The reassuring potential of spinal imaging results: development and testing of a brief, psycho-education intervention for patients attending secondary care
- 576 Downloads
To develop and test a standardised method of interpreting spinal imaging findings in a manner designed to reassure patients with low back pain and promote engagement in an active recovery.
A five-phase development and testing process involved collaborative working party contributions, informal and formal appraisal of the intervention content by clinicians and consumers, a two-stage online evaluation of the take-home patient resource, and onsite testing.
A total of 12 health professionals and 77 consumers were included in formal evaluative processes at various stages of the development and testing process. Consumers assessed the revised iteration of the take-home resource to be clearer and easier to understand than the original version. We integrated all feedback and evaluation outcomes to develop the final intervention content, which was approved by experienced clinicians and considered safe. We devised a framework to guide delivery of the low-cost clinical intervention and a 10–15-min timeframe was demonstrated to be realistic.
We have developed, modified, and tested a pragmatic framework for a brief, psychoeducational intervention. We have established face validity and acceptability from key stakeholders and engaged clinicians and are ready to proceed with a pilot feasibility trial.
KeywordsLow back pain Reassurance Spinal imaging Education Intervention
Emma Karran is supported by the Royal Adelaide Hospital Clinical Research Grants (received 2014 & 2015) and the Royal Adelaide Hospital Research foundation Dawes Scholarship. G. Lorimer Moseley is supported by the NHMRC (Principal Research Fellowship ID: 1061279). GLM has received support from: Pfizer Australia, Kaiser Permanente, Results Physiotherapy, Agile Physiotherapy, Workers’ Compensation Boards in Australia, Europe and North America, the International Olympic Committee and Port Adelaide Football Club. He receives speaker fees for lectures on pain and rehabilitation. He receives royalties for books on pain and rehabilitation. The authors wish to acknowledge valuable contributions and cooperation of all who assisted with the stages described in this manuscript. In particular: Gavin Shepherd, Dave Moen, Yvonne Markey, Chronic Pain Australia, The Australian Pain Management Association, Spinal Clinic staff at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, patients and survey respondents.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All the other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- 1.(NICE) NIFHACE (2016) Low back pain and management in over 16 s: assessment and management. NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59/chapter/Recommendations. Accessed 25 May 2017
- 2.(2015) Toward Optimized Practice (TOP) Low Back Pain Working Group. 2015 December. Evidence-informed primary care management of low back pain: clinical practice guideline. Edmonton, AB: Toward Optimized Practice. Available from: http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/cpgs/885801. Accessed 28 June 2017
- 3.Stochkendahl MJ, Kjaer P, Hartvigsen J, Kongsted A, Aaboe J, Andersen M, Andersen MØ, Fournier G, Højgaard B, Jensen MB, Jensen LD, Karbo T, Kirkeskov L, Melbye M, MorselCarlsen L, Nordsteen J, Palsson TS, Rasti Z, Silbye PF, Steiness MZ, Tarp S, Vaagholt M (2017) National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5099-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA (2017) Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice Guideline from the American College of physicians noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med 166:514–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Howard L, Wessely S, Leese M, Page L, McCrone P, Husain K, Tong J, Dowson A (2005) Are investigations anxiolytic or anxiogenic? A randomised controlled trial of neuroimaging to provide reassurance in chronic daily headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1558–1564CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Borenstein DG, O’Mara JW Jr, Boden SD, Lauerman WC, Jacobson A, Platenberg C, Schellinger D, Wiesel SW (2001) The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects: a 7-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 83:1306–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Suri P, Boyko EJ, Goldberg J, Forsberg CW, Jarvik JG (2014) Longitudinal associations between incident lumbar spine MRI findings and chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms: retrospective analysis of data from the longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBACK). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Karran EL, Moseley GL (2015) UNPUBLISHED data, Doctoral Thesis in Preparation. University of South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- 25.Darlow B, Fullen BM, Dean S, Hurley DA, Baxter GD, Dowell A (2012) The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain 16:3–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Griffin TD, Ohlsson S (2001) Beliefs versus knowledge: a necessary distinction for explaining, predicting, and assessing conceptual change. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp 1–4Google Scholar
- 30.SurveyMonkey Inc. San Mateo, California, USAGoogle Scholar
- 31.Gidwani R, Sinnott P, Avoundjian T, Lo J, Asch SM, Barnett PG (2015) Inappropriate ordering of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: are providers choosing wisely? Am J Manag Care 22:e68–e76Google Scholar