Abstract
Purpose
The primary objective of this paper was to provide a systematic review of the available clinical studies of Ti/PEEK combined cages in spinal interbody fusion surgeries, focusing on their radiological and clinical outcomes. A secondary aim was to provide a review and evaluation of the in vitro and preclinical studies reported on Ti/PEEK-coated implants.
Methods
A systematic search of the literature was performed in March 2015 via three databases: Medline, Embase and Cochrane library. The following key search terms were combined with synonyms to identify relevant articles: “spinal fusion,” “PEEK,” “titanium” and “cage.”
Results
The novelty of this intervention translates into a paucity of clinical trials, albeit the results of the seven clinical studies that met the criteria for inclusion are promising. All studies reported rate of fusion as a primary outcome. Two studies reported slightly improved fusion in the experimental Ti/PEEK combination cohort, one study identical fusion (91.7 %) and three studies excellent fusion (96, 100 and 94 %) in the Ti/PEEK cohort, although no differences reached statistical significance.
Conclusions
Clinical studies at this early stage demonstrate that Ti/PEEK implants are safe and efficacious, exhibiting similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes compared to the current standard PEEK. There is clinical evidence substantiating the improved radiographic fusion of Ti/PEEK, albeit the differences were not significant. This field is promising, gaining substantial popularity, and further clinical trials are needed in the future to establish Ti/PEEK cages as a mainstay of clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tsantrizos A, Andreou A, Aebi M, Steffen T (2000) Biomechanical stability of five stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion constructs. Eur Spine J 9(1):14–22
Weiner BK, Fraser RD (1998) Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine 23(5):634–640
Mobbs RJ, Loganathan A, Yeung V, Rao PJ (2013) Indications for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg 5(3):153–163
Mobbs RJ, Chung M, Rao PJ (2013) Bone graft substitutes for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg 5(2):77–85
Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, Sung NY (2011) The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 11(3):205–212
Martin CR, Gruszczynski AT, Braunsfurth HA, Fallatah SM, O’Neil J, Wai EK (2007) The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine 32(16):1791–1798
Rao PJ, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR, Mobbs RJ (2014) Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration. Orthop Surg 6(2):81–89
Lam FC, Alkalay R, Groff MW (2012) The effects of design and positioning of carbon fiber lumbar interbody cages and their subsidence in vertebral bodies. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(2):116–122
Choi JY, Sung KH (2006) Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages. Eur Spine J 15(1):16–22
Mobbs RJ, Chong E, and Rao P (2014) Bioactive Ti/PEEK interbody cage for ACDF: early results. In: Neurosurgical Society of Australasia Annual Scientific Meeting 2014, Perth, Australia
Sagomonyants KB, Jarman-Smith ML, Devine JN, Aronow MS, Gronowicz GA (2008) The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials 29(11):1563–1572
Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28(32):4845–4869
Walsh WR, Bertollo N, Christou C, Schaffner D, Mobbs RJ (2015) Plasma-sprayed titanium coating to polyetheretherketone improves the bone-implant interface. Spine J 15(5):1041–1049
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100
Harris JD, Quatman CE, Manring MM, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2014) How to write a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 42(11):2761–2768
Kotsias A, Mularski S, Cabraja M, Kombos T, Süss O (2013) Fusion characteristics in ACDF with partially titanium coated PEEK cages. Eur Spine J 22(11):2582–2669
Schmitz A, Hoffmeister R, Reimann K, Ertel W (2011) First results of a cervical titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (PEEK)—disc prosthesis. Eur Spine J 20(11):1979–2066
Rickert M, Schreiner S, Rauschmann M (2014) Randomized evaluation of bone ingrowth after intervertebral body fusion with a PEEK and a Titanium coated PEEK TLIF oblique cage. Radiological outcome after 12 months. Eur Spine J 23(11):2473–2569
Süss O, Kühn B, Mularski S (2014) Fusion characteristics in ACDF with titanium-coated carbon fiber enhanced polyetheretherketone cages (tcCF/PEEK). Eur Spine J 23(11):2473–2569
Külling F, Krebs J, Aebli N, Forster T (2013) Radiologic and clinical outcome of TLIF using CF/PEEK cages coated with titanium. Neuroradiology 55:779–800
Schnake K, Weil S, Langheinrich A, Hoffmann CH, Pingel A, Scholz M et al (2013) Randomised clinical and radiological trial comparing PEEK with titanium-coated PEEK-cages for PLIF surgery. Eur Spine J 22(11):2582–2669
Benneker LM, Aksekili M, Seidel U, Haefeli P, Keel M (2014) 2 years experiences with a new Titanium coated radiolucent TLIF cage. Eur Spine J 23(11):2473–2569
Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Neo M, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, Doi K et al (2011) A novel synthetic material for spinal fusion: a prospective clinical trial of porous bioactive titanium metal for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20(9):1486–1495
Ma R, Tang T (2014) Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci 15(4):5426–5445
Diedrich O, Perlick L, Schmitt O, Kraft CN (2001) Radiographic characteristics on conventional radiographs after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparative study between radiotranslucent and radiopaque cages. J Spinal Disord 14(6):522–532
Han CM, Lee EJ, Kim HE, Koh YH, Kim KN, Ha Y et al (2010) The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials 31(13):3465–3470
Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei S (2012) Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomed 7:1215–1225
Schaffarczyk D, Lauweryns P, Willems K (2014) Functionalized PEEK surface for biomimetic spine-fusion-implants: comparison of BIC and BV/TV values of titanium coated and un-coated PEEK implants in an animal model. Eur Spine J 23(11):2473–2569
Portalupi S, von Elm E, Schmucker C, Lang B, Motschall E, Schwarzer G et al (2013) Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics. Syst Rev 2(2):2
Sox H, McNeil B, Eden J, Wheatley B (2008) Knowing What works in health care: a roadmap for the nation. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Scherer RW, Huynh L, Ervin AM, Taylor J, Dickersin K (2013) ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:79
Tumialán LM, Pan J, Rodts GE Jr, Mummaneni PV (2008) The safety and efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone spacer and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2: a review of 200 patients. J Neurosurg 8(6):529–535
Ni J, Zheng Y, Liu N, Wang X, Fang X, Phukan R et al (2015) Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries. Eur Spine J 24(4):791–799
Young JM, Solomon MJ (2009) How to critically appraise an article. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(2):82–91
Geneletti S, Richardson S, Best N (2009) Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case–control studies. Biostatistics 10(1):17–31
Kersten RFMR, van Gaalen SM, de Gast A, Öner FC (2013) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review. Spine J 15(6):1446–1460
Goldstein C, Petis S, Kowalczuk M, Drew B, Petrisor B, Bhandari M (2010) Radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusion: is it confused? Spine J 10(9):S71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Assem, Y., Mobbs, R.J., Pelletier, M.H. et al. Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation. Eur Spine J 26, 593–605 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4353-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4353-8