Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals
- 575 Downloads
This study aims to establish normative data for parameters of spino-pelvic and spinal sagittal alignment, gender related differences and age-related changes in asymptomatic subjects.
A total of 626 asymptomatic volunteers from Japanese population were enrolled in this study, including 50 subjects at least for each gender and each decade from 3rd to 8th. Full length, free-standing spine radiographs were obtained. Cervical lordosis (CL; C3–7), thoracic kyphosis (TK; T1–12), lumbar lordosis (LL; T12–S1), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured.
The average values (degrees) are 4.1 ± 11.7 for CL, 36.0 ± 10.1 for TK, 49.7 ± 11.2 for LL, 53.7 ± 10.9 for PI, 14.5 ± 8.4 for PT, and 39.4 ± 8.0 for SS. Mean SVA is 3.1 ± 12.6 mm. Advancing age caused an increase in CL, PT and SVA, and a decrease in LL and SS. There was a significant gender difference in CL, TK, LL, PI, PT and SVA. From 7th decade to 8th decade, remarkable decrease of LL & TK and increase of PT were seen. A large increase of SVA was also seen between 60’ and 70’.
Standard values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment were established in each gender and each decade from 20’ to 70’. A remarkable change of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment was seen from 7th decade to 8th decade in asymptomatic subjects.
KeywordsStandard value Spine radiograph Spinopelvic sagittal alignment Gender difference Age-related change
This study was supported by institutional funds and by grant research funds, which are intended for promoting hospital functions, of the Japan Labor Health and Welfare Organization (Kawasaki, Japan). No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
- 15.Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O et al (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31(11):E320–E325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Kobayashi T, Abe T, Abe E, Shimada Y (2015) Improvement of spinal alignment and quality of life after corrective surgery for spinal kyphosis in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study with non-operated patients. Osteoporos Int 26(11):2657–2664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K. (2016) Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 22.Dubousset J (1994) Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven Press, New York, pp 480–481Google Scholar