Erratum to: Eur Spine J DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-3904-3
Despite thorough review of the manuscript an error has occurred. One of the figures has been interposed somehow. Now the correct Fig. 4 is presented. It is illustrating that the control screwing technique exhibited significant lower load cycles to failure compared to all other groups. The boxplots are showing the median, the 25th and the 75th quartile of the load cycles to failure for the four groups. Statistical significant differences to the control group are marked with an asterisk.
The control screwing technique exhibited significant lower load cycles to failure compared to all other groups. The boxplots are showing the median, the 25th and the 75th quartile of the load cycles to failure for the four groups. Statistical significant differences to the control group are marked with an asterisk
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3904-3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bostelmann, R., Keiler, A., Steiger, H.J. et al. Erratum to: Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading. Eur Spine J 24, 2098 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4001-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4001-3