Abstract
Introduction
Although advances have been made in surgical technique and intraoperative monitoring, the rate of postoperative C5 palsy remains the same. We attempt to define characteristics which may predict risk of developing postoperative C5 palsy.
Methods
Retrospective chart review identified 644 patients undergoing cervical procedures. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was performed in 456, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in 78, posterior laminectomy and fusion (PLF) in 106, and posterior open-door laminoplasty in 4 patients. All patients had neurophysiologic monitoring [somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), spontaneous electromyogram (EMG), and/or motor-evoked potential (MEP)].
Results
Postoperative C5 root palsy occurred in 5 (2 with ACCF and 3 with PLF) cases (1.4 %). In all cases, there were no changes in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. C5 palsy did not occur before postoperative day 2.
Conclusions
Patients undergoing cervical decompression remain at risk for C5 root palsy despite use of monitoring. Given that all patients experienced delayed onset of C5 palsy, MEP, SSEP, and EMG may not be sensitive enough to assess the risk of developing C5 palsy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y et al (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2447–2451. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000090833.96168.3F
May DM, Jones SJ, Crockard HA (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in cervical surgery: identification of pre- and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurological deterioration. J Neurosurg 85:566–573. doi:10.3171/jns.1996.85.4.0566
Kelleher MO, Tan G, Sarjeant R, Fehlings MG (2008) Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 8:215–221. doi:10.3171/SPI/2008/8/3/215
Bose B, Sestokas AK, Schwartz DM (2007) Neurophysiological detection of iatrogenic C-5 nerve deficit during anterior cervical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 6:381–385. doi:10.3171/spi.2007.6.5.381
Fan D, Schwartz DM, Vaccaro AR et al (2002) Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2499–2502. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000031313.90883.29
Bhalodia VM, Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Bloomgarden G, Arkins T, Tomak P, Gorelick J, Wijesekera S, Beiner J, Goodrich I (2013) Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 19:395–402
Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Fujiwara Y et al (2006) Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:3013–3017. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000250303.17840.96
Jimenez JC, Sani S, Braverman B et al (2005) Palsies of the fifth cervical nerve root after cervical decompression: prevention using continuous intraoperative electromyography monitoring. J Neurosurg Spine 3:92–97. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0092
Bydon M, Macki M, Kaloostian P et al (2014) Incidence and prognostic factors of c5 palsy: a clinical study of 1001 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 74:595–604. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000322 (discussion 604–605)
Greiner-Perth R, Elsaghir H, Böhm H, El-Meshtawy M (2005) The incidence of C5–C6 radiculopathy as a complication of extensive cervical decompression: own results and review of literature. Neurosu.rg Rev 28:137–142. doi:10.1007/s10143-004-0352-7
Hasegawa K, Homma T, Chiba Y (2007) Upper extremity palsy following cervical decompression surgery results from a transient spinal cord lesion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E197–E202. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000257576.84646.49
Hashimoto M, Mochizuki M, Aiba A et al (2010) C5 palsy following anterior decompression and spinal fusion for cervical degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 19:1702–1710. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1427-5
Stecker M (2012) A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery. Surg Neurol Int 3:174. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.98579
Lawrence BD, Jacobs WB, Norvell DC et al (2013) Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:S173–S182. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eaaf
Komagata M, Nishiyama M, Endo K et al (2004) Prophylaxis of C5 palsy after cervical expansive laminoplasty by bilateral partial foraminotomy. Spine J 4:650–655. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.03.022
Karpova A, Ranganathan A, Davis AM et al (2012) Reliability of quantitative MRI methods in the assessment of spinal canal stenosis and cord compression in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182672307
Nouri A, Tetreault L, Zamorano JJ et al (2015) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:171–178. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000678
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spitz, S., Felbaum, D., Aghdam, N. et al. Delayed postoperative C5 root palsy and the use of neurophysiologic monitoring. Eur Spine J 24, 2866–2871 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4252-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4252-z