ISSLS PRIZE IN CLINICAL SCIENCE 2019: clinical importance of trunk muscle mass for low back pain, spinal balance, and quality of life—a multicenter cross-sectional study

Abstract

Study design

A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Objectives

To clarify the relationship of trunk muscle mass with low back pain, spinal sagittal balance, and quality of life.

Summary of background data

Few reports have investigated the relationship of trunk muscle mass with lumbar spine function and spinal balance, and the clinical significance of trunk muscle mass remains unclear.

Methods

Patients attending spinal outpatient clinics at 10 different medical institutions were enrolled in this study. Patient demographics, trunk muscle mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ5D) score were investigated. Multivariate nonlinear regression analysis was used to investigate the association of trunk muscle mass with the ODI, VAS score, SVA, and EQ5D score.

Results

Of 2551 eligible patients, 1738 (mean age 70.2 ± 11.0 years; 781 men and 957 women) were enrolled. Trunk muscle mass was significantly correlated with the ODI, VAS score, SVA, and EQ5D score (P < 0.001) when adjusted for age, sex, BMI, ASM, CCI, and history of lumbar surgery. Patient deterioration was associated with a decrease in trunk muscle mass, and the deterioration accelerated from approximately 23 kg.

Conclusions

Trunk muscle mass was significantly associated with the ODI, VAS score, SVA, and EQ5D score. Trunk muscle mass may assume an important role to elucidate and treat lumbar spinal dysfunction and spinal imbalance.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Overview of vital statistics in 2017. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/kakutei17/index.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2018

  2. 2.

    Vos T, Allen C, Arora M et al (2016) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388:1545–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Yu H et al (2018) The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5432-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR et al (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2024–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hassanzadeh H, Jain A, El Dafrawy MH et al (2013) Three-column osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformity in adult patients 60 years old and older: outcome and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:726–731. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827c2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bhagat S, Vozar V, Lutchman L et al (2013) Morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery: Norwich Spinal Unit experience. Eur Spine J 22:42–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2627-y

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Soroceanu A, Burton DC, Oren JH et al (2016) Medical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1718–1723. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yagi M, Hosogane N, Watanabe K et al (2015) The paravertebral muscle and psoas for the maintenance of global spinal alignment in patient with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine J 16:451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hebert JJ, Kjaer P, Fritz JM, Walker BF (2014) The Relationship of lumbar multifidus muscle morphology to previous, current, and future low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shahidi B, Parra CL, Berry DB et al (2017) Contribution of lumbar spine pathology and age to paraspinal muscle size and fatty infiltration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:616–623. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hyun S-J, Bae C-W, Lee S-H, Rhim S-C (2013) Fatty Degeneration of Paraspinal Muscle in Patients With the Degenerative Lumbar Kyphosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 29:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa28b0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Menezes-Reis R, Bonugli GP, Salmon CEG et al (2018) Relationship of spinal alignment with muscular volume and fat infiltration of lumbar trunk muscles. PLoS ONE 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jun HS, Kim JH, Ahn JH et al (2016) The effect of lumbar spinal muscle on spinal sagittal alignment: evaluating muscle quantity and quality. Neurosurgery 79:847–855. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Teichtahl AJ, Urquhart DM, Wang Y et al (2015) Fat infiltration of paraspinal muscles is associated with low back pain, disability, and structural abnormalities in community-based adults. Spine J 15:1593–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPINEE.2015.03.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC et al (2000) CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. Eur Spine J 9:266–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860000190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Ross R (2002) Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:889–896. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50216.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yoshida D, Shimada H, Park H et al (2014) Development of an equation for estimating appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Japanese older adults using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Geriatr Gerontol Int 14:851–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kim M, Shinkai S, Murayama H, Mori S (2015) Comparison of segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body composition in a community-dwelling older population. Geriatr Gerontol Int 15:1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Fujimoto K, Inage K, Eguchi Y et al (2018) Use of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the measurement of appendicular skeletal muscle mass/whole fat mass and its relevance in assessing osteoporosis among patients with low back pain: a comparative analysis using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Asian Spine J 12:839–845. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.5.839

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J et al (2014) Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian working group for sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 15:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM et al (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 39:412–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Shimokata H, Ando F, Yuki A, Otsuka R (2014) Age-related changes in skeletal muscle mass among community-dwelling Japanese: a 12-year longitudinal study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 14(Suppl 1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Doherty TJ (2003) Invited review: aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95:1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00347.2003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Park S, Kim HJ, Ko BG et al (2016) The prevalence and impact of sarcopenia on degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Bone Joint J 98-B:1093–1098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tanishima S, Hagino H, Matsumoto H et al (2017) Association between sarcopenia and low back pain in local residents prospective cohort study from the GAINA study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1807-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Shahtahmassebi B, Hebert JJ, Hecimovich MD, Fairchild TJ (2017) Associations between trunk muscle morphology, strength and function in older adults. Sci Rep 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11116-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kjaer P, Bendix T, Sorensen JS et al (2007) Are MRI-defined fat infiltrations in the multifidus muscles associated with low back pain? BMC Med 5:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-5-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kado DM, Huang MH, Karlamangla AS et al (2013) Factors associated with kyphosis progression in older women: 15 years’ experience in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 28:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1728

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yamamoto J, Bergstrom J, Davis A et al (2017) Trunk lean mass and its association with 4 different measures of thoracic kyphosis in older community dwelling persons. PLoS ONE 12:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174710

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Satomi Kawabata, Yoshika Notani, Yuka Tatsumi, and Aiko Nakashima for their help in collecting the data and conducting interviews with the patients.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Research Grant.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masatoshi Hoshino.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests; each author certifies that no commercial relationships exist that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with this article.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Osaka City University (number 3806).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 176 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hori, Y., Hoshino, M., Inage, K. et al. ISSLS PRIZE IN CLINICAL SCIENCE 2019: clinical importance of trunk muscle mass for low back pain, spinal balance, and quality of life—a multicenter cross-sectional study. Eur Spine J 28, 914–921 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05904-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Lumbar spine
  • Low back pain
  • Trunk muscles
  • Kyphosis
  • Sarcopenia