CW, Carlson J, Yang A, Deer T (2018) Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of failed neck surgery syndrome: outcome of a prospective case series. Neuromodulation 21(5):495–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salmon J (2019) High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for widespread pain: a retrospective survey of outcomes from combined cervical and thoracic electrode placements. Postgrad Med 131(3):230–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amirdelfan K, Vallejo R, Benyamin R, Yu C, Yang T, Bundschu R, Yearwood TL, Sitzman BT, Gliner B, Subbaroyan J, Rotte A, Caraway D (2019) High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of combined neck and arm pain: results from a prospective multicenter study. Neurosurgery.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Simpson BA, Bassett G, Davies K, Herbert C, Pierri M (2003) Cervical spinal cord stimulation for pain: a report on 41 patients. Neuromodulation 6(1):20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jang HD, Kim MS, Chang CH, Kim SW, Kim OL, Kim SH (2008) Analysis of failed spinal cord stimulation trials in the treatment of intractable chronic pain. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 43(2):85–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Russo M, Van Buyten JP (2015) 10-kHz high-frequency SCS therapy: a clinical summary. Pain Med 16(5):934–942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith T, Harris S, Pang D (2015) The use of 10-kilohertz spinal cord stimulation in a cohort of patients with chronic neuropathic limb pain refractory to medical management. Neuromodulation 18(1):18–23. 23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, Amirdelfan K, Morgan DM, Brown LL, Yearwood TL, Bundschu R, Burton AW, Yang T, Benyamin R, Burgher AH (2015) Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 123(4):851–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amirdelfan K, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Morgan DM, Kapural L, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, Yearwood TL, Bundschu R, Yang T, Benyamin R, Burgher AH, Brooks ES, Powell AA, Subbaroyan J (2018) Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT. Qual Life Res 27(8):2035–2044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S (1990) The pain disability index: psychometric properties. Pain 40(2):171–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, Harding G, Coyne KS, Peirce-Sandner S, Bhagwat D, Everton D, Burke LB, Cowan P, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Max MB, Rappaport BA, Melzack R (2009) Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain 144(1–2):35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, Stradling J (1997) A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med 19(2):179–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H (1999) Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA 282(12):1157–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 28(2):193–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Amirdelfan K, Gliner BE, Kapural L, Sitzman BT, Vallejo R, Yu C, Caraway D, Rotte A, Province-Azalde R, Krames E (2019) A proposed definition of remission from chronic pain, based on retrospective evaluation of 24-month outcomes with spinal cord stimulation. Postgrad Med 131(4):278–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Soer R, Reneman MF, Vroomen PC, Stegeman P, Coppes MH (2012) Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change of the Pain Disability Index in patients with chronic back pain. Spine 37(8):711–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eldabe S, Buchser E, Duarte RV (2016) Complications of spinal cord stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation techniques: a review of the literature. Pain Med 17(2):325–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stauss T, El Majdoub F, Sayed D, Surges G, Rosenberg WS, Kapural L, Bundschu R, Lalkhen A, Patel N, Gliner B, Subbaroyan J, Rotte A, Edgar DR, Bettag M, Maarouf M (2019) A multicenter real-world review of 10 kHz SCS outcomes for treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 6(3):496–507.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adele Barnard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The study was sponsored by Nevro Corp. Drs Verrills, Russo and Salmon are consultants to Nevro Corp. Mr Gliner, Barnard and Caraway are employees of Nevro Corp.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verrills, P., Salmon, J., Russo, M. et al. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for chronic upper limb and neck pain: Australian experience. Eur Spine J 29, 2786–2794 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: