Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 1135–1143 | Cite as

Reliability of the evaluation of posterior ligamentous complex injury in thoracolumbar spine trauma with the use of computed tomography scan

  • Alecio Cristino Evangelista Santos BarcelosEmail author
  • Andrei Fernandes Joaquim
  • Ricardo Vieira Botelho
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The AOSpine thoracolumbar (TL) spine injury classification system is based mainly on computed tomography (CT). The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of CT scan in the diagnosis of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury in thoracolumbar spine trauma (TLST).

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study of 43 patients with TLST. CT scans were evaluated independently by three spine surgeons on two separate occasions, 2 months apart. The reliability of PLC injury parameters was assessed by the Kappa coefficient (κ) and the average percentage of these parameters was established. Injuries were classified according to the AOSpine classification as type A (compression), B (anterior and/or posterior tension band injuries) or C (dislocation) injury and the reliability of the classification was calculated.

Results

On average, PLC injury was identified in 91.4 % of type B or C injuries. Tension band injury and dislocation were found in 90.5 % of type B and 93.2 % of type C injuries. The intraobserver reliability for the PLC injury parameters ranged from 0.518 to 1.000, except for increased interspinous distance (IID). Interobserver reliability ranged from 0.303 to 0.688. When the patients were evaluated as a whole, dislocation showed the highest κ (0.656 and 0.688). When type A or B injuries were assessed, the highest κ were found for IID (0.533 and 0.511) and tension band injury (0.486 and 0.452). The κ for AOSpine classification was 0.526 and 0.645 in both assessments.

Conclusions

In this study, the use of CT scan as the only diagnostic tool could identify PLC injury in most cases and demonstrated satisfactory reliability. Dislocation could satisfactorily diagnose type C injury, while IID was the best parameter to differentiate between type A and B injuries.

Keywords

Spinal fractures Longitudinal ligaments Computed tomography Reliability Posterior ligamentous complex 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Jozemar Santos for his important contribution to the statistical analysis of our data.

Complaince with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Ikeda Y, Nakajima F, Nakajima A, Nakagawa K et al (2013) Failure of conservative treatment for thoracic spine fracture in ankylosing spondylitis: delayed neurological deficit due to spinal epidural hematoma. Mod Rheumatol 23(5):1008–1012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold PM, Bryniarski M (2004) Emergency thoracic diskectomy for the acute onset of paraplegia: report of two cases. J Spinal Cord Med 27(5):481–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Been HD, Poolman RW, Ubags LH (2004) Clinical outcome and radiographic results after surgical treatment of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis following simple type A fractures. Eur Spine J 13(2):101–107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang FC, Lirng JF, Chen SS, Luo CB, Guo WY, Teng MM, Chang CY (2003) Contrast enhancement patterns of acute spinal epidural hematomas: a report of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24(3):366–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahdaleh NS, Viljoen SV, Dalm BD, Howard MA, Grosland NM (2013) Posterior ligamentous complex healing following disruption in thoracolumbar fractures. Med Hypotheses 81:117–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dai LY, Ding WG, Wang XY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD, Xu HZ (2009) Assessment of ligamentous injury in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures using MRI. J Trauma 66:1610–1615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gabriel AC, Angel JP, Juan JG, Luis RM, Hernando RA, Rubén SB (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniovertebr Junct Spine 4(1):25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haba H, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Terae S, Abe S, Yoshikawa H et al (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures. J Neurosurg 99(1 Suppl):20–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrop JS, Vaccaro AR, Hurlbert RJ, Wilsey JT, Baron EM, Shaffrey CI et al (2006) Intrarater and intrarater reliability and validity in the assessment of the mechanism of injury and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex: a novel injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar injuries. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves. March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine 4:118–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holdsworth F (1970) Fractures, dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1534–1551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsieh CT, Chiang YH, Tang CT, Sun JM, Ju DT (2007) Delayed traumatic thoracic spinal epidural hematoma: a case report and literature review. Am J Emerg Med 25(1):69–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB (2006) Designing clinical research, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 37–49Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    James KS, Wenger KH, Schlegel JD, Dunn HK (1994) Biomechanical evaluation of the stability of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:1731–1740Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koh YD, Kim DJ, Koh YW (2010) Reliability and Validity of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS). Asian Spine J. 4:109–117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maynard FM Jr, Bracken MB, Creasey G, Ditunno JF Jr, Donovan WH, Ducker TB et al (1997) International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 35:266–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP (1983) The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:461–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Lasda NA (1982) The unstable burst fracture. Spine 7:365–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McKiernan F, Jensen R (2003) Faciszewski T (2003) The dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18(1):24–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mehta JS, Reed MR, McVie JL, Sanderson PL (2004) Weight-bearing radiographs in thora- columbar fractures: do they influence management? Spine 29(5):564–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meinig H, Döffert J, Linz N, Konerding MA, Gercek E, Pitzen T (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in spinal trauma in 29 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 24(4):864–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Middendorp JJ, Patel AA, Schuetz M, Joaquim AF (2013) The precision, accuracy and validity of detecting posterior ligamentous complex injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a critical appraisal of the literature. Eur Spine J 22:461–474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oner FC, van Gils AP, Faber JA, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (2002) Some complications of common treatment schemes of thoracolumbar spine fractures can be predicted with magnetic resonance imaging: prospective study of 53 patients with 71 fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:629–636Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paleologos TS, Fratzoglou MM, Papadopoulos SS, Chatzidakis EE, Gouliamos AD, Kourousis DD (1998) Posttraumatic spinal cord lesions without skeletal or discal and ligamentous abnormalities: the role of MR imaging. J Spinal Disord 11(4):346–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patel AA, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Anderson DG et al (2007) The adoption of a new classification system: time-dependent variation in interobserver reliability of the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E105–E110Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pizones J, Izquierdo E, Sánchez-Mariscal F, Zuniga L, Álvarez P, Gómez-Rice A (2012) Sequential Damage Assessment of the Different Components of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex After Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation: prospective Study 74 Traumatic Fractures. Spine 37(11):E662–E667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pizones J, Zúniga L, Sánchez-Mariscal F, Álvarez P, Gómez-Rice A, Izquierdo E (2012) MRI study of post-traumatic incompetence of posterior ligamentous complex: importance of the supraspinous ligament. Prospective study of 74 traumatic fractures. Eur Spine J 21:2222–2231CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ratliff J, Anand N, Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Lee JY, Arnold P et al (2007) Regional variability in use of a novel assessment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: United States versus international surgeons. World J Emerg Surg 2:24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rihn JA, Yang N, Fisher C, Saravanja D, Smith H, Morrison WB et al (2010) Using magnetic resonance imaging to accurately assess injury to the posterior ligamentous complex of the spine: a prospective comparison of the surgeon and radiologist. J Neurosurg Spine 12:391–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sadiqi S, Oner FC, Dvorak MF, Aarabi B, Schroeder GC, Vaccaro AR (2015) The influence of spine surgeons’ experience on the classification and intraobserver reliability of the novel AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System—an international study. Spine Publish Ahead of Print. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001042
  31. 31.
    Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Koerner JD, Oner C, Dvorak MF et al (2015) Establishing the injury severity of thoracolumbar trauma: confirmation of the hierarchical structure of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Spine 40(8):E498–E503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schweitzer KM, Vaccaro AR, Harrop JS, Hurlbert J, Carrino JA, Rechtine GR et al (2007) Interrater reliability of identifying indicators of posterior ligamentous complex disruption when plain films are indeterminate in thoracolumbar injuries. J Orthop Sci 12:437–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Toyone T, Tanaka T, Wada Y, Kamikawa K, Ito M, Kimura K et al (2006) Changes in vertebral wedging rate between supine and standing position and its association with back pain: a prospective study in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 31(25):2963–2966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vaccaro AR, Zeiller SC, Hulbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R et al (2005) The Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score: a proposed treatment algorithm. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(3):209–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vaccaro AR, Jeffrey AR, Saravanja D, Anderson DG, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ et al (2009) Injury of the posterior ligamentous complex of the thoracolumbar spine: a prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E841–E847Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C et al (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:2028–2037Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R et al (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2325–2333Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vaccaro AR, Baron EM, Sanfilippo J, Jacoby S, Steuve J, Grossman E et al (2006) Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(11 Suppl):S62–S69 discussion S104Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Watanabe T (2006) Traumatic spinal epidural hematoma without bone disruption. Eur J Pediatr 165(4):278–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Whang PG, Vaccaro AR, Poelstra KA, Patel AA, Anderson DG, Albert TJ et al (2007) The influence of fracture mechanism and morphology on the reliability and validity of two novel thoracolumbar injury classification systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:791–795Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    White AP, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhao JW, Liu Y, Yin RF, Wang JC, Yang YH, Liu P (2013) Ultrasound assessment of injury to the posterior ligamentous complex in patients with mild thoracolumbar fractures. J Int Med Res 41(4):1252–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neurosurgery DivisionHospital Estadual de Emergência e Trauma Senador Humberto Lucena, Avenida EsperançaJoão PessoaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Campinas, Cidade Universitária Zeferino VazCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.Neurosurgery DivisionHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Post-graduation Program in Health Sciences, IAMSPESão PauloBrazil
  5. 5.João PessoaBrazil

Personalised recommendations