Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Complications, secondary interventions and long term morbidity after en bloc sacrectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

En bloc sacrectomy is a demanding surgical procedure to remove tumors from the sacrum. Comprehensive data on readmissions for complications endured months to years after initial discharge are scant. The purpose of this study is to present the long-term complications, readmissions and secondary interventions for patients having undergone en bloc sacrectomy.

Methods

Patients were included if en bloc sacrectomy and follow-up were conducted in the authors institution. Correspondence from all specialties involved in the treatment of patients was retrieved. Predefined parameters were scored and assigned to five distinct phases: diagnostic phase; surgery; postoperative period to 1 year after surgery; second year after surgery until follow-up and last follow-up.

Results

Sixteen patients underwent anterior–posterior en bloc sacrectomy for a locally aggressive tumor (n = 2); malignant tumor (n = 13) or solitary metastasis (n = 1). The type of resection was low (n = 1); middle (n = 3); high (n = 4); total (n = 3) and hemisacrectomy (n = 5). The median surgical duration was 12.7 h and median blood lost was 12 l. A total of 73 major complications (average per patient 5; median 4; range 0–12) were recorded and 73 secondary interventions (average per patient 5; median 5; range 0–11) were performed in the first year postsurgery. From the second year until follow-up complications and secondary interventions markedly decreased. At final follow-up (65–266 months), considerable morbidity was found for the eleven patients still alive.

Conclusions

En bloc sacrectomy is a procedure with a high rate of major complications, regardless of tumor histology, often necessitating readmissions and secondary interventions. Long-term survival is associated with considerable morbidity and extensive preoperative counseling should be conducted to discuss the risks and outcome of the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puri A, Agarwal MG, Shah M, Srinivas CH, Shukla PJ, Shrikhande SV, Jambhekar NA (2009) Decision making in primary sacral tumors. Spine J 9:396–403. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hsieh PC, Xu R, Sciubba DM, McGirt MJ, Nelson C, Witham TF, Wolinksy JP, Gokaslan ZL (2009) Long-term clinical outcomes following en bloc resections for sacral chordomas and chondrosarcomas: a series of twenty consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2233–2239. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b61b90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo Y, Palmer JL, Shen L, Kaur G, Willey J, Zhang T, Bruera E, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL (2005) Bowel and bladder continence, wound healing, and functional outcomes in patients who underwent sacrectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 3:106–110. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fourney DR, Rhines LD, Hentschel SJ, Skibber JM, Wolinsky JP, Weber KL, Suki D, Gallia GL, Garonzik I, Gokaslan ZL (2005) En bloc resection of primary sacral tumors: classification of surgical approaches and outcome. J Neurosurg Spine 3:111–122. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sherman CE, Rose PS, Pierce LL, Yaszemski MJ, Sim FH (2012) Prospective assessment of patient morbidity from prone sacral positioning. J Neurosurg Spine 16:51–56. doi:10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hulen CA, Temple HT, Fox WP, Sama AA, Green BA, Eismont FJ (2006) Oncologic and functional outcome following sacrectomy for sacral chordoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1532–1539. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruggieri P, Angelini A, Ussia G, Montalti M, Mercuri M (2010) Surgical margins and local control in resection of sacral chordomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2939–2947. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1472-8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miles WK, Chang DW, Kroll SS, Miller MJ, Langstein HN, Reece GP, Evans GR, Robb GL (2000) Reconstruction of large sacral defects following total sacrectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2387–2394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Street JT, Lenehan BJ, DiPaola CP, Boyd MD, Kwon BK, Paquette SJ, Dvorak MF, Rampersaud YR, Fisher CG (2012) Morbidity and mortality of major adult spinal surgery. A prospective cohort analysis of 942 consecutive patients. Spine J 12:22–34. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pull ter Gunne AF, Cohen DB (2009) Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1422–1428. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a03013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen KW, Yang HL, Lu J, Wang GL, Ji YM, Bao ZH, Wu GZ, Gu Y, Sun ZY, Zhu RF (2011) Risk factors for postoperative wound infections of sacral chordoma after surgical excision. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:230–234. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181ea478a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Olsen MA, Mayfield J, Lauryssen C, Polish LB, Jones M, Vest J, Fraser VJ (2003) Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg 98:149–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdul-Jabbar A, Takemoto S, Weber MH, Hu SS, Mummaneni PV, Deviren V, Ames CP, Chou D, Weinstein PR, Burch S, Berven SH (2012) Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: description of surgical and patient-based risk factors for postoperative infection using administrative claims data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1340–1345. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318246a53a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guest JD, Vanni S, Silbert L (2004) Mild hypothermia, blood loss and complications in elective spinal surgery. Spine J 4:130–137. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedrick TL, Sawyer RG, Friel CM, Stukenborg GJ (2013) A method for estimating the risk of surgical site infection in patients with abdominal colorectal procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 56:627–637. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318279a93e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sciubba DM, Nelson C, Gok B, McGirt MJ, McLoughlin GS, Noggle JC, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Bydon A, Gokaslan ZL (2008) Evaluation of factors associated with postoperative infection following sacral tumor resection. J Neurosurg Spine 9:593–599. doi:10.3171/SPI.2008.9.0861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Varga PP, Bors I, Lazary A (2009) Sacral tumors and management. Orthop Clin North Am 40:105–123. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2008.09.010 vii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruggieri P, Angelini A, Pala E, Mercuri M (2012) Infections in surgery of primary tumors of the sacrum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:420–428. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182213a44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwab JH, Healey JH, Rose P, Casas-Ganem J, Boland PJ (2009) The surgical management of sacral chordomas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2700–2704. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bad11d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scaltriti S, Cencetti S, Rovesti S, Marchesi I, Bargellini A, Borella P (2007) Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres. J Hosp Infect 66:320–326. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Panahi P, Stroh M, Casper DS, Parvizi J, Austin MS (2012) Operating room traffic is a major concern during total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2690–2694. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2252-4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Garvey PB, Clemens MW, Rhines LD, Sacks JM (2013) Vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flow-through flap to a free fibula flap for total sacrectomy reconstruction. Microsurgery 33:32–38. doi:10.1002/micr.21990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Creagh TA, Dixon L, Frizelle FA (2012) Reconstruction with Vertical Rectus Abdominus Myocutaneous flap in advanced pelvic malignancy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:791–797. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.11.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Glatt BS, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Boland P, Cordeiro PG (2006) Reconstruction of extensive partial or total sacrectomy defects with a transabdominal vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 56:526–530. doi:10.1097/01.sap.0000205772.15061.39 discussion 530–1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kerneis S, Shields C, Touboul E, Chaouat M, Tiret E (2009) Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg 250:707–711. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bce334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Clarke MJ, Dasenbrock H, Bydon A, Sciubba DM, McGirt MJ, Hsieh PC, Yassari R, Gokaslan ZL, Wolinsky JP (2012) Posterior-only approach for en bloc sacrectomy: clinical outcomes in 36 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 71:357–364. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31825d01d4 discussion 364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Angelini A, Ruggieri P (2013) A new surgical technique (modified Osaka technique) of sacral resection by posterior-only approach: description and preliminary results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E185–E192. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827db1ba

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boriani S, Bandiera S, Biagini R, Bacchini P, Boriani L, Cappuccio M, Chevalley F, Gasbarrini A, Picci P, Weinstein JN (2006) Chordoma of the mobile spine: fifty years of experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:493–503. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000200038.30869.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li D, Guo W, Qu H, Yang R, Tang X, Yan T, Tang S, Yang Y, Ji T, Dong S (2013) Experience with wound complications after surgery for sacral tumors. Eur Spine J 22:2069–2076. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2765-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. El-Masri WS, Chong T, Kyriakider AE, Wang D (2012) Long-term follow-up study of outcomes of bladder management in spinal cord injury patients under the care of the Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries in Oswestry. Spinal Cord 50:14–21. doi:10.1038/sc.2011.78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hackler RH, Hall MK, Zampieri TA (1989) Bladder hypocompliance in the spinal cord injury population. J Urol 141:1390–1393

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dauty M, Perrouin Verbe B, Maugars Y, Dubois C, Mathe JF (2000) Supralesional and sublesional bone mineral density in spinal cord-injured patients. Bone 27:305–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Edwards WB, Schnitzer TJ, Troy KL (2013) Bone mineral loss at the proximal femur in acute spinal cord injury. Osteoporos Int 24:2461–2469. doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2323-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sternheim A, Saidi K, Lochab J, O’Donnell PW, Eward WC, Griffin A, Wunder JS, Ferguson P (2013) Internal fixation of radiation-induced pathological fractures of the femur has a high rate of failure. Bone Joint J 95-B:1144–1148. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.31832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Davidge KM, Eskicioglu C, Lipa J, Ferguson P, Swallow CJ, Wright FC (2010) Qualitative assessment of patient experiences following sacrectomy. J Surg Oncol 101:447–450. doi:10.1002/jso.21517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Park L, Delaney TF, Liebsch NJ, Hornicek FJ, Goldberg S, Mankin H, Rosenberg AE, Rosenthal DI, Suit HD (2006) Sacral chordomas: impact of high-dose proton/photon-beam radiation therapy combined with or without surgery for primary versus recurrent tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:1514–1521 S0360-3016(06)00409-3 [pii]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    J. J. Verlaan, J. S. Kuperus & F. C. Oner

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    W. B. Slooff

  3. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    A. Hennipman

Authors
  1. J. J. Verlaan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. S. Kuperus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. B. Slooff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Hennipman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. C. Oner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Verlaan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verlaan, J.J., Kuperus, J.S., Slooff, W.B. et al. Complications, secondary interventions and long term morbidity after en bloc sacrectomy. Eur Spine J 24, 2209–2219 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3729-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3729-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation