Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased elastin fiber loss in ligamentum flavum of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: results of a pilot histological study
Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is associated with fibrosis, decreased elastin-to-collagen ratio, and hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum (LF). Diabetes mellitus (DM) is known to cause metabolic disturbances within the extracellular matrix in multiple tissues. These alterations may play a major role in the severity of clinical symptoms of LSCS affecting diabetic patients. We aimed to examine the hypothesis that DM may contribute to the LF changes seen in patients with LSCS.
The study cohort included 29 patients: 23 with LSCS (10 with DM vs. 13 without DM) as well as six patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Surgical LF specimens were retrieved for histological assessment. Morphologic quantification of confocal microscopy images using fast Fourier transform analysis allowed us to compare anisotropy and elastin fiber orientation between groups.
There was a significant positive correlation between fasting plasma glucose values and degree of elastin degradation (r = 0.36, p = 0.043). The diabetic patients with LSCS showed a significantly greater loss of elastic fibers (2.3 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.55, p = 0.009), although fibrosis was shown to be similar (1.44 ± 0.7 vs. 1.43 ± 0.88, p = 0.98). There was no significant difference in the degree of calcification in the LSCS group between patients with and without diabetes (1.71 vs. 2.05%, p = 0.653). Fiber orientation was found to be less homogenous in the LSCS compared with the LDH group, although not significantly affected by DM.
The present study points to a significant contribution of DM to the loss of elastin fibers that occurs in the LF of patients with LSCS.
KeywordsLigamentum flavum Elastin Diabetes mellitus Lumbar spinal stenosis
The study was supported by a research grant obtained from the research authority at the Rabin Medical Center.
All authors have demonstrated (1) substantial contributions to research design, or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data; (2) drafting the paper or revising it critically; (3) approval of the submitted and final versions.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Cui G, Watanabe K, Miyauchi Y, Hosogane N, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Miyamoto T, Matsumoto M (2011) Matrix metalloproteinase 13 in the ligamentum flavum from lumbar spinal canal stenosis patients with and without diabetes mellitus. J Orthop Sci 16:785–790. doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0135-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Cavero-Redondo I, Peleteiro B, Alvarez-Bueno C, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Martinez-Vizcaino V (2017) Glycated haemoglobin A1c as a risk factor of cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 7:e015949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015949 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kosaka H, Sairyo K, Biyani A, Leaman D, Yeasting R, Higashino K, Sakai T, Katoh S, Sano T, Goel VK, Yasui N (2007) Pathomechanism of loss of elasticity and hypertrophy of lumbar ligamentum flavum in elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2805–2811. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b650f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Nakamura T, Okada T, Endo M, Kadomatsu T, Taniwaki T, Sei A, Odagiri H, Masuda T, Fujimoto T, Nakamura T, Oike Y, Mizuta H (2014) Angiopoietin-like protein 2 induced by mechanical stress accelerates degeneration and hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. PLoS ONE 9:e85542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085542 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kim KT, Cho DC, Sung JK, Kim CH, Kang H, Kim DH (2017) Changes in HbA1c levels and body mass index after successful decompression surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and lumbar spinal stenosis: results of a 2-year follow-up study. Spine J 17:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar