Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 977–979 | Cite as

Generalizing the results: how can we improve our reports?

  • Mikhail Saltychev
  • Merja Eskola
Letter to the Editor

The most common goal of clinical research is to measure the probable effect of the intervention in clinical practice. Unfortunately, reports are often limited to describing only a studied sample and not an entire population itself. We were interested to investigate how well reports on high-end randomized controlled studies in the field of surgery present information regarding a population outside the studied sample.

The search on PubMed was conducted in January 2018 using the clause: “Eur Spine J”[Journal] AND ((Controlled Clinical Trial[ptyp] OR Randomized Controlled Trial[ptyp]) AND (“2017/01/01”[PDAT]: “3000/12/31”[PDAT])). The search resulted in nine randomized controlled trials published in European Spine Journal in 2017 [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. The main outcome measures and statistics reported in the identified trials are shown in Table  1. Of the nine trials, only two employed 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to describe the results obtained from ordinal or continuous...

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

None to declare.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bono CM, Leonard DA, Cha TD, Schwab JH, Wood KB, Harris MB et al (2017) The effect of short (2-weeks) versus long (6-weeks) post-operative restrictions following lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized control trial. Eur Spine J 26(3):905–912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fukui D, Kawakami M, Nakao SI, Miyamoto E, Morishita S, Matuoka T et al (2017) Reduced blood loss and operation time in lumbar posterolateral fusion using a bipolar sealer. Eur Spine J 26(3):726–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson JNA, Subramanian AS, Scott CEH (2017) A randomised controlled trial of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs microdiscectomy. Eur Spine J 26(3):847–856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoy K, Truong K, Andersen T, Bunger C (2017) Addition of TLIF does not improve outcome over standard posterior instrumented fusion. 5–10 years long-term follow-up: results from a RCT. Eur Spine J 26(3):658–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hung PI, Chang MC, Chou PH, Lin HH, Wang ST, Liu CL (2017) Is a drain tube necessary for minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion surgery? Eur Spine J 26(3):733–737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krappel F, Brayda-Bruno M, Alessi G, Remacle JM, Lopez LA, Fernandez JJ et al (2017) Herniectomy versus herniectomy with the DIAM spinal stabilization system in patients with sciatica and concomitant low back pain: results of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Eur Spine J 26(3):865–876CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sturesson B, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Dengler J (2017) Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management. Eur Spine J 26(3):708–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sundseth J, Fredriksli OA, Kolstad F, Johnsen LG, Pripp AH, Andresen H et al (2017) The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Eur Spine J 26(4):1225–1235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yilmaz Yelvar GD, Cirak Y, Dalkilinc M, Parlak Demir Y, Guner Z, Boydak A (2017) Is physiotherapy integrated virtual walking effective on pain, function, and kinesiophobia in patients with non-specific low-back pain? Randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 26(2):538–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ranstam J (2012) Why the P-value culture is bad and confidence intervals a better alternative. Osteoarthr Cartil 20(8):805–808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineTurku University Hospital and University of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Expert ServicesTurku University Hospital and University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations