Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of pelvic balance, physical activity, and fear-avoidance on the outcome after decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of pelvic balance, physical activity, and fear-avoidance in a cohort of patients undergoing decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Materials and methods

This study includes consecutive patients undergoing decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis by one main surgeon from January 2014 to January 2015. Patients were interviewed by a psychologist and underwent standing whole spine X-ray. Lumbar and pelvic parameters (PI, SS, PT, iPT, LL) were measured by an independent spinal surgeon. Physical activity was measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The “fear-avoidance” was measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Back pain was assessed by the Graphic Rating Scale (GRS). The disability was assessed by the Roland–Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire. Statistical interpretation of the data was performed using SPSS v19 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).

Results

The sample included 51 patients underwent standard posterior laminectomy and instrumented fusion. Surgery has a positive global impact on the perceived low back pain. No significant (Spearman) correlations emerged among pelvic parameters and the pre- and post-surgical GSR. Patients were divided into three groups according to the IPAQ scores after the operation: “inactive” (I), “minimally inactive” (m-I), and “HEPA”. Significant differences emerged between IPAQ and Roland–Morris scores (F(2, 48) = 5.48, p = 0.007): the “inactive” (M(R-M) = 11.3) or “minimally active” (M(R-M) = 9.8) groups scored significantly higher than the “HEPA” group (M(R-M) = 4.7). Tampa scores correlated with gender (rho = −0.408, p = 0.003) and with BMI (rho = −0.369, p = 0.008). Females and obese patients reported higher levels of Tampa scores. Significant relationship was found between Tampa scores and pre-GSR (rho(pre) = 0.250, p = 0.08) and significant with post-surgical GSR (rho(post) = 0.275, p = 0.05) and with post-Roland–Morris score (rho(post) = 0.599, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The fear-avoidance and the physical inactivity are related to the highest levels of low back pain, more than pelvic imbalance. “Inactive” and “fear-avoidant” patients have also the worst outcome after surgery and the worst level of disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H, SPORT Investigators (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358(8):794–810. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0707136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleâs F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(11):1424–1435 (Discussion 1435–1436)

  3. Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B, Sandén B, Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons (2013) Swespine: the Swedish spine register: the 2012 report. Eur Spine J 22(4):953–974. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2758-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S (2015) Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop 39(1):87–95. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2516-6 (Epub 2014 Sep 6)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bayerl SH, Pöhlmann F, Finger T, Onken J, Franke J, Czabanka M, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P (2015) The sagittal balance does not influence the one year clinical outcome of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without obvious instability after microsurgical decompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (Epub ahead of print)

  6. Van Wilgen CP, Dijkstra PU, Versteegen GJ, Fleuren MJ, Stewart R, van Wijhe M (2009) Chronic pain and severe disuse syndrome: long-term outcome of an inpatient multidisciplinary cognitive behavioural programme. J Rehabil Med 41(3):122–128. doi:10.2340/16501977-0292

  7. Leeuw M, Goossens ME, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JW (2007) The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med 30(1):77–94 (Epub 20 Dec 2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ (2000) Fear avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 85:317–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bortz WM 2nd (1984) The disuse syndrome. West J Med 141(5):691–694

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verbunt JA, Seelen HA, Vleayen JW, van de Heijden GJ, Heuts PH, Pons K, Knottnerus JA (2003) Disuse and deconditioning in chronic low back pain: concepts and hypotheses on contributing mechanisms. Eur J Pain 7:9–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF, Hwang SW, Mendel RC, Reitman CA, North American Spine Society (2013) An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J 13(7):734–743. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422 (Epub 23 Sep 2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(2):260–267

    Google Scholar 

  14. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(8):1381–1395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamada M, Kitayuguchi J, Lee IM, Hamano T, Imamura F, Inoue S, Miyachi M, Shiwaku K (2014) Relationship between physical activity and chronic musculoskeletal pain among community-dwelling Japanese adults. J Epidemiol 24(6):474–483 (Epub 26 Jul 2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller RP, Kori S, Todd D (1991) The Tampa Scale: a measure of kinesiophobia. Clin J Pain 7(1):51–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Freyd M (1923) The graphic rating scale. J Educ Psychol 14:83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: Development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(2):145–150

  19. Bener A, Alwash R, Gaber T, Lovasz G (2003) Obesity and low back pain. Coll Antropol. 27(1):95–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Webb R, Brammah T, Lunt M, Urwin M, Allison T, Symmons D (2003) Prevalence and predictors of intense, chronic, and disabling neck and back pain in the UK general population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(11):1195–1202

  21. Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Egan KS, Therneau TM (2000) Lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination in adults with chronic low back pain. Phys Ther 80(3):261–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2024–2029

  23. Sigmundsson FG, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B (2014) Preoperative pain pattern predicts surgical outcome more than type of surgery in patients with central spinal stenosis without concomitant spondylolisthesis: a register study of 9051 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(3):E199–E210. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000101

  24. Donnarumma P, Tarantino R, Nigro L, Rullo M, Messina D, Diacinti D, Delfini R (2016) Decompression versus decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis: analysis of the factors influencing the outcome of back pain and disability. J Spine Surg 2(1):52–58. doi:10.21037/jss.2016.03.07

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Perruchoud C, Buchser E, Johanek LM, Aminian K, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Taylor RS (2014) Assessment of physical activity of patients with chronic pain. Neuromodulation 17:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bize R, Johnson JA, Plotnikoff RC (2007) Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. Prev Med 45:401–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kottke FJ (1966) The effects of limitation of activity upon the human body. JAMA 196(10):825–830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Urban-Baeza A, Zárate-Kalfópulos B, Romero-Vargas S, Obil-Chavarría C, Brenes-Rojas L, Reyes-Sánchez A (2015) Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 22(1):75–79. doi:10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zale EL, Ditre JW (2015) Pain-related fear, disability, and the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain. Curr Opin Psychol 5:24–30

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    P. Donnarumma, R. Tarantino, M. Fragale & R. Delfini

  2. Department of Psychology of Developmental and Socialization Processes, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    F. Presaghi & M. Rullo

Authors
  1. P. Donnarumma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Presaghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Tarantino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Fragale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Rullo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Delfini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Fragale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donnarumma, P., Presaghi, F., Tarantino, R. et al. The impact of pelvic balance, physical activity, and fear-avoidance on the outcome after decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis. Eur Spine J 26, 428–433 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4644-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4644-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation