Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 2681–2690 | Cite as

Analysis of the impact of the course of hydration on the mechanical properties of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc

  • Małgorzata ŻakEmail author
  • Celina Pezowicz
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of free hydration on the mechanical parameters of the annulus fibrosus (AF) of the intervertebral disc (IVD), determined in a standard manner. Attention was also given to the hydration occurring in real time and geometric changes resulting from swelling of the AF.

Methods

Uniaxial tensile tests of multilayer samples of the AF with bone attachment were performed for two groups: samples subjected to 30 min of hydration prior to the mechanical test, and control samples, which were not subjected to additional hydration.

Results

As a result of hydration, the values of both the failure stress (σ UTS) and the tensile modulus (E) were lower than in the control group. A decrease in these values was observed for the AF from both the anterior and posterior parts of the IVD.

Conclusions

The tests showed a significant dependence of the determined mechanical parameters on the cross-sectional area. The larger the cross-sectional area, the lower the obtained value of stress. By contrast, the value of the stiffness coefficient is independent of the cross-sectional area. The differences in mechanical parameters are related mainly to water absorption into structures of the AF during hydration. This is confirmed by microscopic analysis of geometric dimensions of the AF during hydration conducted in real time. The greatest changes occurred in the radial direction, where the thickness increased by 2.05 mm, while in the axial direction the main change concerned an increase in height by 0.69 mm. There were negligible changes in the circumferential direction.

Keywords

Swelling Hydration Intervertebral disc Annulus fibrosus Tensile properties 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Acaroglu ER, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Foster RJ, Mow VC, Weidenbaum M (1995) Degeneration and aging affect the tensile behavior of human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(24):2690–2701. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199512150-00010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams MA (1995) Spine update mechanical testing of the spine. Spine 20(19):2151–2156. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams MA, Green TP (1993) Tensile properties of the annulus fibrosus. I. The contribution of fiber-matrix interactions to tensile stiffness and strength. Eur Spine J 2:203–208. doi: 10.1007/BF00299447 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bibby SR, Jones DA, Lee RB, Yu J, Urban JPG (2001) The pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc. Joint Bone Spine 68(6):537–542. doi: 10.1016/S1297-319X(01)00332-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruehlmann SB, Hulme PA, Duncan NA (2004) In situ intercellular mechanics of the bovine outer annulus fibrosus subjected to biaxial strains. J Biomech 37:223–231. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00244-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruehlmann SB, Rattner JB, Matyas JR, Duncan NA (2002) Regional variations in the cellular matrix of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. J Anat 201:159–171. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00080.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Costi JJ, Hearn TC, Fazzalari NL (2002) The effect of hydration on the stiffness of intervertebral discs in an ovine model. Clin Biomech 17:446–455. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00035-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhillon N, Bass EC, Lotz JC (2001) Effect of frozen storage on the creep behavior of human intervertebral discs. Spine 26(8):883–888. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200104150-00011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ebara S, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Foster RJ, Mow VC, Weidenbaum M (1996) Tensile properties of nondegenerate human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 21(4):452–461. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199602150-00009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujita Y, Duncan NE, Lotz JC (1997) Radial tensile properties of the lumbar annulus fibrosis are site and degeneration dependent. J Orthop Res 15:814–819. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100150605 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green TP, Adams MA, Dolan P (1993) Tensile properties of the annulus fibrosus. II. Ultimate tensile strength and fatigue life. Eur Spine J 2:209–214. doi: 10.1007/BF00299448 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guiot BH, Fessler RG (2000) Molecular biology of degenerative disc disease. Neurosurgery 47(5):1034–1040. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200011000-00003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heuer F, Schmidt H, Wilke HJ (2008) The relation between intervertebral disc bulging and annular fiber associated strains for simple and complex loading. J Biomech 41(5):1086–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heuer F, Schmitt H, Schmidt H, Wilke H-J (2007) Creep associated changes in intervertebral disc bulging obtained with a laser scanning device. Clin Biomech 22:737–744. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CAJ, Feigl G, Regitnig P (2005) Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 3:125–140. doi: 10.1007/s10237-004-0053-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hongo M, Gay RE, Hsu JT, Zhao KD, Ilharreborde B, Berglund LJ, An KN (2008) Effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles on intervertebral dynamic motion characteristics in the porcine lumbar spine. J Biomech 41(4):916–920. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huyghe JM, Houben GB, Drost MR, van Donkelaar CC (2003) An ionised/non-ionised dual porosity model of intervertebral disc tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2(1):3–19. doi: 10.1007/s10237-002-0023-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huyghe JM, Jongeneelen CJM (2012) 3D non-affine finite strains measured in isolated bovine annulus fibrosus tissue samples. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11:161–170. doi: 10.1007/s10237-011-0300-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jackson AR, Gu W (2009) Transport properties of cartilaginous tissues. Current Rheumatol Rev 5:40–50. doi: 10.2174/157339709787315320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koeller W, Muehlhaus S, Meier W, Hartmann F (1986) Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression—influence of age and degeneration. J Biomech 19(10):807–816. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(86)90131-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McMillan D, Garbutt G, Adams M (1995) Effect of sustained loading on the water content of intervertebral discs: implications for disc metabolism. Ann Rheum Dis 55:880–887. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.12.880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nachemson AL (1960) Lumbar intradiscal pressure: experimental studies on post-mortem material. Acta Orthop Scand 31(Suppl 43):1–104. doi: 10.3109/ort.1960.31.suppl-43.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Panjabi MM, Krag M, Summers D, Videman T (1985) Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens. J Orthop Res 3(3):292–300. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100030305 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pezowicz CA, Robertson PA, Broom ND (2005) Intralamellar relationships within the collagenous architecture of the annulus fibrosus imaged in its fully hydrated state. J Anat 207:299–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00467.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pezowicz CA, Robertson PA, Broom ND (2006) The structural basis of interlamellar cohesion in the intervertebral disc wall. J Anat 208:317–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00536.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Skaggs DL, Weidenbaum M, Iatridis JC, Ratcliffe A, Mow VC (1994) Regional variation in tensile properties and biochemical composition of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 19(12):1310–1319. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199406000-00002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smeathers JE, Joanes DN (1988) Dynamic compressive properties of human lumbar intervertebral joints: a comparison between fresh and thawed specimens. J Biomech 21(5):425–433. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90148-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Szotek S, Szust A, Pezowicz C, Majcher P, Będziński R (2004) Animal models in biomechanical spine investigations. Bull Vet Inst Puławy 48(2):163–168Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thubrikar MJ, Labrosse M, Robicsek F, Al-Soudi J, Fowler B (2001) Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Mech Eng Technol 25(4):133–142. doi: 10.1080/03091900110057806 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsuji H, Hirano N, Ohshima H, Ishihara H, Terahata N, Motoe T (1993) Structural variation of the anterior and posterior annulus fibrosis in the development of human lumbar intervertebral discs: a risk factor for intervertebral disc rupture. Spine 18:204–210. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199302000-00006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Urban JPG, Maroudas A (1981) Swelling of the intervertebral disc in vitro. Connect Tissue Res 9(1):1–10. doi: 10.3109/03008208109160234 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Urban JPG, McMullin JF (1988) Swelling pressure of the lumbar intervertebral discs: influence of age, spinal level, composition and degeneration. Spine 13(2):179–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang Q, Yang YY, Niu HJ, Zhang WJ, Feng QJ, Chen W-F (2013) An ultrasound study of altered hydration behaviour of proteoglycan-degraded articular cartilage. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:289. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-289 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Watanabe A, Benneker LM, Boesch C, Watanabe T, Obata T, Anderson SE (2007) Classification of intervertebral disk degeneration with axial T2 mapping. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:936. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2142 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Witkiewicz W, Gnus J, Hauzer W, Kobielarz M, Będziński R, Szotek S, Kosiński M, Pfanhauser M, Bałasz S (2007) Biomechanical characteristics of the abdominal aortic wall. Acta Angiol 13(3):122–129Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Żak M, Pezowicz C (2013) Spinal segments and regional variations in the mechanical properties of the annulus fibrosus subjected to tensile loading. Acta of Bioeng Biomech 15(1):51–59. doi: 10.5277/abb130107 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhu T, Ai T, Zhang W, Li T, Li X (2015) Segmental quantitative MR imaging analysis of diurnal variation of water content in the lumbar intervertebral discs. Korean J Radiol 16(1):139–145. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.1.139 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Mechatronics and Theory of MechanismsWroclaw University of TechnologyWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations