Rib-vertebral angle measurements predict brace treatment outcome in Risser grade 0 and premenarchal girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
- 386 Downloads
To investigate the predictive role of rib-vertebral angle (RVA) measurements in early adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) girls with right thoracic curve during brace treatment.
Early AIS (premenarchal and Risser 0) girls who had undergone brace treatment and had been followed regularly were recruited to this study. According to the bracing outcome, they were divided into Group A (non-progressed) and Group B (curve worsened over six degrees or indicated for surgery).
Totally 48 girls were included. There were 30 and 18 patients in Groups A and B, respectively. Ratio of curve progression was significantly higher in patients with initial RVA difference (RVAD) ≥20° versus <20°, or convex RVA (CRVA) ≤68° versus >68°. From brace initiation to the latest follow-up, CRVA was found to be significantly higher in Group A versus Group B (P < 0.05), while RVAD was higher in Group B versus Group A (P < 0.05). Serial measurements revealed an increasing trend for RVAD (from 19 ± 10° to 29 ± 8°) yet a decreasing trend for CRVA (from 68 ± 6° to 60 ± 7°) in Group B, but both RVAD and CRVA were found to remain stable in Group A during the follow-up period. Association analyses showed that both RVAD ≥20° and CRVA ≤68° at brace initiation and at each follow-up were significantly associated with curve progression.
The initial RVAD ≥20° and CRVA ≤68° serve as valid factors in predicting the risk of curve progression during bracing in early AIS. Constant watch on RVAD and CRVA can help to more accurately predict the effectiveness of bracing in these patients.
KeywordsAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis Rib-vertebral angle difference Convex rib-vertebral angle Brace treatment Curve progression
We thank Zhonghui Chen, Xi Chen, and Changzhi Du for their assistance in data analyses.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
This study was performed under the approval from the Ethics Committee of our hospital.
Sources of support
This work was supported by the Development Project of Nanjing Science and Technology Commission and Foundation (Grant No. 201402028), the Key Project of Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Nanjing Department of Health (Grant No. YKK14053), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81301603).
- 3.Guo J, Lam TP, Wong MS, Ng BK, Lee KM, Liu KL, Hung LH, Lau AH, Sin SW, Kwok WK, Yu FW, Qiu Y, Cheng JC (2014) A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria. Eur Spine J 23:2650–2657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Vijvermans V, Fabry G, Nijs J (2004) Factors determining the final outcome of treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the Boston brace: a longitudinal study. J Pediatric Orthop B 13:143–149Google Scholar
- 13.Wiemann JM, Shah SA, Price CT (2014) Nighttime bracing versus observation for early adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatric Orthop 34:603–606Google Scholar
- 17.Canavese F, Holveck J, De Coulon G, Kaelin A (2011) Analysis of concave and convex rib-vertebral angle, angle difference, and angle ratio in patients with lenke type 1 main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by observation, bracing or posterior fusion, and instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:506–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH (2005) Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2068–2075; discussion 2076–2067Google Scholar