Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of multimodal spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery: a single centre experience of 354 operations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring in the early detection of impending spinal cord injury during surgery for spinal deformity.

Method

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data in 354 consecutive spinal deformity operations from June 2003 to October 2013. Patients were sub-grouped according to demographics, diagnosis and operative features. Post-operative neurological deficit was defined as either spinal cord, nerve root or transient deficit.

Results

Combined monitoring with SSEPs and MEPs was possible in 315 cases. The overall incidence of significant alerts was 7.1 % and overall permanent neurological deficit was 1.6 %. When results were collated, the overall combined sensitivity of multimodal monitoring was 100 % with a specificity of 99.3 %.

Conclusions

Multimodal monitoring allows early detection of impending neurological deficit that is superior to a single monitoring modality. To achieve optimal use of monitoring, continuous communication between surgical, anaesthetic and neurophysiology teams are required. As a result of our experience we have incorporated in our consent procedure the discussion of monitoring and the possibility of needing to abandon the procedure, and completing in a staged fashion at a later date. We believe multimodal monitoring is the current gold standard for complex spinal deformity surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (1998) Major intraoperative neurologic deficits in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients: incidence and etiology at one institution. Spine 23:324–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, Flynn J, Drummond DS, Bowe JA, Laufer S, Shah SA, Bowen JR, Pizzutillo PD, Jones KJ, Drummond DS (2007) Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2440–2449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Noonan KJ, Walker T, Feinberg JR, Nagel M, Didelot W, Lindseth R (2002) Factors related to false- versus true-positive neuromonitoring changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 27:825–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, Mehdian SM, Webb JK, Blumhardt LD (2002) Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1082–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine 35:S37–S46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Plasmati R, Michelucci R, Greggi T, Morigi A, Bacchin MR, Bonarelli S, Cioni A, Vommaro F, Fini N, Lolli F, Parisini P (2011) The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring. Eur Spine J 20:S105–S114. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1756-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Infants, Children and Young people with Spinal Deformity in the UK. Recommended standards of care for patients with spinal deformity. British Scoliosis Society. www.britscoliosissoc.org.uk/content/assets/1553-4.doc. Accessed 02 Jan 2015

  8. SRS Information Statement (2009) Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during spinal deformity surgery. Scoliosis Research Society. https://www.srs.org/professionals/education_materials/graphics/Neuromonitoring_Information_statement_2-6-09.doc. Accessed 02 Jan 2015

  9. ANS/BSCN Guidelines for Neurophysiological Recordings of the Spinal Cord during Corrective Spinal Deformity Surgery 2013. British Society for Clinical Neurophysiology. http://www.bscn.org.uk/content.aspx?Group=guidelines&Page=guidelines_IOM. Accessed 02 Jan 2015

  10. Nash CL, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, Brown RH (1977) Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop 126:100–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deletis V (1993) Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways. In: Devinsky O, Beric A, Dogali M (eds) Advances in neurology: electrical and magnetic stimualtion of the brain. Raven, New York, pp 201–214

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sloan TB, Heyer EJ (2002) Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:430–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MacDonald DB (2001) Individually optimizing posterior tibial somatosensory evoked potential P37 scalp derivations for intraoperative monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 18:364–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. A Survey of Spinal Intraoperative Monitoring (IOM) Provided by NHS Hospitals in the UK. Mullins G, Grover HJ, Rai A, Blake JC. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. http://www.bscn.org.uk/data/files/Abstracts/Abstracts%20March%202010.pdf. Accessed on 02 Jan 2015

  15. Lesser RP, Raudzens P, Luders H, Nuwer MR, Goldie WD, Morris HH, Dinner DS, Klem G, Hahn JF, Shetter AG, Ginsburg HH, Gurd AR (1986) Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 19:22–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson G, Kanim LEA, Sherman JE (1995) Somatosensoryevoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96:6–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morris SAC, Marriott H, Walsh P, Kane N, Harding IJ, Hutchinson J, Nelson I (2014) The use of intra-operative monitoring during spinal deformity surgery. Bone Joint J 96-B:29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Durst.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhagat, S., Durst, A., Grover, H. et al. An evaluation of multimodal spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery: a single centre experience of 354 operations. Eur Spine J 24, 1399–1407 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3766-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3766-8

Keywords

Navigation