Skip to main content

The effect of patient positioning on the relative position of the aorta to the thoracic spine

European Spine Journal volume 28, pages 477–483 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the thoracic aorta is crucial for thoracolumbar spinal surgery. The purpose of the present study is to describe the relative displacement of the aorta to the spine in supine, prone and prone position with padding. Improved understanding of the magnitude and direction of this often-overlooked change could benefit preoperative planning and decision-making.

Methods

A total of 200 patients underwent CT scan of the thoracic spine in the standard supine, prone and prone position with padding. Axial CT images from T4 to T12, in all three different positions, were selected and the following parameters were measured: (a) distance B connecting left pedicle entry point to the edge of the aortic wall and (b) projections Bx and By, representing the minimum AP depth and horizontal displacement of the aortic wall relative to the left pedicle entry point O.

Results

There was a significant difference in the distance B between the three different positions across all thoracic vertebrae levels, confirming that positioning significantly affects aorta’s relative position. Moreover, in the prone position with padding at the level of T6, the aortic wall lies at a minimum distance from the left pedicular axis and thus from the typical screw trajectory.

Conclusion

The results of this study show that prone positioning for posterior thoracolumbar approach affects significantly the anatomic relationship of the aorta to the spine. Surgeons should be aware that standard supine CT evaluation represents a static technique, which can differ considerably from surgical reality.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved from electronic supplementary material.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Bridwell KH (2005) Indications and techniques for anterior-only and combined anterior and posterior approaches for thoracic and lumbar spine deformities. Instr Course Lect 54:559–565

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reddi V, Clarke DV Jr, Arlet V (2008) Anterior thoracoscopic instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Spine 33:1986–1994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong HK, Hee HT, Yu Z, Wong D (2004) Results of thoracoscopic instrumented fusion versus conventional posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing selective thoracic fusion. Spine 29:2031–2038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Nakao Y et al (2010) Aorta movement in patients with scoliosis after posterior surgery. Spine 35:E1571–E1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu F, Chen WJ, Wang WJ et al (2011) Migration of thoracic aorta after the anterior correction of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis without parietal pleura closure. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:390–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Sugita S et al (2011) Is a right pedicle screw always away from the aorta in scoliosis? Spine 36:E1519–E1524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wegener B, Birkenmaier C, Fottner A, Jansson V, Durr HR (2008) Delayed perforation of the aorta by a thoracic pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 17(Suppl 2):S351–S354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tschoeke SK, Gahr P, Krug L, Kasper AS, Heyde CE, Ertel W (2011) Late diagnosis of pedicle screw malplacement with perforation of the thoracic aorta after posterior stabilization in a patient with multiple myeloma: case report. Spine 36:E886–E890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang W, Zhu Z, Zhu F et al (2008) The changes of relative position of the thoracic aorta after anterior or posterior instrumentation of type I Lenke curve in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 17:1019–1026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Milbrandt TA, Sucato DJ (2007) The position of the aorta relative to the spine in patients with left thoracic scoliosis: a comparison with normal patients. Spine 32:E348–E353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bullmann V, Fallenberg EM, Meier N et al (2006) The position of the aorta relative to the spine before and after anterior instrumentation in right thoracic scoliosis. Spine 31:1706–1713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huitema GC, Cornips EM, Castelijns MH, van Ooij A, van Santbrink H, van Rhijn LW (2007) The position of the aorta relative to the spine: is it mobile or not? Spine 32:1259–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore K (1985) The thoracic aorta. Clinically oriented anatomy, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 132–133

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore K (1985) The abdominal aorta. Clinically oriented anatomy, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 283–284

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang H, Qiu X, Wang W et al (2012) The position of the aorta changes with altered body position in single right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 37:E1054–E1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sucato DJ, Duchene C (2003) The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1461–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sevastik B, Xiong B, Hedlund R, Sevastik J (1996) The position of the aorta in relation to the vertebra in patients with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Surg Radiol Anat 18:51–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohashi M, Ito T, Hirano T, Endo N (2012) Variation of the position of the aorta relative to a kyphotic thoracic spine: safety margin for pedicle screw placement in the adult Japanese population. Spine 37:261–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Ono T et al (2010) New parameters to represent the position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 19:815–820

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarwahi V, Gecelter RC, Wendolowski SF et al (2015) CT-based anatomical evaluation of pre-vertebral structures with respect to vertebral body using a clock-face analogy. Spine 40:1918–1925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huitema GC, van Rhijn LW, van Ooij A (2006) Screw position after double-rod anterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis: an evaluation using computerized tomography. Spine 31:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sucato DJ, Kassab F, Dempsey M (2004) Analysis of screw placement relative to the aorta and spinal canal following anterior instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:554–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bullmann V, Fallenberg EM, Meier N et al (2005) Anterior dual rod instrumentation in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis: a computed tomography analysis of screw placement relative to the aorta and the spinal canal. Spine 30:2078–2083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarlak AY, Tosun B, Atmaca H, Sarisoy HT, Buluc L (2009) Evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J18:1892–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lavigne F, Mascard E, Laurian C, Dubousset J, Wicart P (2009) Delayed-iatrogenic injury of the thoracic aorta by an anterior spinal instrumentation. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 2):265–268

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sevuk U, Mesut A, Kiraz I, Kose K, Ayaz F, Erkul A (2016) Delayed presentation of aortic injury by a thoracic pedicle screw. J Card Surg 31:220–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mani K, Rantatalo M, Bjurholm A, Thelin S, Eriksson LG, Wanhainen A (2010) Aortic rupture after spinal correction for scoliosis in the presence of a thoracic stent graft. J Vasc Surg 52:1653–1657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Antonios Galanos M.Sc., Ph.D., biostatistician at the Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS), for his assistance on the statistical analysis of the data of this study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece

    N. Plataniotis, D. S. Evangelopoulos, G. Katzouraki & S. Pneumaticos

  2. Department of Radiology, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece

    N. Plataniotis

Authors
  1. N. Plataniotis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. S. Evangelopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Katzouraki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Pneumaticos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Evangelopoulos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPT 245 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plataniotis, N., Evangelopoulos, D.S., Katzouraki, G. et al. The effect of patient positioning on the relative position of the aorta to the thoracic spine. Eur Spine J 28, 477–483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5812-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5812-9

Keywords

  • Thoracolumbar spine surgery
  • Relative position of thoracic aorta
  • Patient positioning