References
Matamalas A, Bagó J, D’Agata E, Pellisé F (2014) Reliability and validity study of measurements on digital photography to evaluate shoulder balance in idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 9(1):23
Matamalas A, Bagó J, D’Agata E, Pellisé F (2015) Does patient perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical balance? Eur Spine J (Epub ahead of print)
Patias P, Grivas TB, Kapiris A, Aggouris C, Drakoutos E (2010) A review of the trunk surface metrics used as Scoliosis and other deformities evaluation indices. Scoliosis 5:12. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-5-12
Lafage R, Ferrero E, Henry JK, Challier V, Diebo B, Liabaud B, Lafage V, Schwab F (2015) Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters. Spine J 15(12):2493–2502
Guyatte G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40(2):171–178
de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 59(10):1033–1039
Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19(1):231–240
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author do not have any conflict of interest for this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adrover, A.M. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of L. P. Ardigò et al. concerning “Validity and reliability of photographic measures to evaluate waistline asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis” by Matamalas A, Bagó J, D Agata E, Pellisé F (2016) Eur Spine J; 2016 Mar 14 [Epub ahead of print]. Eur Spine J 25, 3019–3020 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4689-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4689-8