A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration
- 390 Downloads
To review the current literature on methods of accurate numeration of vertebral segments in patients with Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs). LSTVs are a common congenital anomaly of the L5–S1 junction. While their clinical significance has been debated, unquestionable is the need for their identification prior to spinal surgery. We hypothesize that there are no reliable landmarks by which we can accurately number transitional vertebrae, and thus a full spinal radiograph is required.
A Pubmed and EMBASE search using various combinations of specific key words including “LSTV”, “lumbosacral transitional vertebrae”, “count”, “vertebral numbering”, and “number” was performed.
The gold standard for spinal segment numeration in patients with LSTV remains whole spine imaging and counting caudally, starting from C2. If whole spine imaging is not available, the use of the iliac crest tangent sign on coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has fairly reliable sensitivity and specificity (81 and 64–88%, respectively) for accurate numeration of LSTV. The role of paraspinal anatomic markers such as the right renal artery, superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation, and conus medullaris, for identification of vertebral levels is unreliable and should not be used.
A sagittal whole spine view should be added as a scout view when patients obtain lumbar MRI to standardize the vertebral numbering technique. To date, there has been no other method for accurate numeration of a transitional vertebral segment, other than counting caudally from C2.
KeywordsLumbosacral transitional vertebrae Vertebral numbering Radiograph Vertebral counting
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 15.Bertolotti M (1917) Contributo alla conoscenze dei vizi di differenzazione regionale del rachide con speciale riguardo alla assimilazione sacrale della V. lombrare. Radiologique Medica (Torino) 4:113–144Google Scholar
- 29.O’Brien MF, Kiklo T, Blanke KM, Lenke LG, Spinal Deformity Study Group (SDSG) (Editors in Chief) (2008) Radiographic measurement manual. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., MemphisGoogle Scholar
- 36.Tins B et al (1016) Three-dimensional sampling perfection with application-optimised contrasts using a different flip angle evolutions sequence for routine imaging of the spine: preliminary experience. Br J Radiol 2012(85):e480–e489Google Scholar
- 43.Bailey W, Carter RA (1938) Anomalies of the spine: a correlation of anatomical, roentgenological, and clinical findings. Calif West Med 49(1):46–52Google Scholar
- 46.Moustafa AHMN, Gawad EAMA, El-Khadrawi TAA (2011) Multidetector CT of the vertebral column: count with confidence & get trusted level for surgery. El-Minia Med Bull 22(2):11Google Scholar