Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of lordosis angle change after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion on sacrum angular displacement: a finite element study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess and characterize the sacrum angular displacements in response to lumbar lordosis after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion.

Methods

A finite element model of the lower lumbar spine-pelvis was established and used to simulate the posterior fusion at L3–L5 and L4–S1. The lordosis angle in the fusion segments was set to five different conditions with respect to the intact model: 10° less than intact, 5° less than intact, same as intact, 5° more than intact, and 10° more than intact. Variations of the sacrum angular displacements with lordosis changes were analyzed under loading setting of axial compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

Results

Compared with the intact lordosis, both increased and decreased lumbar lordosis angles caused the sacrum angular displacements to be increased. The lordosis angle increased by 10° induced the most substantial increase in sacrum angular displacements. In addition, the sacrum angular displacements of the L4–S1 fusion model at different lordosis angles were higher than those of the L3–L5 fusion model.

Conclusion

The sacrum angular displacements occur as a result of the fusion surgery (L4–S1) and the changes in lumbar lordosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshihara H (2012) Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: current knowledge. Eur Spine J 21(9):1788–1796

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ha K-Y, Lee J-S, Kim K-W (2008) Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up. Spine 33(11):1192–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ivanov AA, Kiapour A, Ebraheim NA, Goel V (2009) Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study. Spine 34(5):E162–E169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson MD, Nelson LM, McManus AC, Jackson RP (1995) The effect of operative position on lumbar lordosis: a radiographic study of patients under anesthesia in the prone and 90-90 positions. Spine 20(12):1419–1424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gödde S, Fritsch E, Dienst M, Kohn D (2003) Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 28(15):1693–1699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Keorochana G, Taghavi CE, Lee K-B, Yoo JH, Liao J-C, Fei Z, Wang JC (2011) Effect of sagittal alignment on kinematic changes and degree of disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: an analysis using positional MRI. Spine 36(11):893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Vrbos LA, Knight GW, Miyano S, Kirincic M, Kaneda K, Lorenz MA (2000) The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25(13):1617–1624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ivanov A, Kiapour A, Ebraheim N, Goel V (2007) Finite element modeling and analysis of human pelvis. In: Conference of Bioengineering Division of American Society of Mechanical Engineering

  9. Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel TC, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S, Matyas A, Cowgill I, Shaw M, Long R (2005) Effects of charite artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine 30(24):2755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weisl H (1954) The ligaments of the sacro-iliac joint examined with particular reference to their function. Cells Tissues Organs 20(3):201–213

  11. Eichenseer PH, Sybert DR, Cotton JR (2011) A finite element analysis of sacroiliac joint ligaments in response to different loading conditions. Spine 36(22):E1446–E1452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalstra M, Huiskes R, Van Erning L (1995) Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. J Biomech Eng 117(3):272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goel V, Monroe B, Gilbertson L, Brinckmann P (1995) Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc: finite element analysis of the L3–L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads. Spine 20(6):689–698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goel VK, Ramirez SA, Kong W, Gilbertson LG (1995) Cancellous bone Young’s modulus variation within the vertebral body of a ligamentous lumbar spine–application of bone adaptive remodeling concepts. J Biomech Eng 117(3):266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen C-S, Cheng C-K, Liu C-L (2002) A biomechanical comparison of posterolateral fusion and posterior fusion in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 15(1):53–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller JA, Schultz AB, Andersson GB (1987) Load-displacement behavior of sacroiliac joints. J Orthop Res 5(1):92–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia J, Doblare M, Seral B, Seral F, Palanca D, Gracia L (2000) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of several internal and external pelvis fixations. J Biomech Eng 122(5):516–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec J-C (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 20(5):626–633

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec J-C, D’Acunzi G, Perrin G (2013) Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 22(6):834–841

  20. Jang J-S, Lee S-H, Min J-H, Maeng DH (2007) Changes in sagittal alignment after restoration of lower lumbar lordosis in patients with degenerative flat back syndrome. J Neurosurg Spine 7(4):387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Yoon ST, Minamide A, Kim KS, Tomita K, Hutton WC (2003) Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28(14):1560–1566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Untch C, Liu Q, Hart R (2004) Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum. Spine 29(21):2376–2381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is a key project of medicine supported by Shanghai science and technology committee “The research of biomechanics simulation and new medical equipment for lumbar degenerative diseases” (12411950900) and the guidance fund for medicine of Shanghai science and technology committee “The research of etiology and therapeutic strategy for sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar spinal fusion” (114119a2900).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no any conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhicai Shi or Ming Li.

Additional information

N. Mao and J. Shi should be regarded as co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, N., Shi, J., He, D. et al. Effect of lordosis angle change after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion on sacrum angular displacement: a finite element study. Eur Spine J 23, 2369–2374 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3569-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3569-3

Keywords

Navigation