Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring lumbar plexus integrity in extreme lateral transpsoas approaches to the lumbar spine: a new protocol with anatomical bases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

XLIF is an increasingly popular procedure that requires traversing the psoas, with the potential risk of injuring the lumbar plexus nerves. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) is, therefore, critical in this kind of procedures; nevertheless, there were some reports of neural damage.

Purpose

To determine the effectiveness of a new protocol for IOM during XLIF.

Materials and methods

This prospective, nonrandomized, institutional review board-approved study enrolled adult patients of both sexes undergoing XLIF at the Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires between 2012 and 2014. Preoperative and immediate postoperative neurological examinations were carried out, paying special attention to lumbar plexus motor and sensory territories. IOM included EMG and transpsoas stimulation, considering the territories of every motor and sensory branch of the lumbar plexus.

Results

107 patients (133 lumbar levels) were evaluated. Reproducible responses were obtained in the collateral and terminal branches of the lumbar plexus, which were well preserved. No patient (0 %) had new motor postoperative deficits. Nineteen (17.75 %) patients had minor and transient sensory symptoms, lasting less than a month. One patient (0.93 %) had longer duration of sensory complaints (3 months).

Conclusion

A detailed IOM of lumbar plexus branches can determine in real time the proximity of intrapsoas nerves during XLIF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA (2010) Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine 35:S355–S360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine 35(suppl 26):S302–S331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6(4):435–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodgers WB, Lehmen JA, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA (2012) Grade 2 spondylolisthesis at L4–5 treated by XLIF: safety and midterm results in the “worst case scenario”. ScientificWorldJournal 356712:7. doi:10.1100/2012/356712

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sutter M, Deletis V, Dvorak J et al (2007) Current opinions and recommendations on multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 2):S232–S237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sutter M, Eggspuehler A, Grob D et al (2007) The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1017 patients. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 2):S162–S170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sutter M, Eggspuehler A, Muller A et al (2007) Multimodal intraoperative monitoring: an overview and proposal of methodology based on 1017 cases. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 2):S153–S161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clements DH, Morledge DE, Martin WH et al (1996) Evoked and spontaneous electromyography to evaluate lumbosacral pedicle screw placement. Spine 21:600–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deletis V (2007) Basic methodological principles of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries. Eur Spine J 16(suppl 2):S147–S152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sutter MA, Eggspuehler A, Grob D, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Dvorak J (2007) Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during 409 lumbosacral surgical procedures in 409 patients. Eur Spine J 16(suppl 2):S221–S228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uribe JS, Vale FL, Dakwar E (2010) Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine 35(26S):S368–S374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bindal RK, Ghosh S (2007) Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 6:126–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tohmeh AG, Rodgers WB, Peterson MD (2011) Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach: clinical article. J Neurosurg 14(1):31–37

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moro T, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Yaginuma H (2003) An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Spine 28:423–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL (2010) Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 13(2):260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dakwar E, Vale FL, Uribe JS (2011) Trajectory of the main sensory and motor branches of the lumbar plexus outside the psoas muscle related to the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 14:290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kepler CK, Bogner EA, Herzog RJ, Huang RC (2011) Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20(4):550–556

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park DK, Lee MJ, Lin EL, Singh K, An HS, Phillips FM (2010) The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: anatomic study. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(4):223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, Lee YP, Garfin S et al (2009) Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine 34(12):1330–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Banagan K, Gelb D et al (2011) Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study. Spine 36:E687–E691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian AR, Abel N, Dakwar E, Uribe JS (2013) Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization. A review. J Neurosurg Spine 18:289–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Galloway GM (2011) Direct lateral transpsoas approach to interbody fusion—may be risky after all. J Clin Neurophysiol 28:605–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Ajmi A, Rousseff RT, Khuraibet AJ (2010) Iatrogenic femoral neuropathy: two cases and literature update. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 12:66–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cahill KS, Martinez JL, Wang MY, Vanni S, Levi AD (2012) Motor nerve injuries following the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 17(3):227–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cummock MD, Vanni S, Levi AD, Yu Y, Wang MY (2011) An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS (2010) Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dakwar E, Le TV, Baaj AA, Le AX, Smith WD, Akbarnia BA et al (2011) Abdominal wall paresis as a complication of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tonetti J, Vouaillat H, Kwon B, Selek L, Guigard S, Merloz P et al (2006) Femoral nerve palsy following mini-open extraperitoneal lumbar approach: report of three cases and cadaveric mechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Knight RQ, Schwaegler P, Hanscom D, Roh J (2009) Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:34–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Samudrala S, Khoo LT, Rhim SC, Fessler RG (1999) Complications during anterior surgery of the lumbar spine: an anatomically based study and review. Neurosurg Focus 7:e9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Houten JK, Alexandre LC, Nasser R, Wollowick AL (2011) Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion—report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 15:280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, Rodgers WB, Phillips FM (2010) A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26 Suppl):S322–S330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moller DJ, Slimack NP, Acosta FL Jr, Koski TR, Fessler RG, Liu JC (2011) Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariana Bendersky.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bendersky, M., Solá, C., Muntadas, J. et al. Monitoring lumbar plexus integrity in extreme lateral transpsoas approaches to the lumbar spine: a new protocol with anatomical bases. Eur Spine J 24, 1051–1057 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3801-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3801-9

Keywords

Navigation