Skip to main content

Increased preoperative knowledge reduces surgery-related anxiety: a randomised clinical trial in 100 spinal stenosis patients

European Spine Journal volume 26, pages 2520–2528 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the impact of preoperative knowledge on anxiety, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), disability, and pain in surgically treated spinal stenosis patients.

Methods

One hundred patients were randomised into an intervention group (IG, n = 50) or control group (CG, n = 50). Both groups received routine preoperative patient education. IG additionally underwent a feedback session based on a knowledge test. Primary outcome measure was anxiety at the time of surgery. HRQoL, disability, and pain constituted the secondary outcome measures during a 6-month follow-up.

Results

In IG, a significant reduction in anxiety was noted after the intervention, whereas in CG, anxiety reduced only after the surgery. In both groups, a significant improvement in HRQoL, disability, and pain was noticed at the 6-month follow-up, but there were no between-group differences.

Conclusions

Higher knowledge level may reduce preoperative anxiety but does not seem to affect the self-reported clinical outcomes of surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Ghobrial GM, Mehdi A, Maltenfort M et al (2014) Variability of patient spine education by internet search engine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 118:59–64. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.12.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klemetti S, Leino-Kilpi H, Cabrera E et al (2015) Difference between received and expected knowledge of patients undergoing knee or hip replacement in seven European countries. Clin Nurs Res 24:624–643. doi:10.1177/1054773814549992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinnersley P, Phillips K, Savage K et al (2013) Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009445.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johansson K, Salanterä S, Katajisto J (2007) Empowering orthopaedic patients through preadmission education: results from a clinical study. Patient Educ Couns 66:84–91. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leino-Kilpi H, Luoto E, Katajisto J (1998) Elements of empowerment and MS patients. J Neurosci Nurs 30:116–123. doi:10.1097/01376517-199804000-00005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Phelan EA, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC et al (2001) Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:206–211. doi:10.1097/00007632-200101150-00016

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lurie JD, Spratt KF, Blood EA et al (2011) Effects of viewing an evidence-based video decision aid on patients’ treatment preferences for spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1501–1504. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182055c1e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ng CY, Gibson JNA (2011) An aid to the explanation of surgical risks and complications: the International Spinal Surgery Information Sheet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:2333–2345. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182091bbc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kesänen J, Leino-Kilpi H, Lund T et al (2016) The Knowledge Test Feedback Intervention (KTFI) increases knowledge level of spinal stenosis patients before operation—a randomized controlled follow-up trial. Patient Educ Couns In Press. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.025

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE et al (1983) Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Mind Garden Inc, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bringman H, Giesecke K, Thörne A, Bringman S (2009) Relaxing music as pre-medication before surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:759–764. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01969.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Treasure T, MacRae KD (1999) Minimisation is much better than the randomised block design in certain cases. BMJ 318:1420

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Virtanen H, Leino-Kilpi H, Salanterä S (2007) Empowering discourse in patient education. Patient Educ Couns 66:140–146. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Virtanen H, Leino-Kilpi H, Leinonen K et al (2013) Nursing student control over using a computer simulation program about empowering discourse. Comput Inform Nurs 31:512–522. doi:10.1097/01.NCN.0000432119.56581.24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM (1993) The rand 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ 2:217–227. doi:10.1002/hec.4730020305

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin SY, Huang HA, Lin SC et al (2016) The effect of an anaesthetic patient information video on perioperative anxiety. Eur J Anaesthesiol 33:134–139. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000307

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JS, Park YM, Ha KY et al (2016) Preoperative anxiety about spinal surgery under general anesthesia. Eur Spine J 25:698–707. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3788-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sjöling M, Nordahl G, Olofsson N, Asplund K (2003) The impact of preoperative information on state anxiety, postoperative pain and satisfaction with pain management. Patient Educ Couns 51:169–176. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00191-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koekenbier K, Leino-Kilpi H, Cabrera E et al (2016) Empowering knowledge and its connection to health-related quality of life: a cross-cultural study. Appl Nurs Res 29:211–216. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2015.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J et al (2007) A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 16:1101–1117. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0399-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rolving N, Nielsen CV, Christensen FB et al (2015) Does a preoperative cognitive-behavioral intervention affect disability, pain behavior, pain, and return to work the first year after lumbar spinal fusion surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:593–600. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aalto TJ, Leinonen V, Herno A et al (2011) Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. Eur Spine J 20:1331–1340. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1781-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. McGregor AH, Henley A, Morris TP, Doré CJ (2012) Patients’ views on an education booklet following spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 21:1609–1615. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2242-y

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. McCormick JD, Werner BC, Shimer AL (2013) Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:99–107. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-21-02-99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the role of Riikka Ruuskanen, RN, and Ella Haaranen in the study process. The study was supported by The Finnish Nurses Association, The Finnish Association of Nursing Research, The Research Association of Nurses, and the government research funds Granted by the Orton Research Foundation (9310/401).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland

    Jukka Kesänen, Helena Leino-Kilpi & Kirsi Valkeapää

  2. Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland

    Jukka Kesänen

  3. Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

    Helena Leino-Kilpi

  4. Helsinki University Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Espoo, Finland

    Teija Lund

  5. Orton Orthopaedic Hospital and Research Institute, Orton Foundation, Helsinki, Finland

    Liisa Montin

  6. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Turku, Finland

    Pauli Puukka

Authors
  1. Jukka Kesänen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helena Leino-Kilpi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teija Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liisa Montin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pauli Puukka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kirsi Valkeapää
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jukka Kesänen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kesänen, J., Leino-Kilpi, H., Lund, T. et al. Increased preoperative knowledge reduces surgery-related anxiety: a randomised clinical trial in 100 spinal stenosis patients. Eur Spine J 26, 2520–2528 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4963-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4963-4

Keywords

  • Knowledge level
  • Spinal stenosis surgery
  • Anxiety
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Disability