Abstract
Purpose
The relationship between low back pain (LBP) and the lifting/carrying of loads is still a matter of great discussion. In teenagers, the weight of the school bag has been considered to play a pathogenic role in LBP but the relationship between the actual weight of the school bag and LBP symptoms does not seem to be a straightforward one. Numerous factors have been identified that influence the perception of weight. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of low back pain and the type of container on the perception of load heaviness by healthy teenagers.
Methods
A convenience sample of 80 healthy teenage males (mean ± SD age 13.9 ± 2.1 years) was recruited from the members of two local sports clubs. The volunteers were evaluated during one of their training sessions. Information about a history of consequential LBP was gathered by questionnaire. Subjects were invited to estimate the weight of three bags (a typical school bag, a sports bag with the logo of a well-known brand, and a neutral bag) containing two different loads (total weights approximately 3 and 5 kg).
Results
Consequential LBP (i.e., LBP requiring medical attention and/or interfering with usual sports activities) was reported by 26.2 % of them. The majority of the LBP episodes occurred ≥3 months before the tests. Overall, teenagers significantly (p ≤ 0.05) underestimated the weight of the sports bag compared with the school bag and the neutral bag. Compared with those with no LBP, subjects with a history of LBP overestimated the weight of the heavier load.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that several subjective variables significantly influence the perception of load heaviness. Until we have a better understanding of the mechanical role of the backpack weight versus the perception of its weight in the aetiology of LBP, any recommendations about the schoolbag weight limit should be viewed with caution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S (2008) A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 8:8–20. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005
Waterman BR, Belmont PJ Jr, Schoenfeld AJ (2012) Low back pain in the United States: incidence and risk factors for presentation in the emergency setting. Spine J 12:63–70. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.002
Marras WS (2001) Spine biomechanics, government regulation, and prevention of occupational low back pain. Spine J 1:163–165 (pii:S1529-9430(01)00053-5)
Marras WS (2012) The complex spine: the multidimensional system of causal pathways for low-back disorders. Hum Factors 54:881–889
Negrini S, Carabalona R (2002) Backpacks on! Schoolchildren’s perceptions of load, associations with back pain and factors determining the load. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:187–195
Dockrell S, Simms C, Blake C (2013) Schoolbag weight limit: can it be defined? J Sch Health 83:368–377. doi:10.1111/josh.12040
Kaspiris A, Grivas TB, Zafiropoulou C, Vasiliadis E, Tsadira O (2010) Nonspecific low back pain during childhood: a retrospective epidemiological study of risk factors. J Clin Rheumatol 16:55–60. doi:10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181cf3527
Talbott NR, Bhattacharya A, Davis KG, Shukla R, Levin L (2009) School backpacks: it’s more than just a weight problem. Work 34:481–494. doi:10.3233/WOR-2009-0949
Murray DJ, Ellis RR, Bandomir CA, Ross HE (1999) Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion. Percept Psychophys 61:1681–1685
Buckingham G, Ranger NS, Goodale MA (2011) The material-weight illusion induced by expectations alone. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:36–41. doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0007-4
Plaisier MA, Smeets JB (2012) Mass is all that matters in the size-weight illusion. PLoS One 7:e42518. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042518
Haselgrove C, Straker L, Smith A, O’Sullivan P, Perry M, Sloan N (2008) Perceived school bag load, duration of carriage, and method of transport to school are associated with spinal pain in adolescents: an observational study. Aust J Physiother 54:193–200
Marras WS, Ferguson SA, Burr D, Davis KG, Gupta P (2004) Spine loading in patients with low back pain during asymmetric lifting exertions. Spine J 4:64–75 (pii: S1529943003004248)
Geisser ME, Robinson ME, Miller QL, Bade SM (2003) Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain. J Occup Rehabil 13:259–276
Mehta TB, Thorpe DE, Freburger JK (2002) Development of a survey to assess backpack use and neck and back pain in seventh and eighth graders. Pediatr Phys Ther 14:171–184 (pii: 00001577-200214040-00002)
Malina RM (2006) Weight training in youth-growth, maturation, and safety: an evidence-based review. Clin J Sport Med 16:478–487. doi:10.1097/01.jsm.0000248843.31874.be
van der Burg JC, van Dieen JH (2001) Underestimation of object mass in lifting does not increase the load on the low back. J Biomech 34:1447–1453 (pii: S002192900100118X)
Faigenbaum AD, Milliken LA, Cloutier G, Westcott WL (2004) Perceived exertion during resistance exercise by children. Percept Mot Skills 98:627–637
Buckingham G, Cant JS, Goodale MA (2009) Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. J Neurophysiol 102:3111–3118. doi:10.1152/jn.0.0515.2009
Karwowski W, Shumate C, Yates JW, Pongpatana N (1992) Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting. Ergonomics 35:729–744. doi:10.1080/00140139208967359
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nicolet, T., Mannion, A.F., Heini, P. et al. No kidding: low back pain and type of container influence adolescents’ perception of load heaviness. Eur Spine J 23, 794–799 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3213-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3213-2