Skip to main content

Low back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions

Abstract

Purpose

To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment approaches used in children and adolescents to manage and prevent low back pain (LBP).

Methods

Five electronic databases and the reference lists of systematic reviews were searched for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible for inclusion if they enrolled a sample of children or adolescents (<18 years old) and evaluated the effectiveness of any conservative intervention to treat or prevent LBP. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the PEDro scale, and rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria.

Results

Four RCTs on intervention and eleven RCTs on prevention of LBP were included. All included studies had a high risk of bias scoring ≤7 on the PEDro scale. For the treatment of LBP, a supervised exercise program compared to no treatment improved the average pain intensity over the past month by 2.9 points (95 % CI 1.6–4.1) measured by a 0–10 scale (2 studies; n = 125). For the prevention of LBP, there was moderate quality evidence to suggest back education and promotion programs are not effective in reducing LBP prevalence in children and adolescents.

Conclusions

While exercise interventions appear to be promising to treat LBP in children and adolescents, there is a dearth of research data relevant to paediatric populations. Future studies conducted in children and adolescents with LBP should incorporate what has been learnt from adult LBP research and be of rigorous methodological quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Woolf A, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81:646–656

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffries L, Milanese S, Grimmer-Somers K (2007) Epidemiology of adolescent spinal pain a systematic overview of the research literature. Spine 32:2630–2637

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Briggs A, Buchbinder R (2009) Back pain: a national health priority area in Australia? Med J Aust 190:499–502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Balagué F et al (1995) Low back pain in schoolchildren: a study of familial and psychological factors. Spine 20:1265–1270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taimela S et al (1997) The prevalence of low back pain among children and adolescents: a nationwide, Cohort-Based Questionnaire Survey in Finland. Spine 22:1132–1136

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. King S et al (2011) The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. Pain 152:2729–2738

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Watson K et al (2002) Low back pain in schoolchildren: occurrence and characteristics. Pain 97:87–92

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ochsmann E et al (2010) Prevalence of diagnosis and direct treatment costs of back disorders in 644,773 children and youths in Germany. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 11:193

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik K (2006) Are lifestyle-factors in adolescence predictors for adult low back pain? A cross-sectional and prospective study of young twins. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 7:27

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kosseim M, Rein R, McShane C (2008) Implementing evidence-based physiotherapy practice for treating children with low back pain: are we there yet? Pediatr Phys Ther 20:179–184

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jebaseelan DD et al (2012) Sensitivity studies of pediatric material properties on juvenile lumbar spine responses using finite element analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 50:515–522

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Junewick JJ (2010) Cervical spine injuries in pediatrics: are children small adults or not? Pediatr Radiol 40:493–498

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koes BW et al (2010) An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 19:2075–2094

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Steele EJ, Dawson AP, Hiller JE (2006) School-based interventions for spinal pain: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Calvo-Munoz I, Gomez-Conesa A, Sanchez-Meca J (2013) Physical therapy treatments for low back pain in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:55

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Furlan AD et al (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 34:1929–1941

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Macedo LG et al (2010) There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63:920–925

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maher CG et al (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83:713–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Atkins D et al (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adams R et al (2002) Recommendations for improving the quality of care through stroke centers and systems: an examination of stroke center identification options: multidisciplinary consensus recommendations from the Advisory Working Group on Stroke Center Identification Options of the American Stroke Association. Stroke 33:e1–e7

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Henschke N et al (2010) Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD002014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guyatt GH et al (2011) GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1283–1293

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guyatt GH et al (2008) Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones M et al (2007) The efficacy of exercise as an intervention to treat recurrent nonspecific low back pain in adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci 19:349–359

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones MA et al (2007) Recurrent non-specific low-back pain in adolescents: the role of exercise. Ergonomics 50:1680–1688

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fanucchi GL et al (2009) Exercise reduces the intensity and prevalence of low back pain in 12–13 year old children: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother 55:97–104

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahlqwist A et al (2008) Physical therapy treatment of back complaints on children and adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E721–E727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Candy EA et al (2012) Effect of a high-density foam seating wedge on back pain intensity when used by 14 to 16-year-old school students: a randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy 98:301–306

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bauer DH, Freivalds A (2009) Backpack load limit recommendation for middle school students based on physiological and psychophysical measurements. Work 32:339–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cardon GM et al (2007) Back education in elementary schoolchildren: the effects of adding a physical activity promotion program to a back care program. Eur Spine J 16:125–133

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dolphens M et al (2011) Long-term effectiveness of a back education programme in elementary schoolchildren: an 8-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 20:2134–2142

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Feingold AJ, Jacobs K (2002) The effect of education on backpack wearing and posture in a middle school population. Work 18:287–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gallardo Vidal M, Rodríguez Barrientos R, Borda Olivas A (2012) Evaluación de la efectividad de una intervención educativa para disminuir el peso de la mochila escolar en los alumnos de 3. y 4. de educación primaria. Fisioterapia

  34. Geldhof E et al (2006) Effects of a two-school-year multifactorial back education program in elementary schoolchildren. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1965–1973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Geldhof E et al (2007) Back posture education in elementary schoolchildren: a 2-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 16:841–850

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kovacs F et al (2011) Improving schoolchildren’s knowledge of methods for the prevention and management of low back pain: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E505–E512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Linton SJ et al (1994) The effects of ergonomically designed school furniture on pupils’ attitudes, symptoms and behaviour. Appl Ergon 25:299–304

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Moreira RF et al (2012) Effects of a school based exercise program on children’s resistance and flexibility. Work 41(Suppl 1):922–928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Spence SM, Jensen GM, Shepard KF (1984) Comparison of methods of teaching children proper lifting techniques. Phys Ther 64:1055–1061

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vidal J et al (2013) Effects of a postural education program on school backpack habits related to low back pain in children. Eur Spine J 22:782–787

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Verhagen AP et al (1998) The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1235–1241

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323:42

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hayden JA et al (2005) Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Ann Intern Med 142:765–775

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McGrath PJ et al (2008) Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 9:771–783

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors involved in the preparation of this manuscript have any potential, perceived or real conflict to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoe A. Michaleff.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 66 kb).

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Example search strategy for MEDLINE (OVID). The search terms were modified slightly for other databases. These are available on request from the authors.

Part A: generic search for randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials

1. randomised controlled trial.pt.

2. controlled clinical trial.pt.

3. comparative study.pt.

4. clinical trial.pt.

5. randomised.ab.

6. placebo.ab,ti.

7. drug therapy.fs.

8. randomly.ab,ti.

9. trial.ab,ti.

10. groups.ab,ti.

11. 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10

12. (animals not (humans and animals)).sh.

13. 11 not 12

Part B: specific search for thoracic, low back, sacrum and coccyx problems

14. dorsalgia.ti,ab.

15. exp Back Pain/

16. backache.ti,ab.

17. exp Low Back Pain/

18. (lumbar adj pain).ti,ab.

19. coccyx.ti,ab.

20. coccydynia.ti,ab.

21. sciatica.ti,ab.

22. sciatic neuropathy/

23. spondylosis.ti,ab.

24. lumbago.ti,ab.

25. back disorder$.ti,ab.

26. or/14‐25

Part C: sensitive search for children and adolescents

27. child$.ti,ab.

28. adolesce$.ti,ab.

29. youth$.ti,ab.

30. school$.ti,ab.

31. student$.ti,ab.

32. teena$.ti,ab.

33. young.ti,ab.

34. 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33

Part D: combined search

35. 13 AND 26 AND 34

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michaleff, Z.A., Kamper, S.J., Maher, C.G. et al. Low back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions. Eur Spine J 23, 2046–2058 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3461-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3461-1

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Systematic review
  • Children
  • Adolescents