Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of lower limbs discrepancy and pelvic coronal rotation on pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS) are important parameters in sagittal spine alignment evaluation. The measurements are a projection of the three-dimensional pelvis onto a two-dimensional radiograph and they may be influenced by orientation of the pelvis. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of pelvic rotation in the coronal plane (CPR) on radiographic accuracy of PI, PT, and SS measurements.

Methods

Radiological evaluation of the CPR angel was performed on 1 radiological phantom. The radiographs were taken in 5° CPR increments over a range of 0°–45° (evaluated with a digital protractor). On each of the lateral radiograph, PI, PT, and SS were measured three times by three independent researchers. The lowest CPR that changed PI, PT, or SS by ≥6° (the highest reported error of measurement of these parameters) was considered as unacceptable. Next, CPR was calculated based on the distance between femoral heads (FHD). The agreement of the calculated and measured CPR was quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the median error for a single measurement (SEM), with value 0.75 considered as excellent agreement.

Results

PI, PT and SS could be measured with an acceptable error of 6° on radiographs with up to 20° pelvic rotation. From 20° CPR onwards the S1 endplate was distorted, that makes the measurements of PI, PT and SS questionable. There was an excellent agreement between CPR measured with a protractor and calculated based on FHD with ICC of 0.99 and SEM of 1.1°.

Conclusions

Rotation of the pelvis in the coronal plane during acquisition of radiographs influences PI, PT and SS measurements. Substantial error of PI, PT and SS measurements occurs with CPR of more than 20° which is equivalent to a lower limb discrepancy of 5.2 cm. CPR may be calculated while acquiring the radiograph. Further evaluation of the influence of CPR on spinopelvic parameters with a larger sample would be valuable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehta VA, Amin A, Omeis I, Gokaslan ZL, Gottfried ON (2012) Implications of spinopelvic alignment for the spine surgeon. Neurosurgery 70:707–721. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823262ea

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vrtovec T, Janssen MM, Likar B, Castelein RM, Viergever MA, Pernus F (2012) A review of methods for evaluating the quantitative parameters of sagittal pelvic alignment. Spine J 12:433–446. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Duval-Beaupere G, Schmidt C, Cosson P (1992) A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20:451–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H, Montigny JP, Hecquet J, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G (2002) The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 11:119–125. doi:10.1007/s00586-001-0349-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mangione P, Gomez D, Senegas J (1997) Study of the course of the incidence angle during growth. Eur Spine J 6:163–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tyrakowski M, Wojtera-Tyrakowska D, Siemionow K (2014) Influence of pelvic rotation on pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. Spine 39:E1276–E1283. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tyrakowski M, Yu H, Siemionow K (2014) Pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt measurements using femoral heads or acetabular domes to identify centers of the hips: comparison of two methods. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3739-3

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Streiner DLNG (2008) Health measurement scales—a practical guide to their development and use, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, Hales C (1998) Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 23:1750–1767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Winter RB, Pinto WC (1986) Pelvic obliquity. Its causes and its treatment. Spine 11:225–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brady RJ, Dean JB, Skinner TM, Gross MT (2003) Limb length inequality: clinical implications for assessment and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33:221–234. doi:10.2519/jospt.2003.33.5.221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nissinen M, Heliovaara M, Tallroth K, Poussa M (1989) Trunk asymmetry and scoliosis, anthropometric measurements in prepuberal school children. Acta Paediatr Scand 78:747–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drnach M, Kreger A, Corliss C, Kocher D (2012) Limb length discrepancies among 8- to 12-year-old children who are developing typically. Pediatr Phys Ther 24:334–337. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e3182691c48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mullaji A, Shetty GM, Kanna R, Sharma A (2010) Variability in the range of inter-anterior superior iliac spine distance and its correlation with femoral head centre. A prospective computed tomography study of 200 adults. Skeletal Radiol 39:363–368. doi:10.1007/s00256-009-0791-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wade R, Yang H, McKenna C, Faria R, Gummerson N, Woolacott N (2013) A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system. Eur Spine J 22:296–304. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2469-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 South Wolcott Ave, Room E-270, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA

    Piotr Janusz, Jad Bou Monsef & Kris Siemionow

  2. Department of Spine Disorders and Pediatric Orthopedics, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

    Piotr Janusz

  3. Department of Orthopaedics, Pediatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Konarskiego 13, 05-400, Otwock, Poland

    Marcin Tyrakowski

Authors
  1. Piotr Janusz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcin Tyrakowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jad Bou Monsef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kris Siemionow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piotr Janusz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janusz, P., Tyrakowski, M., Monsef, J.B. et al. Influence of lower limbs discrepancy and pelvic coronal rotation on pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope. Eur Spine J 25, 3622–3629 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4458-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4458-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation