Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in spinal trauma in 29 consecutive patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Indication for surgery in spine trauma patients depends on the extent of destruction of the spine. Computer-assisted tomography scan (CAT scan) is not suitable to diagnose type B-injuries. Aim of the study was to investigate whether ultrasound is able to detect destruction of the posterior ligament complex (PLC).

Methods

Twenty-nine patients were included. The results of ultrasound were compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CAT scan, X-ray, intraoperative findings. Statistical analysis was carried out by an independent observer.

Results

In 27 cases both ultrasound and MRI had the same result. In two cases, ultrasound failed to detect ligamentous injury. The sensitivity of ultrasound was 0.82 (CI 0.48–0.98), its specificity: 1. MRI and Ultrasound findings had a strong positive correlation (phi = 0.85, Cohen’s kappa: 0.85, with 95 % confidence interval 0.65–1) and a high significance (Fischer’s exact test: p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Ultrasound may indicate rupture or integrity of PLC in cases where MRI is missing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borges BCR, Wieczoreck P, Balki M, Carvalho JCA (2009) Sonoanatomy of the lumbar spine of pregnant women at term. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34:581–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chin KJ, Chan WS, Ramlogan R, Perlas A (2010) Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with a challenging spinal anatomy: two case reports. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54:252–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Graf R (2000) Taktisches Vorgehen in der sonographischen Praxis, Standardebene und Brauchbarkeitsprüfung. In: Graf R (ed) Sonographie der Säuglingshüfte und therapeutische Konsequenzen–Ein Kompendium. Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Hillmann R, Döffert J (2009) Lumbale und thorakale Periduralanästhesie. In: Hillmann (ed) Praxis der anästhesiologischen Sonografie–Interventionelle Verfahren bei Erwachsenen und Kindern. Elsevier Urban & Fischer

  5. Kirchmair L, Entner T, Wissel J, Moriggl B, Kapral S, Mitterschiffthaler G (2001) A study of the paravertebral anatomy for ultrasound-guided posterior lumbar plexus block. Anesth Analg 93:477–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moon SH, Park MS, Suk KS et al (2002) Feasibility of ultrasound examination in posterior ligament complex injury of thoracolumbar spine fracture. Spine 27:2154–2158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mueller LA, Degreif J, Schmidt R, Pfander D, Forst R, Rommens PM, Mueller LP, Rudig L (2006) Ultrasound-guided spinal fracture repositioning, ligamentotaxis, and remodeling after thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 31:E739–E746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oner FC, van Gils AP, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (1999) MRI findings of thoracolumbar spine fractures: a categorisation based on MRI examinations of 100 fractures. Skeletal Radiol 8:433–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perlas A (2010) Evidence for the use of ultrasound in neuraxial blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med 35:S43–S46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Petersilge CA, Pathria MN, Emery SE, Masaryk TJ (1995) Thoracolumbar burst fractures: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 194:49–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Renes SH, Bruhn J, Gielen MJ, Scheffer GJ, van Geffen GJ (2010) In-plane ultrasound-Guided thoracic paravertebral block a preliminary report of 36 cases with radiologic confirmation of catheter position. Reg Anesth Pain Med 35:212–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rommens PM (2008) Vademecum der Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie der Universität Mainz 62–67

  14. Schnake KJ, von Scotti F, Haas NP, Kandziora F (2008) Typ-B-Distraktionsverletzungen der thorakolumbalen Wirbelsäule—Fehleinschätzungen des posterioren Ligamentkomplexes bei der radiologischen Diagnostik. Unfallchirurg 111:977–984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Von Scotti F, Schröder RJ, Streitparth F, Kandziora F, Hoffmann R, Schnake KJ (2010) Ultrasound examination of the posterior ligament complex in thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Radiologe 50(12):1132, 1134–1140

  16. Vordemvenne T, Hartensuer R, Löhrer L, Vieth V, Fuchs T, Raschke MJ (2009) Is there a way to diagnose spinal instability in acute burst fractures by performing ultrasound? Eur Spine J 18:964–971

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Meinig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meinig, H., Döffert, J., Linz, N. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in spinal trauma in 29 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 24, 864–870 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3596-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3596-0

Keywords

Navigation