Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is reduction better than arthrodesis in situ in surgical management of low-grade spondylolisthesis? A system review and meta analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes included age, sex, operative time, blood loss, and at least 2 years clinical results of Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar lordosis, slippage, fusion rate, the rate of good and excellent and the complication rate. Two authors independently extracted the articles and the predefined data.

Results

Seven eligible studies, involving four RCTs and three cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients who underwent reduction did achieved better slippage correction comparing with arthrodesis in situ (P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in the case of operative time, blood loss, VAS (P = 0.36), ODI (P = 0.50), lumbar lordosis (P = 0.47), the rate of good and excellent (P = 0.84), fusion rate (P = 0.083) and complication rate (P = 0.33) between the arthrodesis in situ group and the reduction group.

Conclusions

On the basis on this review, arthrodesis after reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis potentially reduced vertebral slippage. Reduction was neither associated with a longer operative time nor more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between reduction and arthrodesis in situ group. Both procedures could be expected to achieve good clinical result.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level IIa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeWald RL (1997) Spondylolisthesis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 1201–1210

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hagenmaier HS, Delawi D, Verschoor N, Oner F, van Susante JL (2013) No correlation between slip reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis or change in neuroforaminal morphology and clinical outcome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I (1976) Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (117):23–29

  4. Meyerding HW (1931) Spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 13:39–48

    Google Scholar 

  5. Longo UG, Loppini M, Romeo G, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2014) Evidence-based surgical management of spondylolisthesis: reduction or arthrodesis in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(1):53–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Uysal M, Circi E, Ozalay M, Derincek A, Cinar M (2012) The surgical treatment for a rare case of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis in L4 and L5 lumbar spine: decompression, reduction and fusion. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22(Suppl 1):21–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Etemadifar MR, Hadi A, Masouleh MF (2016) Posterolateral instrumented fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 7:43–49

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schulte TL, Ringel F, Quante M, Eicker SO, Muche-Borowski C, Kothe R (2016) Surgery for adult spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the evidence. Eur Spine J 25(8):2359–2367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Transfeldt EE, Mehbod AA (2007) Evidence-based medicine analysis of isthmic spondylolisthesis treatment including reduction versus fusion in situ for high-grade slips. Spine 32:S126–S129 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs WCH, Vreeling A, De Kleuver M (2006) Fusion for low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 15:391–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ekman P, Moller H, Hedlund R (2005) The long-term effect of posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled study. SPINE J 5:36–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis–a prospective randomized study: part 1. Spine 25:1711–1715 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson ANA, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJO, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS (2007) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 356:2257–2270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bourghli A, Aunoble S, Reebye O, Le Huec JC (2011) Correlation of clinical outcome and spinopelvic sagittal alignment after surgical treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 20:663–668

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sears W (2005) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. Spine J 5:170–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wegmann K, Gundermann S, Siewe J, Eysel P, Delank KS, Sobottke R (2013) Correlation of reduction and clinical outcome in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(12):1639–1644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells GA BSDO (2014) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 12 June 2016

  19. Pan A, Hai Y, Yang J, Zhou L, Chen X, Guo H (2016) Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 25:1522–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams JW, Meerpohl J, Norris SL, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1277–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Egger M, Schneider M, Davey SG (1998) Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 316:140–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Benli IT, Cicek H, Kaya A (2006) Comparison of sagittal plane realignment and reduction with posterior instrumentation in developmental low or high dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Kobe J Med Sci 52:151–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Audat ZM, Darwish FT, Al BM, Obaidat MM, Haddad WH, Bashaireh KM, Al-Aboosy IA (2011) Surgical management of low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis; a randomized controlled study of the surgical fixation with and without reduction. Scoliosis 6:14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lian X, Hou T, Xu J, Zeng B, Zhao J, Liu X, Zhao C, Li H (2013) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: is intentional surgical reduction essential? Spine J 13:1183–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lian XF, Hou TS, Xu JG, Zeng BF, Zhao J, Liu XK, Yang EZ, Zhao C (2014) Single segment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: reduction or fusion in situ. Eur Spine J 23:172–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gong K, Wang Z, Luo Z (2010) Reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with posterior fixation versus transsacral cage fusion in situ with posterior fixation in the treatment of grade 2 adult isthmic spondylolisthesis in the lumbosacral spine. J Neurosurg Spine 13:394–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tay KS, Bassi A, Yeo W, Yue WM (2016) Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion—a 5-year follow-up study. Spine J 16:182–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan G, Gu G, Zhu Y, Guan X, Hu A, Wu X, Zhang H, He S (2016) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis: in situ versus reduction. World Neurosurg 90:580–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ishida Y, Ohmori K, Inoue H, Suzuki K (1999) Delayed vertebral slip and adjacent disc degeneration with an isthmic defect of the fifth lumbar vertebra. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:240–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Beutler WJ, Fredrickson BE, Murtland A, Sweeney CA, Grant WD, Baker D (2003) The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation. Spine 28:1027–1035 (Phila Pa 1976)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Riouallon G, Lachaniette CHF, Poignard A, Allain J (2013) Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a continuous series of 65 cases with an average follow-up of 6.6 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:155–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdu WA, Lurie JD, Spratt KF, Tosteson ANA, Zhao W, Tosteson TD, Herkowitz H, Longely M, Boden SD, Emery S, Weinstein JN (2009) Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 34:2351–2360

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Spruit M, van Jonbergen JPW, de Kleuver M (2005) A concise follow-up of a previous report: posterior reduction and anterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 14:828–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Naderi S, Manisali M, Acar F, Ozaksoy D, Mertol T, Arda MN (2003) Factors affecting reduction in low-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg 99:151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. El Masry MA, El Assuity WI, El Hawary YK, Weatherley CR (2005) Instrumented in situ posterolateral fusion for low-grade lytic spondylolisthesis in adults. Acta Orthop Belg 71(1):83–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. He L, Wang YJ, Gong J, Griffith JF, Zeng X, Kwok AW, Leung JC, Kwok T, Ahuja AT, Leung PC (2014) Prevalence and risk factors of lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly Chinese men and women. Eur Radiol 24:441–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Andersen T, Christensen FB, Langdahl BL, Ernst C, Fruensgaard S, Andersen JL, Rasmussen S, Niedermann B, Helmig P, Holm R, Egund N, Bünger C (2013) Degenerative spondylolisthesis is associated with low spinal bone density: a comparative study between spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Navy General Hospital, No. 6 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China

      Xuedong Bai, Liyang Liu, Xiaochuan Li, Yaohong Wu, Deli Wang & Dike Ruan

    2. Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China

      Jiahai Chen

    Authors
    1. Xuedong Bai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Jiahai Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Liyang Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Xiaochuan Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Yaohong Wu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Deli Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Dike Ruan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Dike Ruan.

    Ethics declarations

    Conflict of interest

    None.

    Additional information

    X. Bai and J. Chen have contributed equally to this work.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Bai, X., Chen, J., Liu, L. et al. Is reduction better than arthrodesis in situ in surgical management of low-grade spondylolisthesis? A system review and meta analysis. Eur Spine J 26, 606–618 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4810-z

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Revised:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4810-z

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation