Chronic physical illnesses, mental health disorders, and psychological features as potential risk factors for back pain from childhood to young adulthood: a systematic review with meta-analysis
To report evidence of chronic physical illnesses, mental health disorders, and psychological features as potential risk factors for back pain in children, adolescents, and young adults.
This systematic review and meta-analysis included cohort and inception cohort studies that investigated potential risk factors for back pain in young people. Potential risk factors of interest were chronic physical illnesses, mental health disorders (e.g. depression, anxiety), and other psychological features (e.g. coping, resistance). Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus from inception to July 2019.
Nineteen of 2167 screened articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, and data from 12 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Evidence from inception cohort studies demonstrated psychological distress, emotional coping problems, and somatosensory amplification to be likely risk factors for back pain. Evidence from non-inception cohort studies cannot distinguish between risk factors or back pain triggers. However, we identified several additional factors that were associated with back pain. Specifically, asthma, headaches, abdominal pain, depression, anxiety, conduct problems, somatization, and ‘feeling tense’ are potential risk factors or triggers for back pain. Results from the meta-analyses demonstrated the most likely risk factors for back pain in young people are psychological distress and emotional coping problems.
Psychological features are the most likely risk factors for back pain in young people. Several other factors were associated with back pain, but their potential as risk factors was unclear due to risk of bias. Additional high-quality research is needed to better elucidate these relationships.
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
KeywordsBack pain Systematic review Meta-analysis Risk factors Children Young adult
Quality In Prognostic Studies tool
Number of participants
Low back pain
Body mass index
We would like to thank Cody Davenport for his assistance with the study screening process.
AB, JH, and BW were involved with the concept and design of the study. LB conducted the searches. AB and CH conducted study selection and data extraction. AB analysed and interpreted the data with the assistance of BW, JH, and CH. AB drafted the manuscript and performed revisions with substantial feedback and editing from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was funded by a scholarship from Murdoch University, Western Australia and funding provided by Chiropractic Australia Research Foundation. JH receives salary support from the Canadian Chiropractic Research Foundation and the New Brunswick Health Research Foundation. The funding sources had no involvement in study design, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript preparation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Global Burden of Disease II, Prevalence Collaborators (2018) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392(10159):1789–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB (2003) Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound causation studies in MEDLINE. In: Proceedings of the AMIA symposium, pp 719–723Google Scholar
- 18.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Unit SIGN Observational Studies filter. https://www.sign.ac.uk/search-filters.html. Accessed 28 June 2018
- 22.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR (2011) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- 37.Kanchanomai S, Janwantanakul P, Pensri P, Jiamjarasrangsi W (2015) A prospective study of incidence and risk factors for the onset and persistence of low back pain in Thai university students. Asia Pac J Public Health 27(2):Np106–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539511427579 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Smith A, Beales D, O’Sullivan P, Bear N, Straker L (2017) Low back pain with impact at 17 years of age is predicted by early adolescent risk factors from multiple domains: analysis of the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47(10):752–762. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2017.7464 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar