Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 7, pp 1603–1609 | Cite as

The association between sacroiliac joint-related pain following lumbar spine surgery and spinopelvic parameters: a prospective multicenter study

  • Juichi TonosuEmail author
  • Daisuke Kurosawa
  • Takako Nishi
  • Keisuke Ito
  • Daijiro Morimoto
  • Yoshiro Musha
  • Hiroshi Ozawa
  • Eiichi Murakami
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively calculate the incidence of postoperative sacroiliac joint-related pain (SIJP) and investigate the association between spinopelvic parameters and postoperative SIJP after lumbar spine surgery.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. We defined postoperative SIJP as unilateral buttock pain according to fulfillment of the following criteria within 3 months of the surgery: a sacroiliac joint (SIJ) score higher than 4/9 postoperatively; positive response to analgesic periarticular SIJ injection with fluoroscopy; no other complications related to the surgery. The patients were divided into the SIJP group and non-SIJP group. We compared the background information and analyzed the differences in spinopelvic parameters in both groups. Additionally, receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to evaluate the cutoff values of spinopelvic parameters.

Results

Of the 281 patients enrolled, 265 were included and eight developed postoperative SIJP (3.0%). There were no significant differences in the background information between groups. Preoperative and postoperative radiological evaluations revealed that the pelvic incidence (PI) in the SIJP group was significantly higher than that in the non-SIJP group, and there were no significant differences in lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and PI minus LL. For preoperative PI, the area under the curve, cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.73739, 59, 62.5%, and 81.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

The incidence of postoperative SIJP after lumbar spine surgery was 3.0%. Higher PI values were associated with a higher risk of postoperative SIJP.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

Sacroiliac joint-related pain Lumbar spine surgery Postoperative pain Spinopelvic parameters Pelvic incidence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the medical clerks at the hospitals for collecting the data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Supplementary material

586_2019_5952_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (167 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 167 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bernard TN, Classidy JD (1997) The sacroiliac joint syndrome. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. In: Frymoyer JW (ed) The adult spine: principles and practice. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 2343–2363Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD, Lindley EM, Kitchel SH, Patel VV (2016) Sacroiliac joint pain and its treatment. Clin Spine Surg 29:42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simopoulos TT, Manchikanti L, Singh V, Gupta S, Hameed H, Diwan S, Cohen SP (2012) A systematic evaluation of prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician 15:E305–E344Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B (2008) European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 17:794–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N (1995) The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine 20:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deyo RA, Weinstein JN (2001) Low back pain. N Engl J Med 344:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurosawa D, Murakami E, Ozawa H, Koga H, Isu T, Chiba Y, Abe E, Unoki E, Musha Y, Ito K, Katoh S, Yamaguchi T (2017) A diagnostic scoring system for sacroiliac joint pain originating from the posterior ligament. Pain Med 18:228–238Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shin MH, Ryu KS, Hur JW, Kim JS, Park CK (2013) Comparative study of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment between patients with and without sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 38:E1334–E1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cho DY, Shin MH, Hur JW, Ryu KS, Park CK (2013) Sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in patients with sacroiliac joint pain following lumbar fusion surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 54:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Unoki E, Abe E, Murai H, Kobayashi T, Abe T (2016) Fusion of multiple segments can increase the incidence of sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. Spine 41:999–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schomacher M, Kunhardt O, Koeppen D, Moskopp D, Kienapfel H, Kroppenstedt S, Cabraja M (2015) Transient sacroiliac joint-related pain is a common problem following lumbar decompressive surgery without instrumentation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 139:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35:2224–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murakami E, Aizawa T, Noguchi K, Kanno H, Okuno H, Uozumi H (2008) Diagram specific to sacroiliac joint pain site indicated by one-finger test. J Orthop Sci 13:492–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kurosawa D, Murakami E, Aizawa T (2015) Referred pain location depends on the affected section of the sacroiliac joint. Eur Spine J 24:521–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murakami E, Kurosawa D, Aizawa T (2017) Treatment strategy for sacroiliac joint-related pain at or around the posterior superior iliac spine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 165:43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernard TN Jr, Kirkaldy-Willis WH (1987) Recognizing specific characteristics of nonspecific low back pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 217:266–280Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sakamoto N, Yamashita T, Takebayashi T, Sekine M, Ishii S (2001) An electrophysiologic study of mechanoreceptors in the sacroiliac joint and adjacent tissues. Spine 26:E468–E471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murakami E, Tanaka Y, Aizawa T, Ishizuka M, Kokubun S (2007) Effect of periarticular and intraarticular lidocaine injections for sacroiliac joint pain: prospective comparative study. J Orthop Sci 12:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borowsky CD, Fagen G (2008) Sources of sacroiliac region pain: insights gained from a study comparing standard intra-articular injection with a technique combining intra- and peri-articular injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:2048–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maigne JY, Planchon CA (2005) Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks. Eur Spine J 14:654–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cecchinato R, Redaelli A, Martini C, Morselli C, Villafañe JH, Lamartina C, Berjano P (2017) Long fusions to S1 with or without pelvic fixation can induce relevant acute variations in pelvic incidence: a retrospective cohort study of adult spine deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 26(Suppl 4):436–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K (2016) Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J 25:3675–3686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Le Huec JC, Hasegawa K (2016) Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects. Eur Spine J 25:3630–3637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T, Yoshida M (2018) Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J 27:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chaléat-Valayer E, Mac-Thiong JM, Paquet J, Berthonnaud E, Siani F, Roussouly P (2011) Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):634–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Araújo F, Lucas R, Alegrete N, Azevedo A, Barros H (2014) Sagittal standing posture, back pain, and quality of life among adults from the general population: a sex-specific association. Spine 39:E782–E794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):609–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen SP (2005) Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Anesth Analg 101:1440–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juichi Tonosu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daisuke Kurosawa
    • 2
  • Takako Nishi
    • 3
  • Keisuke Ito
    • 4
  • Daijiro Morimoto
    • 5
  • Yoshiro Musha
    • 4
  • Hiroshi Ozawa
    • 6
  • Eiichi Murakami
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryKanto Rosai HospitalKawasaki CityJapan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery/Low Back Pain and Sacroiliac Joint CenterJCHO Sendai HospitalSendaiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryYoshida Orthopedic HospitalToyotaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Spine SurgeryToho University Ohashi HospitalTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Department of Neurological SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
  6. 6.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations