Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of MRI-defined back muscles volume between patients with ankylosing spondylitis and control patients with chronic back pain: age and spinopelvic alignment matched study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare MRI-defined back muscle volume between AS patients and age, and spinopelvic alignment matched control patients with chronic back pain.

Methods

51 male patients with AS were enrolled. Age and spinopelvic alignment matched controls (male) were found among non-AS patients with chronic back pain. After matching procedure, fully matched controls were found in 31 of 51 AS patients (60.8%), who represent AS patients without deformity. However, matched controls were not found in 20 of 51 AS patients (39.2%), who represent AS patients with deformity. MRI parameters of back muscle (paraspinal muscle and psoas muscle) at L4/5 disc level including cross-sectional area (CSA) and fat-free cross-sectional area (FCSA) were compared between AS patients and matched controls. Covariates, including BMI, self-reported physical activity, and the presence of chronic disease, which can influence back muscle volume, were also investigated.

Results

There were no statistical differences in age, body mass index, score of back pain (NRS), and spinopelvic alignment, and physical activity between matched AS patients and control patients except for duration of back pain. All MRI parameters for paraspinal muscle volume in matched AS patients (without deformity) were significantly less than those of control patients, and significantly larger than those of non-matched AS patients (with deformity). Body size adjusted MRI parameters (relative CSA and relative FCSA) of paraspinal muscle showed strong correlations with lumbar lordosis and sacral slope. Such relationship between paraspinal muscle and spinopelvic parameters remained significant even after multivariate adjustment.

Conclusions

AS patients without deformity already have decreased paraspinal muscle volume compared with age and spinopelvic alignment matched non-AS patients with chronic back pain. Such decrease in paraspinal muscle volume was significantly associated with kyphotic deformity of AS patients even after multivariate adjustment. Although the result of our study supports the causal relationship between muscle degeneration and kyphotic deformity in AS patients, further study is required to prove the causality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akgul O, Gulkesen A, Akgol G, Ozgocmen S (2013) MR-defined fat infiltration of the lumbar paravertebral muscles differs between non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and established ankylosing spondylitis. Mod Rheumatol 23:811–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baraliakos X, Listing J, von der Recke A, Braun J (2011) The natural course of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis: differences between genders and appearance of characteristic radiographic features. Curr Rheumatol Rep 13:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgartner RN, Waters DL, Gallagher D, Morley JE, Garry PJ (1999) Predictors of skeletal muscle mass in elderly men and women. Mech Ageing Dev 107:123–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bot S, Caspers M, Van Royen B, Toussaint H, Kingma I (1999) Biomechanical analysis of posture in patients with spinal kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis: a pilot study. Rheumatology 38:441–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun J, Sieper J (2007) Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 369:1379–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calvo-Gutierrez J, Garrido-Castro JL, Gil-Cabezas J, Gonzalez-Navas C, Ugalde PF, Carmona L, Collantes-Estevez E (2015) Is spinal mobility in patients with spondylitis determined by age, structural damage, and inflammation? Arthritis Care Res 67:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrabba M, Chevallard M, Colombo B, Dworzak F, Mora M, Cornelio F (1983) Muscle pathology in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Y-Y, Pao J-L, Liaw C-K, Hsu W-L, Yang R-S (2014) Image changes of paraspinal muscles and clinical correlations in patients with unilateral lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 23:999–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper R, Forbes WSC, Jayson M (1992) Radiographic demonstration of paraspinal muscle wasting in patients with chronic low back pain. Rheumatology 31:389–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper R, Freemont A, Fitzmaurice R, Alani S, Jayson M (1991) Paraspinal muscle fibrosis: a specific pathological component in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 50:755–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Debigaré R, Marquis K, Côté CH, Tremblay RR, Michaud A, LeBlanc P, Maltais F (2003) Catabolic/anabolic balance and muscle wasting in patients with COPD. CHEST J 124:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dundar U, Solak O, Toktas H, Demirdal U, Subasi V, Kavuncu V, Evcik D (2014) Effect of aquatic exercise on ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatol Int 34:1505–1511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duval-BeaupÃre G, Schmidt C, Cosson P (1992) A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20:451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fortin M, Lazáry PP, Varga I, McCall MC, Battié MC (2016) Paraspinal muscle asymmetry and fat infiltration in patients with symptomatic disc herniation. Eur Spine J 25:1452–1459

  15. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon T, Sage M, Bertouch J, Brooks P (1984) Computed tomography of paraspinal musculature in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 11:794–797

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haroon N (2015) Ankylosis in ankylosing spondylitis: current concepts. Clin Rheumatol 34:1003–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haroon N, Inman RD, Learch TJ, Weisman MH, Lee M, Rahbar MH, Ward MM, Reveille JD, Gensler LS (2013) The impact of tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors on radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 65:2645–2654

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hartvigsen J, Bakketeig LS, Leboeuf Yde C, Engberg M, Lauritzen T (2001) The association between physical workload and low back pain clouded by the “healthy worker” effect: population-based cross-sectional and 5-year prospective questionnaire study. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) 26:1788–1792 (discussion 1792)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hebert JJ, Kjaer P, Fritz JM, Walker BF (2014) The relationship of lumbar multifidus muscle morphology to previous, current, and future low back pain: a 9-year population-based prospective cohort study. Spine 39:1417–1425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography of the lumbar multifidus muscle: comparison of two different modalities. Spine 20:54–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iannuzzi-Sucich M, Prestwood KM, Kenny AM (2002) Prevalence of sarcopenia and predictors of skeletal muscle mass in healthy, older men and women. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 57:M772–M777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang C, Shin M, Kim S, Lee S, Lee C-S (2007) MRI of paraspinal muscles in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients and control patients with chronic low back pain. Clin Radiol 62:479–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim H, Lee C-K, Yeom JS, Lee JH, Cho JH, Shin SI, Lee H-J, Chang B-S (2013) Asymmetry of the cross-sectional area of paravertebral and psoas muscle in patients with degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:1332–1338

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kjaer P, Bendix T, Sorensen J, Korsholm L, Leboeuf-Yde C (2007) Are MRI-defined fat infiltrations in the multifidus muscles associated with low back pain? BMC Med 5:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kubiak EN, Moskovich R, Errico TJ, Di Cesare PE (2005) Orthopaedic management of ankylosing spondylitis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:267–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Landewé R, Dougados M, Mielants H, van der Tempel H, van der Heijde D (2009) Physical function in ankylosing spondylitis is independently determined by both disease activity and radiographic damage of the spine. Ann Rheum Dis 68:863–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee HJ, Lim WH, Park J-W, Kwon BS, Ryu KH, Lee JH, Park YG (2012) The relationship between cross sectional area and strength of back muscles in patients with chronic low back pain. Ann Rehabil Med 36:173–181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JC, Cha J-G, Kim Y, Kim Y-I, Shin B-J (2008) Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in the patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis: comparison with the normal controls. Spine 33:318–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Linden SVD, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lukas C, Landewe R, Sieper J, Dougados M, Davis J, Braun J, Van Der Linden S, Van Der Heijde D, Society AoSi (2009) Development of an ASAS-endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 68:18–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mancini DM, Walter G, Reichek N, Lenkinski R, McCully KK, Mullen JL, Wilson JR (1992) Contribution of skeletal muscle atrophy to exercise intolerance and altered muscle metabolism in heart failure. Circulation 85:1364–1373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martins NA, Furtado GE, Campos MJ, Leitão JC, Filaire E, Ferreira JP (2014) Exercise and ankylosing spondylitis with New York modified criteria: a systematic review of controlled trials with meta-analysis. Acta Reumatol Port 39:298–308

  34. Millner JR, Barron JS, Beinke KM, Butterworth RH, Chasle BE, Dutton LJ, Lewington MA, Lim EG, Morley TB, O'Reilly JE, Pickering KA, Winzenberg T, Zochling J (2016) Exercise for ankylosing spondylitis: an evidence-based consensus statement. Semin Arthritis Rheum 45:411–427

  35. Montano–Loza AJ, Meza–Junco J, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Baracos VE, Bain VG, Sawyer MB (2012) Muscle wasting is associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(166–173):e161

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ochi M, Kohara K, Tabara Y, Kido T, Uetani E, Ochi N, Igase M, Miki T (2010) Arterial stiffness is associated with low thigh muscle mass in middle-aged to elderly men. Atherosclerosis 212:327–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pan T, Qian B-P, Qiu Y (2016) Comparison of sagittal spinopelvic alignment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and thoracolumbar fracture. Medicine 95:e2585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Poddubnyy D, Haibel H, Listing J, Märker-Hermann E, Zeidler H, Braun J, Sieper J, Rudwaleit M (2012) Baseline radiographic damage, elevated acute-phase reactant levels, and cigarette smoking status predict spinal radiographic progression in early axial spondylarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 64:1388–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ramiro S, Stolwijk C, van Tubergen A, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, van den Bosch F, Landewé R (2015) Evolution of radiographic damage in ankylosing spondylitis: a 12 year prospective follow-up of the OASIS study. Ann Rheum Dis 74:52–59

  40. Ranson CA, Burnett AF, Kerslake R, Batt ME, O’Sullivan PB (2006) An investigation into the use of MR imaging to determine the functional cross sectional area of lumbar paraspinal muscles. Eur Spine J 15:764–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sage MR, Gordon T (1983) Muscle atrophy in ankylosing spondylitis: CT demonstration. Radiology 149:780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sansur CA, Fu K-MG, Oskouian Jr RJ, Jagannathan J, Shaffrey CI (2008) Surgical management of global sagittal deformity in ankylosing spondylitis

  43. Simmons EH, Graziano GP, Heffner R (1991) Muscle disease as a cause of kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 16:S361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tveit P, Daggfeldt K, Hetland S, Thorstensson A (1994) Erector spinae lever arm length variations with changes in spinal curvature. Spine 19:199–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vosse D, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Geusens P, Mielants H, Dougados M, van der Linden S (2006) Determinants of hyperkyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 65:770–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wallwork TL, Stanton WR, Freke M, Hides JA (2009) The effect of chronic low back pain on size and contraction of the lumbar multifidus muscle. Manual Therapy 14:496–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Watson P, Booker C, Main C, Chen A (1997) Surface electromyography in the identification of chronic low back pain patients: the development of the flexion relaxation ratio. Clin Biomech 12:165–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorák J, Müntener M (1997) Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine 22:1765–1772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae-Hwan Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Device status/drug statement

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

Ethical approval

Our study is a retrospective case control study, and ethical approval was not tried.

Informed consent

However, informed consent was obtained from all study patients included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bok, D.H., Kim, J. & Kim, TH. Comparison of MRI-defined back muscles volume between patients with ankylosing spondylitis and control patients with chronic back pain: age and spinopelvic alignment matched study. Eur Spine J 26, 528–537 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4889-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4889-2

Keywords

Navigation