Skip to main content

Back disorder incidence and occupation in Denmark: a cross-sectional register-based study

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present paper is (1) to describe the occupational distribution of persons with incident back disorders and (2) to determine the incidence rate ratio (RR) for back pain amongst patients working in specific occupation groups.

Methods

Using Danish registries, a total of 20,921 employed persons with incidents back disorders aged 18–64 years were identified in 2016 based on the inclusion criteria from the Danish Back Register. RR was estimated to test for differences in incident back disorder diagnoses across occupations. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to test for homogeneity in back disorder incidence across occupations.

Results

The distribution of back disorder incidence for employed is above the distribution of employment in the background population for all age groups above 35 years. For employed women the three occupation groups with the highest RR of back pain incidence are: ‘water, sewage and waste’; ‘residential institutions and home care’; and ‘transport of passengers’, while similarly, amongst employed men: ‘hairdressers and other personal care’; ‘hospitals’; and ‘cleaning’. RR of incident back pain disorders is lowest for women employed in ‘universities and research’ and for men employed in ‘IT and telecommunications’.

Conclusions

This study is the first to investigate the occupational status and RR of back disorder incidence across occupation groups in Denmark. The distribution of back pain disorder incidents in the cross-sectional study is weighted to occupation groups involving hard physical activity. This evidence may be useful for considering work environment or pension reforms.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R (2012) A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 64(6):2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schneider S, Lipinski S, Schiltenwolf MJESJ (2006) Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany. Eur Spine J 15(6):821–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1015-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, Hoy D, Karppinen J, Pransky G, Sieper JJTL (2018) What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 391(10137):2356–2367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, Ferreira PH, Fritz JM, Koes BW, Peul W (2018) Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet 391(10137):2368–2383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sundstrup E, Andersen LL (2017) Hard physical work intensifies the occupational consequence of physician-diagnosed back disorder: prospective cohort study with register follow-up among 10,000 workers. Int J Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1037051

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bevan S (2015) Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 29(3):356–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J (2014) The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73(6):968–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunningham C, Flynn T, Blake C (2006) Low back pain and occupation among Irish health service workers. Occup Med (Lond) 56(7):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13(3):205–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Regionernes kliniske kvalitetsudviklingsprogram Dansk Rygdatabase. https://www.rkkp.dk/om-rkkp/de-kliniske-kvalitetsdatabaser/dansk-rygdatabase/. Accessed Mar 2019

  11. Xu Y, Bach E, Ørhede E (1996) Occupation and risk for the occurrence of low-back pain (LBP) in Danish employees. Occup Med 46(2):131–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Halonen JI, Shiri R, Mänty M, Sumanen H, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E, Kähönen M, Lehtimäki T, Raitakari OT, Lallukka T (2019) Exposure to heavy physical work from early to later adulthood and primary healthcare visits due to musculoskeletal diseases in midlife: a register linked study. BMJ Open 9(8):e031564

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lallukka T, Viikari-Juntura E, Viikari J, Kähönen M, Lehtimäki T, Raitakari O, Solovieva S (2017) Early work-related physical exposures and low back pain in midlife: the cardiovascular risk in Young Finns study. Occup Environ Med 74(3):163–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M (2011) The Danish national patient register. Scand J Public Health 39(7_suppl):30–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811401482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT (2014) The Danish civil registration system as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 29(8):541–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dansk Rygdatabase—National Klinisk Kvalitetsdatabase (2017) DaRD, Beskrivelse af indikatorer

  17. Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø (2017) Danskernes arbejdsmiljø 2016. Denmark

  18. Bern Uo (2009) STROBE statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies STROBE statement. https://www.strobe-statement.org/fileadmin/Strobe/uploads/checklists/STROBE_checklist_v4_cross-sectional.pdf. Accessed Mar 2019

  19. Fulmer S, Buchholz B, Scribani M, Jenkins P (2017) Musculoskeletal disorders in Northeast lobstermen. Saf Health Work 8(3):282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.12.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø, Arbejdsmiljøakademiet, Arbejdsmiljørådgiverne (2019) Anbefalinger til rådgivning om smerter i muskler og led på arbejdspladsen—en sammenfatning af evidens og praktiske erfaringer

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Volmar Skovsgaard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 147 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiben, A., Skovsgaard, C.V., Schiøttz-Christensen, B. et al. Back disorder incidence and occupation in Denmark: a cross-sectional register-based study. Eur Spine J 29, 1860–1869 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06382-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06382-y

Keywords