Skip to main content
Log in

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the relevance of the spinal cord back shift after posterior multilevel decompression. A systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Spinal cord back shift has been considered the desired end point of posterior decompression procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, the association with postoperative outcomes has not been definitively demonstrated. The aim of this review is to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the spinal back shift after posterior decompression to clarify the main controversial aspects and provide recommendations for further studies on the subject.

Methods

A comprehensive quantitative review of the literature was performed. Bibliographic databases were searched using the following keywords: spinal cord drift, spinal cord shift, CSM, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, posterior decompression, laminoplasty, laminectomy and fusion.

Results

Twelve eligible studies were included. The authors measured the spinal cord back shift in different ways, using the posterior edge, the center or the anterior margin of the spinal cord as reference points. Six studies analyzed the correlation between the spinal cord back shift and the recovery rate, but their results were discordant. The correlation between the posterior cord migration and cervical alignment was not confirmed in all studies.

Conclusions

There is a need for a consensus on the best way to measure the spinal cord back shift. The action of multiple factors on spinal cord back shift can explain the difference in the results collected from the studies. We recommend further studies to clarify the behavior of the spinal cord after posterior decompression and its clinical meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med 3:e123–e130

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Azuchi M, Imura S (1996) Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol 243:626–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aita I, Hayashi K, Wadano Y, Yabuki T (1998) Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Brit 80:33–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujimura Y, Nishi Y, Nakamura M (1997) Dorsal shift and expansion of the spinal cord after expansive open-door laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 10:282–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M, Takahashi J, Moriya H (1999) Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine 24:1527–1531 (discussion 1531–1522)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, Yato Y, Ueda S, Mikami Y, Harada T, Ikeda T, Kubo T (2005) Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine 30:2414–2419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shiozaki T, Otsuka H, Nakata Y, Yokoyama T, Takeuchi K, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Toh S (2009) Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 34:274–279. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194e275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xia G, Tian R, Xu T, Li H, Zhang X (2011) Spinal posterior movement after posterior cervical decompression surgery: clinical findings and factors affecting postoperative functional recovery. Orthopedics 34:e911–e918. doi:10.3928/01477447-20111021-03

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JY, Sharan A, Baron EM, Lim MR, Grossman E, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2006) Quantitative prediction of spinal cord drift after cervical laminectomy and arthrodesis. Spine 31:1795–1798. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000225992.26154.d0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tashjian VS, Kohan E, McArthur DL, Holly LT (2009) The relationship between preoperative cervical alignment and postoperative spinal cord drift after decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 72:112–117. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Radcliff KE, Limthongkul W, Kepler CK, Sidhu GD, Anderson DG, Rihn JA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ (2012) Cervical laminectomy width and spinal cord drift are risk factors for postoperative C5 palsy. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31824e53af

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao X, Xue Y, Pan F, Zhao H, Li P, Wang P, Ma X (2012) Extensive laminectomy for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:203–209. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1420-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Du W, Zhang P, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Ding WY, Ren LX (2013) Enlarged laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy associated with kyphosis. Spine J. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.017

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boni MDGL, Denaro V (1987) CT evaluation of the multiple subtotal somatectomy results. In: Kehr P, Weidner A (eds) Cervical spine. Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp 124–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Boni M, Denaro V (1982) Surgical treatment of cervical arthrosis. Follow-up review (2–13 years) of the 1st 100 cases operated on by anterior approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:269–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boni M, Cherubino P, Denaro V, Benazzo F (1984) Multiple subtotal somatectomy. Technique and evaluation of a series of 39 cases. Spine 9:358–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon ST, Raich A, Hashimoto RE, Riew KD, Shaffrey CI, Rhee JM, Tetreault LA, Skelly AC, Fehlings MG (2013) Predictive factors affecting outcome after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 38:S232–S252. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Denaro V (1991) Stenosis of the cervical spine : causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Ranger MR, Irwin GJ, Bunbury KM, Peutrell JM (2008) Changing body position alters the location of the spinal cord within the vertebral canal: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Br J Anaesth 101:804–809. doi:10.1093/bja/aen295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi Y, Narusawa K, Shimizu K, Hijioka A, Nakamura T (2006) Enlargement of cervical spinal cord correlates with improvement of motor function in upper extremities after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:194–198. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000193821.50146.78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsuyama Y, Kawakami N, Mimatsu K (1995) Spinal cord expansion after decompression in cervical myelopathy. Investigation by computed tomography myelography and ultrasonography. Spine 20:1657–1663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Denaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denaro, V., Longo, U.G., Berton, A. et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the relevance of the spinal cord back shift after posterior multilevel decompression. A systematic review. Eur Spine J 24 (Suppl 7), 832–841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4299-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4299-x

Keywords

Navigation