Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the threshold of the curve difference on ultrasound measurement relative to the previous radiographic measurements to detect curves progression in children who have idiopathic scoliosis (IS).
Methods
Two hundred children with IS (F:170, M:30; mean age: 14.6 ± 1.9) were recruited from a single center. A retrospective study on comparing the current ultrasound measurements with the previous radiographic measurements with threshold values from 3° to 8° to detect curve progression was conducted. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, accuracy (ACC), and odd ratio (OR) were calculated to determine the optimal threshold value of the curve differences between ultrasound and previous radiographic measurement.
Results
Both thresholds of 4° and 5° for curve difference from ultrasound scans presented the sensitivities ≥ 0.90 and specificities ≥ 0.85, and can reduce by 73 and 79% of radiographs on the studied subjects, respectively. Especially, for 4° threshold, the negative likelihood ratio (LR−) was only 0.08, which indicated that there is only 8% probability that the subject has progressed if the US measurement detected non-progression.
Conclusions
The ultrasound imaging method can be applied to identify curve progression in children with IS. Four degree is the preferred threshold value to detect the curve which had progressed, since it also had the lower rate of undetected progressed cases (false negatives).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bunnell WP (1988) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 229:20–25
Van Goethem J, Van Campenhout A, van den Hauwe L, Parizel PM (2007) Scoliosis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 17:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2006.12.001
Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 5:261–275
Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:320–327
Lonstein JE, Carlson JM (1984) The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1061–1071
Bunnell WP (1986) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine 11:773–776
Soucacos PN, Zacharis K, Gelalis J, Soultanis K, Kalos N, Beris A et al (1998) Assessment of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7:270–277
Kim H, Kim HS, Moon ES, Yoon C-S, Chung T-S, Song H-T et al (2010) Scoliosis imaging: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 30:1823–1842. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.307105061
Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS, Boice JD (1989) Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X-rays. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1307–1312
Morin Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE et al (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the US scoliosis cohort study. Spine 25:2052–2063
Ronckers CM, Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Land CE (2008) Multiple diagnostic X-rays for spine deformities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17:605–613. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628
Zheng R, Chan ACY, Chen W, Hill DL, Le LH, Hedden D et al (2015) Intra- and inter-rater reliability of coronal curvature measurement for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using ultrasonic imaging method—a pilot study. Spine Deform 3:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.08.008
Young M, Hill DL, Zheng R, Lou E (2015) Reliability and accuracy of ultrasound measurements with and without the aid of previous radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Eur Spine J 24:1427–1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3855-8
Zheng R, Young M, Hill D, Le LH, Hedden D, Moreau M et al (2016) Improvement on the accuracy and reliability of ultrasound coronal curvature measurement on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the aid of previous radiographs. Spine 41:404–411. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001244
Zheng Y-P, Lee TT-Y, Lai KK-L, Yip BH-K, Zhou G-Q, Jiang W-W et al (2016) A reliability and validity study for scolioscan: a radiation-free scoliosis assessment system using 3D ultrasound imaging. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0074-y
Cheung CWJ, Zhou GQ, Law SY, Mak TM, Lai KL, Zheng YP (2015) Ultrasound volume projection imaging for assessment of scoliosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34:1760–1768. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2015.2390233
Wang Q, Li M, Lou EHM, Wong MS (2015) Reliability and validity study of clinical ultrasound imaging on lateral curvature of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. PLoS ONE 10:e0135264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135264
Chen W, Le LH, Lou EHM (2012) Ultrasound imaging of spinal vertebrae to study scoliosis. Open J Acoust 02:95–103. https://doi.org/10.4236/oja.2012.23011
Chen W, Lou EHM, Zhang PQ, Le LH, Hill D (2013) Reliability of assessing the coronal curvature of children with scoliosis by using ultrasound images. J Child Orthop 7:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-013-0539-y
Greenhalgh T (1997) How to read a paper. Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests. BMJ 315:540–543
Dougls G Altman, David Machin, Trevor N Bryant, Martin J Gardner (2000) Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. 2nd ed. BMJ
Wilson EB (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22:209–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953
Bunnell WP (1984) An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1381–1387
Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV (1996) Prediction of scoliotic cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer. Spine 21:1661–1666
Goldberg CJ, Kaliszer M, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2001) Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine 26:E55–E63
Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Lee DH, Cho JH (2017) Progression of trunk imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a thoracolumbar/lumbar curve: is it predictable at the initial visit? J Neurosurg Pediatr 20(5):450–455
Guo J, Liu Z, Lv F, Zhu Z, Qian B, Zhang X, Lin X, Sun X, Qiu X (2012) Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21(10):2050–2058
Mao SH, Qian BP, Shi B, Zhu ZZ, Qiu Y (2017) Quantitative evaluation of the relationship between COMP promoter methylation and the susceptibility and curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5309-y
Acknowledgements
This study was supported through funding provided by Scoliosis Research Society and the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, R., Hill, D., Hedden, D. et al. Assessment of curve progression on children with idiopathic scoliosis using ultrasound imaging method. Eur Spine J 27, 2114–2119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5457-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5457-0