Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of problem and scripting-based learning on spine surgical trainees’ learning outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the impact of problem and scripting-based learning (PSBL) on spine surgical trainees’ learning outcomes.

Methods

30 spine surgery postgraduate-year-1 residents (PGY-1s) from the First Hospital of China Medical University were randomly divided into two groups. The first group studied spine surgical skills and developed individual judgment under a conventional didactic model, whereas the PSBL group used PBL and Scripted model. A feedback questionnaire and the satisfaction of residents were evaluated by the first assistant surgeon immediately following each procedure. At the end of the study, residents filled out questionnaires focused on identifying the strengths of each teaching method and took a multiple-choice theoretical examination. The results were analyzed by t tests.

Results

Significant difference was found between the two groups in total mean score of preparedness and performance feedback statement (P = 0.01) and the questionnaire by PGY-1’s opinion on the effectiveness of the two teaching methods (P = 0.004). Compared with the non-PSBL group, the PSBL group had significantly higher mean score of pre-operative preparedness (P = 0.01), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in theoretical examination, intra-operative performance, and overall satisfaction with the PGY-1s. The residents found that PSBL could develop their judgment (P = 0.03) and provide greater satisfaction (P = 0.02), and would like to repeat the experience (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

The PSBL method can activate spine residents’ prior knowledge and building on existing cognitive frameworks, which is an important tool for improving pre-operative preparedness. We believe that PSBL is an important first step in training spine residents to become confident and safe spine surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PSBL:

Problem and scripting-based learning

PGY-1s:

Postgraduate-year-1 residents

PBL:

Problem-based learning

References

  1. Novick RJ, Lingard L, Cristancho SM (2015) The call, the save, and the threat: understanding expert help-seeking behavior during nonroutine operative scenarios. J Surg Educ 72:302–309. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gas BL, Mohan M, Jyot A, Buckarma EH, Farley DR (2016) Does scripting operative plans in advance lead to better preparedness of trainees? A pilot study. Am J Surg. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neufeld VR, Barrows HS (1974) The “McMaster Philosophy”: an approach to medical education. J Med Educ 49:1040–1050

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kong J, Li X, Wang Y, Sun W, Zhang J (2009) Effect of digital problem-based learning cases on student learning outcomes in ophthalmology courses. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1211–1214. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neville AJ, Norman GR (2007) PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: three iterations in three decades. Acad Med 82:370–374. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318033385d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Finnesgard EJ, Aho JM, Pandian TK, Farley DR (2016) Effect of rehearsal modality on knowledge retention in surgical trainees: a pilot study. J Surg Educ 73:831–835. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman RJ, Haas S (2011) Strengths and limitations of standards of care to guide the orthopedic surgeon in VTE prevention. Orthopedics 34:121–128. doi:10.3928/01477447-20101221-25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Levy IM, Pryor KW, McKeon TR (2016) Is teaching simple surgical skills using an operant learning program more effective than teaching by demonstration? Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:945–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin-Ferrero MA, Faour-Martin O, Simon-Perez C, Perez-Herrero M, de Pedro-Moro JA (2014) Ambulatory surgery in orthopedics: experience of over 10,000 patients. J Orthop Sci 19:332–338. doi:10.1007/s00776-013-0501-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zilbert NR, St-Martin L, Regehr G, Gallinger S, Moulton CA (2015) Planning to avoid trouble in the operating room: experts’ formulation of the preoperative plan. J Surg Educ 72:271–277. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2008) Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:931–939. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dammers J, Spencer J, Thomas M (2001) Using real patients in problem-based learning: students’ comments on the value of using real, as opposed to paper cases, in a problem-based learning module in general practice. Med Educ 35:27–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kenny NP, Beagan BL (2004) The patient as text: a challenge for problem-based learning. Med Educ 38:1071–1079. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01956.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Akhtar K, Sugand K, Sperrin M, Cobb J, Standfield N, Gupte C (2015) Training safer orthopedic surgeons. Construct validation of a virtual-reality simulator for hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthop 86:616–621

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gasco J, Patel A, Ortega-Barnett J, Branch D, Desai S, Kuo YF, Luciano C, Rizzi S, Kania P, Matuyauskas M, Banerjee P, Roitberg BZ (2014) Virtual reality spine surgery simulation: an empirical study of its usefulness. Neurol Res 36:968–973. doi:10.1179/1743132814y.0000000388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berjano P, Villafañe JH, Vanacker G, Cecchinato R, Ismael M, Gunzburg R, Marruzzo D, Lamartina C (2016) The effect of case-based discussion of topics with experts on learners’ opinions: implications for spinal education and training. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4860-2

    Google Scholar 

  17. Blencowe NS, Glasbey JC, McElnay PJ, Bhangu A, Gokani VJ, Harries RL, Council of the Association of Surgeons in Training (2017) Postgrad Med J. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134737 (Epub ahead of print)

  18. Brunckhorst O, Khan, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2017) Nontechnical skill training and the use of scenarios in modern surgical education. Curr Opin Urol. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000402 (Epub ahead of print)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okubo Y, Matsushita S, Takakuwa Y, Yoshioka T, Nitta K (2016) Longitudinal PBL in undergraduate medical education develops lifelong-learning habits and clinical competencies in social aspects. Tohoku J Exp Med 238:65–74. doi:10.1620/tjem.238.65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing Bei Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001, People’s Republic of China

    Lin Cong, Yue Zhu & Guanjun Tu

  2. Mayo clinic, 100 Third Avenue SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Qi Yan

  3. Department of Neurology, PLA Navy General Hospital, No. 6, Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, People’s Republic of China

    Chenjing Sun

Authors
  1. Lin Cong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qi Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chenjing Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yue Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guanjun Tu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Cong.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was supported by Doctor Research Startup Fund of Liaoning Province (201601114). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cong, L., Yan, Q., Sun, C. et al. Effect of problem and scripting-based learning on spine surgical trainees’ learning outcomes. Eur Spine J 26, 3068–3074 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5135-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5135-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation