Skip to main content
Log in

Altered head orientation patterns in children with idiopathic scoliosis in conditions with sensory conflict

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is the most common spinal deformity in adolescents. Defective postural equilibrium may be a contributing factor. The information of the three sensory systems combined enables the formation of a central representation of head position and body posture. Comparison of head angles of girls with and without scoliosis may result in a difference in head orientation.

Methods

25 girls with IS and 16 girls without scoliosis (NS) between the age of 10–16 years stand in a special constructed box on a roll-tilting platform (tilt −14° to +14°).

Results

NS and IS subjects behave quite similarly if there is no sensory conflict, but if there is conflict, the differences between the two groups are greater, especially within the 13- to 14-year-old category.

Conclusions

The differences between groups for different age categories suggest that the process of development of sensory integration for estimation of verticality appears to be different for girls with scoliosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simoneau M, Mercier P, Blouin J, Allard P, Teasdale N (2006) Altered sensory-weighting mechanisms is observed in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Neurosci 7:68–76

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chockalingam N, Cochrane T, Ahmed E, Dangerfield P, Rahmatalla A (2004) Assessment of ground reaction force during scoliotic gait. Eur Spine J 13(8):750–754

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. LeBlanc R, Rivard C, Poitras B, Labelle H (1997) Relation between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and morphologic somatotypes. Spine 22(21):2532–2536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lopez C, Bachofner C, Mercier M, Blanke O (2009) Gravity and observer’s body orientation influence the visual perception of human body postures. J Vis 9(5):1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnett-Cowan M, Harris LR (2008) Perceived self-orientation in allocentric and egocentric space: effects of visual and physical tilt on saccadic and tactile measures. Brain Res 1242:231–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarnutzer AA, Bockisch C, Straumann D, Olasagasti I (2009) Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability. J Neurophysiol 102(3):1657–1671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Asch SE, Witkin HA (1948) Studies in Space Orientation II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. J Exp Psychol 38(4):455–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt T, Dieterich M (1999) The vestibular cortex. Its locations, functions, and disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci 871:293–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung J, Sluiter WJ, Veldhuizen AG, Cool JC, van Horn JR (2002) Perception of vertical and horizontal orientation in children with scoliosis. J Orthop Res 20(3):416–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahlstrand T, Ortengren R, Nachemson A (1978) Postural equilibrium in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 49(4):354–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herman R, Mixon J, Fisher A, Maulucci R, Stuyck J (1985) Idiopathic scoliosis and the central nervous system: a motor control problem. The Harrington lecture, 1983. Scoliosis Research Society. Spine 10(1):1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simoneau M, Lamothe V, Hutin E, Mercier P, Teasdale N, Blouin J (2009) Evidence for cognitive vestibular integration impairment in idiopathic scoliosis patients. BMC Neurosci 10:102–108

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahlstrand T, Petruson B (1979) A study of labyrinthine function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 50(6):759–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambert FM, Malinvaud D, Glaunès J, Bergot C, Straka H, Vidal PP (2009) Vestibular asymmetry as the cause of idiopathic scoliosis, A possible answer from Xenopus. J Neurosci 29(40):12477–12483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiener-Vacher SR, Mazda K (1998) Asymmetric otolith vestibular–ocular responses in children with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr 132(3):1028–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wyatt M, Barrack R, Mubarak S, Whitecloud T, Burke S (1986) Vibratory response in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(5):714–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barrack RL, Wyatt MP, Whitecloud TS 3rd, Burke SW, Roberts JM, Brinker MR (1988) Vibratory hypersensitivity in idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 8(4):389–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McInnes E, Hill DL, Raso VJ, Chetner B, Greenhill BJ, Moreaum MJ (1991) Vibratory response in adolescents who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(8):1208–1212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirabayashi S, Iwasaki Y (1995) Developmental perspective of sensory organization on postural control. Brain Dev 17(2):111–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanahashi S, Ujike H, Kozawa R, Ukai K (2007) Effects of visually simulated roll motion on vection and postural stabilization. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4:39–49

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Groberg DH, Dustman RE, Beck EC (1969) The effect of body and head tilt in the perception of vertical: comparison of body and head tilt with left and right handed, male and female subjects. Neuropsychologia 7(1):89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stylianides GA, Beaulieu M, Dalleau G, Rivard CH, Allard P (2012) Iliac crest orientation and geometry in able-bodied and non-treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis girls with moderate and severe spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 21(4):725–732

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Forssberg H, Nashner LM (1982) Ontogenetic development of postural control in man: adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance. J Neurosci 2(5):545–552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Riach CL, Hayes KC (1987) Maturation of postural sway in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol 29(5):650–658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steindl R, Ulmer H, Scholtz A (2004) Standstabilität im Kindes- und Jugendalter. HNO 52(5):423–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Greffou S, Bertone A, Hanssens JM, Faubert J (2008) Development of visually driven postural reactivity: a fully immersive virtual reality study. J Vis 8(11):15.1–15.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Veldhuizen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eijgelaar, P.N., Wapstra, F.H., Otten, E. et al. Altered head orientation patterns in children with idiopathic scoliosis in conditions with sensory conflict. Eur Spine J 23, 2626–2634 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3508-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3508-3

Keywords

Navigation