Skip to main content
Log in

No kidding: low back pain and type of container influence adolescents’ perception of load heaviness

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The relationship between low back pain (LBP) and the lifting/carrying of loads is still a matter of great discussion. In teenagers, the weight of the school bag has been considered to play a pathogenic role in LBP but the relationship between the actual weight of the school bag and LBP symptoms does not seem to be a straightforward one. Numerous factors have been identified that influence the perception of weight. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of low back pain and the type of container on the perception of load heaviness by healthy teenagers.

Methods

A convenience sample of 80 healthy teenage males (mean ± SD age 13.9 ± 2.1 years) was recruited from the members of two local sports clubs. The volunteers were evaluated during one of their training sessions. Information about a history of consequential LBP was gathered by questionnaire. Subjects were invited to estimate the weight of three bags (a typical school bag, a sports bag with the logo of a well-known brand, and a neutral bag) containing two different loads (total weights approximately 3 and 5 kg).

Results

Consequential LBP (i.e., LBP requiring medical attention and/or interfering with usual sports activities) was reported by 26.2 % of them. The majority of the LBP episodes occurred ≥3 months before the tests. Overall, teenagers significantly (p ≤ 0.05) underestimated the weight of the sports bag compared with the school bag and the neutral bag. Compared with those with no LBP, subjects with a history of LBP overestimated the weight of the heavier load.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that several subjective variables significantly influence the perception of load heaviness. Until we have a better understanding of the mechanical role of the backpack weight versus the perception of its weight in the aetiology of LBP, any recommendations about the schoolbag weight limit should be viewed with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S (2008) A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 8:8–20. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Waterman BR, Belmont PJ Jr, Schoenfeld AJ (2012) Low back pain in the United States: incidence and risk factors for presentation in the emergency setting. Spine J 12:63–70. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marras WS (2001) Spine biomechanics, government regulation, and prevention of occupational low back pain. Spine J 1:163–165 (pii:S1529-9430(01)00053-5)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marras WS (2012) The complex spine: the multidimensional system of causal pathways for low-back disorders. Hum Factors 54:881–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Negrini S, Carabalona R (2002) Backpacks on! Schoolchildren’s perceptions of load, associations with back pain and factors determining the load. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dockrell S, Simms C, Blake C (2013) Schoolbag weight limit: can it be defined? J Sch Health 83:368–377. doi:10.1111/josh.12040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaspiris A, Grivas TB, Zafiropoulou C, Vasiliadis E, Tsadira O (2010) Nonspecific low back pain during childhood: a retrospective epidemiological study of risk factors. J Clin Rheumatol 16:55–60. doi:10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181cf3527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Talbott NR, Bhattacharya A, Davis KG, Shukla R, Levin L (2009) School backpacks: it’s more than just a weight problem. Work 34:481–494. doi:10.3233/WOR-2009-0949

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murray DJ, Ellis RR, Bandomir CA, Ross HE (1999) Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion. Percept Psychophys 61:1681–1685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buckingham G, Ranger NS, Goodale MA (2011) The material-weight illusion induced by expectations alone. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:36–41. doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0007-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Plaisier MA, Smeets JB (2012) Mass is all that matters in the size-weight illusion. PLoS One 7:e42518. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042518

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haselgrove C, Straker L, Smith A, O’Sullivan P, Perry M, Sloan N (2008) Perceived school bag load, duration of carriage, and method of transport to school are associated with spinal pain in adolescents: an observational study. Aust J Physiother 54:193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marras WS, Ferguson SA, Burr D, Davis KG, Gupta P (2004) Spine loading in patients with low back pain during asymmetric lifting exertions. Spine J 4:64–75 (pii: S1529943003004248)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Geisser ME, Robinson ME, Miller QL, Bade SM (2003) Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain. J Occup Rehabil 13:259–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta TB, Thorpe DE, Freburger JK (2002) Development of a survey to assess backpack use and neck and back pain in seventh and eighth graders. Pediatr Phys Ther 14:171–184 (pii: 00001577-200214040-00002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malina RM (2006) Weight training in youth-growth, maturation, and safety: an evidence-based review. Clin J Sport Med 16:478–487. doi:10.1097/01.jsm.0000248843.31874.be

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Burg JC, van Dieen JH (2001) Underestimation of object mass in lifting does not increase the load on the low back. J Biomech 34:1447–1453 (pii: S002192900100118X)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Faigenbaum AD, Milliken LA, Cloutier G, Westcott WL (2004) Perceived exertion during resistance exercise by children. Percept Mot Skills 98:627–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buckingham G, Cant JS, Goodale MA (2009) Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. J Neurophysiol 102:3111–3118. doi:10.1152/jn.0.0515.2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karwowski W, Shumate C, Yates JW, Pongpatana N (1992) Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting. Ergonomics 35:729–744. doi:10.1080/00140139208967359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Nicolet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicolet, T., Mannion, A.F., Heini, P. et al. No kidding: low back pain and type of container influence adolescents’ perception of load heaviness. Eur Spine J 23, 794–799 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3213-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3213-2

Keywords

Navigation