Abstract
Introduction
Coupling motions (CMs) are the motions occurring in different directions around the primary motion. As low back pain (LBP) is known to be associated with lumbar CMs, some studies measured lumbar CMs using the microelectromechanical system inertial measurement unit (MEMS-IMU) because of its low cost and small size. This study aimed to examine the reliability of lumbar CM measurements using the MEMS-IMU and to classify the individual characteristics of lumbar CMs.
Methods
MEMS-IMUs were attached to the two lumbar points (L1, L5) of 19 male volunteers (age, 24.3 ± 1.2 years). Following an instructional video and audio recording, they conducted the six lumbar movements three times: flexion and extension, left and right lateral bending, and left and right rotation. The six lumbar movements were repeated after 1 h. Raw data were transformed into angle data using MATLAB. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate intratest repeatability and test–retest reliability. Finally, angle data were analyzed to examine whether individual characteristics of lumbar CMs could be identified.
Results
Lumbar CM measurements showed fair to good or excellent intratest repeatability and test–retest reliability, ranging from 0.669 to 0.997 of the ICCs. All lumbar CMs could be categorized into six types, and flexion and extension CMs were more prominent than other CMs.
Conclusions
Lumbar CM measurements obtained using the MEMS-IMU are reliable, and identifying the individual variations of lumbar CMs may be helpful for alleviating chronic or recurrent LBP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berman BM, Langevin HM, Witt CM, Dubner R (2010) Acupuncture for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med 363:454–461
Sorensen PH, Bendix T, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Lemvigh D, Indahl A (2010) An educational approach based on a non-injury model compared with individual symptom-based physical training in chronic LBP. A pragmatic, randomized trial with a one-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:212–224
Wong WY, Wong MS (2008) Trunk posture monitoring with inertial sensors. Eur Spine J 17:743–753
Capuano-pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, Bracke M, Day R, Pastrick M (1991) Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72(5):338–340
Ishii T, Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H, Fujii R, Nakajima Y et al (2004) Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 29:2826–2831
Gracovetsky S, Newman N, Pawlowsky M, Lanzo V, Davey B, Robinson L (1995) A database for estimating normal spinal motion derived from noninvasive measurements. Spine 20(9):1036–1046
Hindle RJ, Pearcy MJ, Cross AT, Miller DHT (1990) Three dimensional kinematics of the human back. Clin Biomech 5:218–228
Russell P, Pearcy MJ, Unsworth A (1993) Measurement of the range and coupled movements observed in the lumbar spine. Brit J Rheumatol 32:490–497
Van Herp G, Rowe P, Salter P, Paul JP (2000) Three-dimensional lumbar spinal kinematics: a study of range of movement in 100 healthy subjects aged 20 to 60+ years. Rheumatology 39:1337–1340
Lee RYW, Wong TKT (2002) Relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip. Hum Mov Sci 21:481–494
Ha TH, Saber-Sheikh K, Moore AP, Jones MP (2013) Measurement of lumbar spine range of movement and coupled motion using inertial sensors—a protocol validity study. Man Ther 18(1):87–91
Saber-Sheikh K, Bryant EC, Glazzard C, Hamel A, Lee RYW (2010) Feasibility of using inertial sensors to assess human movement. Man Ther 15:122–125
Theobald PS, Jones MD, Williams JM (2012) Do inertial sensors represent a viable method to reliably measure cervical spine range of motion? Man Ther 17:92–96
Kim H, Shin SH, Kim JK, Park YJ, Oh HS, Park YB (2013) Cervical coupling motion characteristics in healthy people using a wireless inertial measurement unit. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013:570428
Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 25(24):3115–3124
Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273
Kim DY, Lee SH, Lee HY, Lee HJ, Chang SB, Chung SK et al (2005) Validation of the Korean version of the Oswestry disability index. Spine 30(5):123–127
Jung JY, Yang YS, Won Y, Kim JJ (2011) Development of wireless ambulatory measurement system based on inertial sensors for gait analysis and its application for diagnosis on elderly people with diabetes mellitus. J Instit Electron Eng 49(2):38–46
Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D et al (2002) ISB recommendation on definition of joint coordinate systema for the reporting of human joint motion—part I; ankle, hip and spine. J Biomech 35(4):543–548
Hof AL, Koerhuis CL, Winters JC (2001) ‘Coupled motions’ in cervical spine rotation can be misleading. Clin Biomech 16(5):455–456
Pinsault N, Vuillerme N (2009) Test-retest reliability of centre of foot pressure measures to assess postural control during unperturbed stance. Med Eng Phys 31(2):146–152
Sahrmann S (2011) Movement system impairment syndromes of the extremities, cervical and thoracic spines. Mosby, St. Louis
Nachemson A, Elfstrom G (1970) Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumbar discs. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl S1:1–40
Gracovetsky S, Farfan HF, Lamy C (1981) The mechanism of the lumbar spine. Spine 6(3):249–262
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no personal or financial conflicts of interest associated with this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yun, WS., Kim, H., Ahn, J.H. et al. Individual characteristics of reliable lumbar coupling motions. Eur Spine J 24, 1917–1925 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4081-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4081-0