Radiological protocol in spinal trauma: literature review and Spinal Cord Society position statement
The Spinal Cord Society constituted a panel tasked with reviewing the literature on the radiological evaluation of spinal trauma with or without spinal cord injury and recommend a protocol. This position statement provides recommendations for the use of each modality, i.e., radiographs (X-rays), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as vascular imaging, and makes suggestions on identifying or clearing spinal injury in trauma patients.
PubMed was searched for the corresponding keywords from January 1, 1980, to August 1, 2017. A MEDLINE search was subsequently undertaken after applying MeSH filters. Appropriate cross-references were retrieved. Out of the 545 articles retrieved, 105 relevant papers that address the present topic were studied and the extracted content was circulated for further discussions. A draft position statement was compiled and circulated among the panel members via e-mail. The draft was modified by incorporating relevant suggestions to reach a consensus.
Results and conclusion
For imaging cervical and thoracolumbar spine trauma patients, CT without contrast is generally considered to be the initial line of imaging and radiographs are required if CT is unavailable or unaffordable. CT screening in polytrauma cases is best done with a multidetector CT by utilizing the reformatted images obtained when scanning the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT-CAP). MRI is indicated in cases with neurological involvement and advanced cervical degenerative changes and to determine the extent of soft tissue injury, i.e., disco-ligamentous injuries as well as epidural space compromise. MRI is also usually performed when X-rays and CT are unable to correlate with patient symptomatology.
KeywordsCervical spine trauma Thoracolumbar spine trauma Spinal cord injury X-rays Computed tomography Magnetic resonance imaging Protocol Position statement
There are no financial grants received for conducting this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There are no potential conflicts of interest.
- 5.Schwartz ED, Flanders AE (2007) Spinal trauma: imaging, diagnosis, and management, 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1–3Google Scholar
- 6.Eze CU, Abonyi LC, Ohagwu CC, Eze JC (2013) Pattern of plain X-ray findings in bone injuries among motorcycle accident victims in Lagos, Nigeria. I Res J Med Sci 1:51–55Google Scholar
- 13.Blackmore CC, Ramsey SD, Mann FA, Deyo RA (1999) Cervical spine screening with CT in Trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 212:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl08117 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA et al (2007) The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2365. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181557b92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Brohi K, Healy M, Fotheringham T et al (2005) Helical computed tomographic scanning for the evaluation of the cervical spine in the unconscious, intubated trauma patient. J Trauma 58:897–901. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.00005373-200505000-00003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Padayachee L, Cooper DJ, Irons S et al (2006) Cervical spine clearance in unconscious traumatic brain injury patients: dynamic flexion-extension fluoroscopy versus computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 60:341–345. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000195716.73126.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Stassen NA, Williams VA, Gestring ML et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging in combination with helical computed tomography provides a safe and efficient method of cervical spine clearance in the obtunded trauma patient. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 60:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000197647.44202.de CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Hogan GJ, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Scalea TM (2005) Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal? Radiology 237:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2371040697 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.D’Alise MD, Benzel EC (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the cervical spine in the comatose or obtunded trauma patient. Embase J Neurosurg 91:54–59Google Scholar
- 34.Horn EM, Lekovic GP, Feiz-Erfan I et al (2004) Cervical magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities not predictive of cervical spine instability in traumatically injured patients. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:39–42. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2004.1.1.0039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46.Rozycki GS, Tremblay L, Feliciano DV et al (2002) A prospective study for the detection of vascular injury in adult and pediatric patients with cervicothoracic seatbelt signs. J Trauma 52(618–624):7pGoogle Scholar
- 65.Cooper C, Dunham CM, Rodriguez A (1995) Falls and major injuries are risk factors for thoracolumbar fractures: cognitive impairment and multiple injuries impede the detection of back pain and tenderness. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 38:692–696. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199505000-00003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 75.Patten RM, Gunberg SR, Brandenburger DK (2000) Frequency and importance of transverse process fractures in the lumbar vertebrae at helical abdominal CT in patients with trauma. Radiology 215:831–834. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn27831 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 76.Rhee PM, Bridgeman A, Acosta JA et al (2002) Lumbar fractures in adult blunt trauma: axial and single-slice helical abdominal and pelvic computed tomographic scans versus portable plain films. J Trauma 53:663–667. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200210000-00007 (discussion 667) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 79.Sheridan R, Peralta R, Rhea J et al (2003) Reformatted visceral protocol helical computed tomographic scanning allows conventional radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine to be eliminated in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. J Trauma 55:665–669. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000048094.38625.B5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 82.Berry GE, Adams S, Harris MB et al (2005) Are plain radiographs of the spine necessary during evaluation after blunt trauma? Accuracy of screening torso computed tomography in thoracic/lumbar spine fracture diagnosis. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 59:1410–1413. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000197279.97113.0e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 84.Kim S, Yoon CS, Ryu JA et al (2010) A comparison of the diagnostic performances of visceral organ-targeted versus spine-targeted protocols for the evaluation of spinal fractures using sixteen-channel multidetector row computed tomography: is additional spine-targeted computed tomography nec. J Trauma 69:437–446. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e491d8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 95.Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA, Hurlbert RJ et al (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2325–2333. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0276-1092(08)70533-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 99.Korres DS, Boscainos PJ, Papagelopoulos PJ et al (2003) Multiple level noncontiguous fractures of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000068362.47147.a2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 105.Agarwal Y, Sureka B, Kumar N (2015) Radiologic imaging in spinal trauma. In: Chhabra HS (ed) ISCoS textbook of comprehensive management of spinal cord injuries, 1st edn. Wolters Kluwer, Chandigarh, pp 100–133Google Scholar