Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reliability and accuracy of ultrasound measurements with and without the aid of previous radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objectives of this preliminary study were to assess the reliability and accuracy of ultrasound (US) for measuring coronal curvature with and without the aid of a previous radiograph, and to evaluate the ability of US to detect curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.

Methods

Four raters measured 20 AIS US images twice at one-week intervals. Intra-rater reliability and correlation with radiograph were investigated with (rater 1) and without (raters 2–4) the aid of a previous radiograph. The center of lamina (COL) method was used to approximate the Cobb angle.

Results

Thirty-six curves were identified. All raters showed high intra-rater reliability (ICC[2,1] >0.80). With the aid of a previous radiograph, rater 1 showed higher correlation with radiograph (ICC[2,1] = 0.86), better standard error of measurement (SEM = 2.2°), and improved error index of selecting end-vertebrae (EI = 1.34), but no statistical improvement of intra-rater reliability (p > 0.05). For rater 2–4, the range of the ICC[2,1] values between US and radiograph measurements, the SEM value, and the range of the EI values were 0.70°–0.72°, 3.3°, and 1.65°–2.36°, respectively. Specificity and sensitivity of US for detecting curve progression were 0.91 and 0.83, respectively.

Conclusions

Using a previous radiograph as a measurement aid helped the user to measure coronal curvature from US images, and improved the accuracy of end-vertebrae selection. US showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting curve progression, indicating that US may be a suitable, radiation-free alternative for monitoring patients with AIS who have mild or moderate curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Sud A, Athanasios T (2013) Current concepts and controversies on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: part I. Indian J Orthop 47(2):117–128

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the Study of Scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Inst Course Lect 5:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tanure MC, Pinheiro AP, Oliveira AS (2010) Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J 10(9):769–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang J, Lou E, Shi X, Wang Y, Raso JV, Le LH, Lv L (2010) A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(6):383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O’Brien MF (2006) Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31(11):1240–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM (2007) Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J 16(10):1587–1592

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Srinivasalu S, Modi HN, Mehta S, Suh SW, Chen T, Murun T (2008) Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using computer measurement of digitally acquired radiographs-intraobserver and interobserver variability. Asian Spine J 2(2):90–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mok JM, Berven SH, Diab M, Hackbarth M, Hu SS, Deviren V (2008) Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 33(6):681–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine 25(16):2052–2063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ronckers CM, Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Land CE (2008) Multiple diagnostic X-rays for spine deformities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(3):605–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee CF, Fong DY, Cheung KM, Cheng JC, Ng BK, Lam TP, Yip PS, Luk KD (2012) A new risk classification rule for curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 12(11):989–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein SL, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV (1981) Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63(5):702–712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan KJ, Moe MM, Vaithinathan R, Wong HK (2009) Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up study to skeletal maturity. Spine 34(7):697–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM (1984) The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(7):1061–1071

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ, Cooney TE, Finegold DN (2007) Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(1):64–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu H, Ronsky JL, Cheriet F, Harder J, Küpper JC, Zernicke RF (2011) Time series spinal radiographs as prognostic factors for scoliosis and progression of spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 20(1):1512–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li M, Cheng J, Ying M, Zheng YP, Lam TP, Wong WY, Wong MS (2012) Could clinical ultrasound improve the fitting of spinal orthosis for the patients with AIS? Eur Spine J 21(10):1926–1935

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheung CW, Law SY, Zheng YP (2013) Development of 3-D ultrasound system for assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): and system validation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc:6474–6477

  19. Chen W, Lou EH, Zhang PQ, Le LH, Hill D (2013) Reliability of assessing the coronal curvature of children with scoliosis by using ultrasound images. J Child Orthop 7(6):521–529

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Burwell RG, Aujla RK, Cole AA, Kirby AS, Pratt RK, Webb JK, Moulton A (2002) Preliminary study of a new real-time ultrasound method for measuring spinal and rib rotation in preoperative patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 91:262–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Driscoll CR, Aubin CE, Canet F, Labelle H, Dansereau J (2012) Impact of prone surgical positioning on the scoliotic spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(3):173–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Currier DP (1984) Elements of research in physical therapy, 3rd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 160–171

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19(1):231–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ungi T, King F, Kempston M, Keri Z, Lasso A, Mousavi P, Rudan J, Borschneck DP, Fichtinger G (2014) Spinal curvature measurement by tracked ultrasound snapshots. Ultrasound Med Biol 40(2):447–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported through funding provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, 8440 - 112 Street, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada

    Michelle Young, Douglas L. Hill, Rui Zheng & Edmond Lou

  2. Alberta Health Services-Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, AB, T5G 0B7, Canada

    Douglas L. Hill & Edmond Lou

Authors
  1. Michelle Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas L. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edmond Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmond Lou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Young, M., Hill, D.L., Zheng, R. et al. Reliability and accuracy of ultrasound measurements with and without the aid of previous radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Eur Spine J 24, 1427–1433 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3855-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3855-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation