Skip to main content

Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and healthy controls: a comparative cross-sectional study

A Correction to this article was published on 12 October 2019

This article has been updated



Previous studies have shown poor health-related outcomes among patients with spinal sagittal malalignment of the thoracolumbar or spinopelvic region, and less interest has been paid to the relationship between cervical sagittal balance and functional outcome of the patients. This study aims to compare the cervical sagittal parameters between patients with non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic controls.


Twenty-five patients (21 females/4 males) with non-specific neck pain and 25 age-, sex- and BMI-matched controls (18 females/7 males) participated in the study. Using a standard lateral cervical radiography, the Cobb angle between occiput–C2, C1–C2, C1–C7 and C2–C7 as well as the thoracic inlet angle (TIA) and C7 and T1 slope angles was measured. Also the spine cranial angle (SCA) and the C2–SVA (sacral vertical axis) and C1–SVA were measured. The primary outcome measure of the study was comparison of the sagittal balance variables between the patients and the healthy controls. Secondary outcome measures were correlation between pain intensity of the patients in neck pain group and their demographic and radiographic findings. Data analysis was performed using independent sample T test and Pearson’s correlation for primary and secondary outcome measurements, respectively.


There was no difference in cervical lordosis curvature (measured by C2–C7 and C1–C7 lordosis angle) between patients with non-specific NP and healthy controls (P value = 0.45 and 0.37, respectively). We found that T1 slope angle was significantly (P value = 0.02) lower in patients with neck pain.


Our findings showed that the slope of the upper endplate of T1 vertebrae body (T1 slope) is significantly lower among patients with non-specific neck pain compared to controls. A compensatory mechanism to bring the center of head gravity back to the spinal axis might be the possible explanation for this difference.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Change history

  • 12 October 2019

    Unfortunately, the affiliation of the second author (Jean Charles Le Huec) was incorrectly published in the original publication.

  • 12 October 2019

    Unfortunately, the affiliation of the second author (Jean Charles Le Huec) was incorrectly published in the original publication.


  1. 1.

    Haldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Schubert J, Nygren Å (2008) The bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Eur Spine J 17:5–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M (2012) Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2163–2196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McLean SM, May S, Klaber-Moffett J, Sharp DM, Gardiner E (2010) Risk factors for the onset of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Commun Health 64:565–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nguyen N-LM, Baluch DA, Patel AA (2014) Cervical sagittal balance: a review. Contemp Spine Surg 15:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30:2024–2029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, Rigal J, Aunoble S (2011) Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics. Eur Spine J 20:558–563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gore DR (2001) Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2463–2466

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Moon BJ, Choi KH, Yun C, Ha Y (2015) Cross-sectional study of neck pain and cervical sagittal alignment in air force pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 86:445–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Iyer S, Nemani VM, Nguyen J, Elysee J, Burapachaisri A, Ames CP, Kim HJ (2016) Impact of cervical sagittal alignment parameters on neck disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Grob D, Frauenfelder H, Mannion AF (2007) The association between cervical spine curvature and neck pain. Eur Spine J 16:669–678.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kwon TH, Park YK, Moon HJ (2015) The relationship between neck pain and cervical alignment in young female nursing staff. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 58:231–235.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fujiwara H, Oda T, Makino T, Moriguchi Y, Yonenobu K, Kaito T (2018) Impact of cervical sagittal alignment on axial neck pain and health-related quality of life after cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study. Clin Spine Surg 31:E245–E251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tsunoda D, Iizuka Y, Iizuka H, Nishinome M, Kobayashi R, Ara T, Yamamoto A, Takagishi K (2013) Associations between neck and shoulder pain (called katakori in Japanese) and sagittal spinal alignment parameters among the general population. J Orthop Sci 18:216–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee JH, Park YK, Kim JH (2014) Chronic neck pain in young adults: perspectives on anatomic differences. Spine J 14:2628–2638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R, Yayama T, Mwaka ES, Kobayashi S, Baba H (2009) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis or sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 11:521–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Miyazaki M, Hymanson HJ, Morishita Y, He W, Zhang H, Wu G, Kong MH, Tsumura H, Wang JC (2008) Kinematic analysis of the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc degeneration in the cervical spine. Spine 33:E870–E876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ, Haldeman S, Côté P, Carragee EJ, Peloso PM, van der Velde G, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Nordin M, Cassidy JD (2008) A new conceptual model of neck pain: linking onset, course, and care: the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 33:S14–S23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, Glassman SD, Suk S-I, Cha CW (2005) Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36″ radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 30:427–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Carreon LY, Smith CL, Dimar JR, Glassman SD (2016) Correlation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters on full-length spine radiographs compared with dedicated cervical radiographs. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Weng C, Wang J, Tuchman A, Wang J, Fu C, Hsieh PC, Buser Z, Wang JC (2016) Influence of T1 slope on the cervical sagittal balance in degenerative cervical spine: an analysis using kinematic MRI. Spine 41:185–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Silber JS, Lipetz JS, Hayes VM, Lonner BS (2004) Measurement variability in the assessment of sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: a comparison of the Gore and Cobb methods. Clin Spine Surg 17:301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20:1351–1358

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F (2010) The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 10:994–998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ling FP, Chevillotte T, Leglise A, Thompson W, Bouthors C, Le Huec JC (2018) Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review. Eur Spine J 27:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gay RE (1993) The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance. J Manip Physiol Ther 16:591–594

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kumagai G, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Inoue R, Iwasaki H, Ishibashi Y, Iwane K, Matsuzaka M, Takahashi I, Umeda T, Nakaji S (2014) Association between roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine and neck symptoms in a Japanese community population. J Orthop Sci 19:390–397.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Yoshiaki T, Shiga H (1998) Cervical curvature in acute whiplash injuries: prospective comparative study with asymptomatic subjects. Injury 29:775–778.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    McAviney J, Schulz D, Bock R, Harrison DE, Holland B (2005) Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints. J Manip Physiol Ther 28:187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lee S-H, Kim K-T, Seo E-M, Suk K-S, Kwack Y-H, Son E-S (2012) The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. Clin Spine Surg 25:E41–E47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lee S-H, Son E-S, Seo E-M, Suk K-S, Kim K-T (2015) Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment. Spine J 15:705–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Grauer J, Babat LB, Dvorak J (1998) Critical load of the human cervical spine: an in vitro experimental study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 13:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Takahata T (2011) Cross-sectional area of posterior extensor muscles of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Spine J 20:1567–1573.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Noormohammadpour P, Mansournia MA, Koohpayehzadeh J, Asgari F, Rostami M, Rafei A, Kordi R (2017) Prevalence of chronic neck pain, low back pain, and knee pain and their related factors in community-dwelling adults in Iran: a population-based national study. Clin J Pain 33:181–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Rostami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This work was supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 140 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jouibari, M.F., Le Huec, J.C., Ranjbar Hameghavandi, M.H. et al. Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and healthy controls: a comparative cross-sectional study. Eur Spine J 28, 2319–2324 (2019).

Download citation


  • Sagittal balance
  • Non-specific neck pain
  • Malalignment